Category: English

Assignment For this assignment, you will write a brief analysis of either a film or TV show. This will, in part, be something that you will want to work on for your final paper, but you do not need to worry about that right now. You can choose either a TV show or a film, but it should be something that you are interested in finding out more about and that you like and could be willing to work with for the remainder of the semester. The analysis will be focused on making an argument about a central meaning or theme present in the text and how the creator develops that theme or meaning. Basically, pick a TV show or film and tell me what it means beyond just what happens (the plot). Approach First, you will need to develop an idea of what you see as a meaning or theme of the text (the TV show or film you have selected)– what is its point / what is the creator trying to say / what is the creator trying to get us to think about. Next, you will need to cull the text for the techniques that you see in use that bring out the meaning or theme. Depending on the text you have chosen, these may include camera angle and lighting, the story and the characters (it will be mostly this), or music and imagery, to name only a few. You will need to decide which you think are the most significant to bringing out what you are saying is the central meaning or theme of the text. Refer to those things specifically in your paper and, most importantly, say how they do what you say they do. Note that you will NOT talk about the whole of the film or show. You cannot in 3-5 pages. Finally, you will craft a thesis statement, which will appear in your introduction, and introduction that address the relationship of technique to theme and establishes the direction the paper is going to take. The paper itself will then be an extended explication of that using specific reference to the text (quotes) and explanation of their importance. The body paragraphs should relate back to the thesis and develop the idea throughout the paper. Some Comments Strive to frame your comments and analysis in the terms of what the creator is doing, not just what is happening in the text. So, don’t just say “this character does this.” Rather, say “the show has the character do this in order to show X,” where X is some idea from your thesis. Be as specific as possible in the evidence used. You do not need to recount the whole text – only the moments that are important to your argument. Your reader is familiar with the texts, but may not remember all of the details. Start early. Give yourself time to think, write, think some more, and then rewrite. Take chances. Don’t worry about “reading too much into it.” See where it leads you.

Instructions for the Discussion Board:
Read Chapter 4 from the book “Wierzbicka2006” to familiarize yourself with the concept of evaluations attached to words.
Post your answers to the following questions as a response on the discussion board:
a. What is the concept of “reasonable” as discussed in Chapter 4?
b. Find a synonym for the word “reasonable” and explain its meaning.
c. Provide examples of how the word “reasonable” is used to denote different meanings in Saudi Arabian society.
Structure your response in a well-organized essay format, ensuring clarity and coherence in your writing.
Use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation in your response.
Engage in respectful and constructive discussions with your peers regarding their responses providing thoughtful feedback and insights related to their answers.

Here are some basic requirements of the essay:
Your argumentative essay will need to be between four (full) to six pages in length.
You must address a debatable ethical issue that has at least two sides (your topic must be something that you are passionate about. You cannot write about the run-of-the-mill topics such as abortion, global warming, marijuana, or gun control. Pick an interesting and unique topic and email me for approval).
Effectively address the rhetorical situation – audience, purpose, context
articulate a clear position regarding the issue and argue that position with logical reasons
adequately develop the argument using credible support (research)
acknowledge the opposing viewpoints and employ counterargument or concession
identify and explain the assumptions, contexts, and consequences of the various positions.
Utilize at least 5 credible sources – from scholarly databases, books, etc. (no google or dot com sources)
MLA formatting – you must have a Works Cited page at the end.
Topic: 1. The Effect of High Deductibles on Healthcare Access
Explanation: High-deductible health plans are increasingly popular as a cost-saving
measure for employers and insurers. However, they can create significant barriers for
patients needing medical care, as individuals may delay or forgo necessary treatments due
to the high out-of-pocket costs required before insurance coverage kicks in.
Ethical Dilemma: The ethical concern here centers on the principle of equity in healthcare
access. Should individuals be forced to choose between financial security and their
health? This raises questions about the fairness of a system that prioritizes cost savings
over patient well-being.

Project 2: Rhetorical Analysis
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to assess a text’s rhetorical effectiveness by identifying the text’s purpose and analyzing how elements of that text are used to persuade the intended audience toward that purpose.
Goal: A rhetorical analysis explains how/why a text might be effective for a particular audience. Your goal will be to analyze the effectiveness of a written text’s rhetoric, using classical/Aristotelian analysis as it is explained in Student’s Guide.
Assignment:
Select one of the following texts:
Claudia Rankine – “Graphite Against the Sharp White Background” – https://slate.com/culture/2015/08/serena-williams-… (Heres the link to the reading)
Determine the specifics about the texts rhetorical situations:
1.You need to identify the specific audience the texts addresses.
2.You must determine what’s the “message” or “purpose” for this audience.
Note: Your thesis should address WHAT the text is doing (its purpose or argument), HOW it is doing that (persuasive strategies), and WHY it is effective or not effective for its intended audience (this last component should be saved for your reinstated thesis).
Do not devote too much time to introductions or conclusions; the bulk of your work should be dedicated to analysis. The introduction should state the creator’s purpose and thesis, as well as briefly introduce/describe the text. The conclusion should discuss the implications of your analysis and offer your final thoughts on the rhetorical effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the piece.
Your essay must be separated into paragraphs that form a coherent and logical argument. Your essay needs to be fully developed, with each point you make adequately supported by illustrations from the text and thoroughly explained in full and clear detail (PIE Paragraphs).
You will be allowed the option to set up a “lens” for your analysis with outside sources–as long as sources are approved by Rafael.
Note: Remember, one paragraph—one idea.
The finer details:
·There is no reason for any deviation from the standard formatting (no “cheap tricks” of messing with margins or character spacing, etc). Your essay must follow MLA guidelines for format: Typed, Double-Spaced, Size 12 font (Times New Roman or Times font), with 1” margins on all sides.
·4-5 pages in length, not including Works Cited. Any essay that is less than 4 pages will not receive full credit because it won’t be long enough to effectively explain your thesis.

I am writing an essay on whether autonomous weapons should be used in warfare.
• Essay requirements: Must be 1200–1500 words, include at least four sources (one scholarly), and follow MLA format.

Your presentation must have a minimum of 15 slides, excluding the cover page and reference page.
Make sure you gather sufficient material to meet this requirement.

Process Analysis Assignment Guidelines
Word Count: 700-900 words
Formatting: Follow MLA guidelines (12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, 1-inch margins)
In this assignment, you will write a process analysis essay, which breaks down a series of steps in a process. This essay can take this form:
Directional Process Analysis: This type gives instructions, guiding the reader to follow the steps and achieve a specific result (e.g., how to bake a cake).
Objective
Your goal is to explain a process clearly and logically, using detailed descriptions and step-by-step instructions. Ensure the reader understands the importance of each step and how the steps fit together in a chronological order. You are also expected to include your own perspective or insight on the process—whether it’s easier or harder than expected, commonly misunderstood, or something else you want to highlight.
Key Points to Include
Background Information
Provide the reader with context or background knowledge that will help them understand your topic. Clearly define the process and the desired outcome or purpose of following the steps.
Clear, Sequential Steps
Present the steps of the process in a clear and logical order. Be sure to break down each step with detailed descriptions. If some steps happen simultaneously, make that clear to avoid confusion.
Importance of Each Step
Identify which steps are more critical and explain why. Not all steps carry the same weight, and highlighting the most important ones will help your reader grasp the process fully.
Use of Transitions
Ensure that the essay flows smoothly by using transitional words like “first,” “next,” “then,” and “finally” to guide the reader through the steps.
Point of View
You may use first- or third-person narrative depending on the type of process you are describing. If you’re explaining a process you have personal experience with, first person (“I”) might make the essay more engaging. Otherwise, third person is appropriate for more formal or technical processes.
Introduction and Conclusion
Your essay should start with an engaging introduction that includes your thesis (a brief overview of the process and its significance). End with a strong conclusion that summarizes the importance of the process or reflects on the outcome.
Checklist for Your Essay
Audience Awareness: Write with your audience in mind. What background knowledge do they already have? What do they need to understand this process clearly?
Clarity: Ensure that every step is clearly explained, with detailed descriptions where needed. Avoid vague instructions.
Tone and Style: Use semi-formal language. Avoid slang or overly casual expressions.
Transitions: Use language that signals movement between steps (e.g., “first,” “next,” “finally”) and ensures the essay flows smoothly.
Consistency: Keep the point of view consistent (either first or third person throughout the essay).
Submission Details
Length: 700-900 words
Format: MLA
Final Thoughts
Process analysis essays are more than just a list of steps—they should provide insight into the process and help the reader fully understand how and why it works. Remember to use descriptive language, provide necessary background information, and clearly outline each step to create an informative and engaging essay.
Process: how to create a resume for a nursing job
Audience: nursing students who are getting ready to graduate

For your third essay, you will be comparing two pieces of writing, selecting ONE of the two sets of essays you’ve been given (either Marriage OR
Torture)
As you’ve read and we’ve discussed in class, you can write either a point-to-point comparison or a subject-to-subject comparison. Either way, your first step in completing this essay will be to choose your subjects and your points.
Once you’ve chosen your subjects, decide which points you will want to compare the two. These can be elements of writing style (tone, language, voice, organization, etc.), approach, or, in limited fashion, the facts the writer has chosen to present—but NOT arguing the ideas presented in the articles, because you’re analyzing the structure and presentation of their arguments.
Begin by listing all of the points you can find, and then choose those that present the best opportunity for expansion. Next, you’ll write and perfect a thesis sentence, which has to make a statement about both subjects: “Subject A is far more than Subject B,” or that something that seems to be similar is actually different, or vice versa. After that, it will be much easier to begin writing.
APA FORMAT
DO NOT USE AI
ONLY USE SOURCES WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS

In this unit, we focused on the importance of receiving and responding to feedback and the editing and revision processes. Part of the revision process is sharing with others about what you have experienced. Sometimes, you articulate your steps for others to help you to better understand your own process. For this post, consider the process you went through as you brainstormed and proposed your topic in the Unit III Scholarly Activity; submitted the first portion of the assignment in Unit IV; and as you have hopefully begun revising and developing your work based on the feedback you received.

First, how is your thesis coming along? Do you believe that your overall argument is strong?
Were you surprised by the feedback and suggestions for improvement you received on your Unit III Journal and Unit IV Assignment?
What have you found to be most helpful for you in developing your ideas about the project and the paper itself?
What would you share with others about your process?
What techniques, tips, and methods have you used to help the process go more smoothly for you?

You can also describe methods that were not as helpful to you and what you would like to do in the future that you think might be better. Your classmates may benefit from hearing about your overall process, just as you may learn and benefit from hearing about others’ processes.

The journal response must be a minimum of 250 words, address the prompt, be grammatically correct, and include the MLA heading.
Prompt:
After reading the article “Your Powerful, Changeable Mindset” by Mia Primeau (link is in weekly overview), write a summary of the article.
Your powerful, changeable mindset | Stanford Report