Category: English

i need you to summarize this website and discuss what is on every page click on the link to the website.

“I have provided feedback on your assignment.
My feedback identifies patterns in your writing, and I highlight examples from your essay to illustrate those patterns. I do not point to every sentence or word that needs to be changed.
I include written comments. To review my written comments, please click on the Grademark or Turnitin report. Please click on the document twice to populate the blue bubbles with my comments.
Here are my wrap up comments:
Good job including some scholarly sources.
Can you replace outdated sources?
Can you limit your categories to three? This will help you with synthesis because you will have enough sources to talk about similarities and differences that lead to some type of pattern.
Can you continue to work on synthesis? This is the most important aspect of this assignment.
Finally, please make sure to review the rubric.”
The above information is my instructor’s feedback. It seems the biggest note of concern to her is cohesion, sections that read like an informative essay, and out-of-date resources. I have placed in the instructor’s notes as comments on the sections she had noted.
Please follow her notes as best as possible, and most importantly, any change must be made in TRACK CHANGES; otherwise, she will not grade the assignment.
Lastly I have added the rubric containing the instructor feedback please review.
As always thank you!

Watch this “Library Resources” video. There are MANY resources on the libraries homepage, but the video focuses on three of the most popular. You should watch the video in it’s entirety to be able to complete Step 2.
Step 2:
Find two resources related to your topic/research question. In both cases, the source should answer questions for you or build on your understanding of the topic in a useful way. If the source is hard for you to understand or if it’s only “kind of” related to your topic, keep looking. Find one that you understand and that helps you build more knowledge on your topic.
One source must be located using a library database.
The other may be found using Opposing Viewpoints in Context or the Library Catalog.
Use the information from the video to help you do this. Then answer the following questions for each source:
Introduce the source concisely (aim for about 50 words).
Include the full name of the speaker(s), provide their most relevant credentials, and describe their rhetorical situation (genre, audience, and purpose).
Then discuss how this source answers questions you have about your topic and/or enhances your understanding in some way. Include a brief (1-3 sentence) summary for each source that highlights the most important things you learned about your topic from that source. (Note – if you didn’t learn anything, then this is not a good choice.)
Consider how the source participates in a conversation:
What aspect(s) of the problem/issue/topic does this source seem to focus on most? What kinds of information does this source not discuss?
What new, surprising, or unexpected information came up in this source? (This can be information that was in response to your questions, or information unrelated to your questions.
Does this source seem to take strong position on the issue? Does this source mention other resources?
Describe the features of the text. What genre is it (a news article, journal article, book, etc)? How does the text package the information within (Does it include lots of graphics/quotes/statistics? How is it organized? What’s the tone of the text?) Who do you think the original audience is?
Summarize how you found this source. What library resource did you use, what search terms did you use, etc?
Step 3: Reflect
Did you find information you had not found before by using the library webpage? Or did you find a kind of source you had not found before? Had you ever used the library webpage in this way? What did you learn through this activity? What questions do you still have about the libraries? Did you feel comfortable using these resources?

Read the articles
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/23/opinions/women-register-for-draft-kayyem-medina/index.html
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/04/17/pete-buttigieg-national-service-program-civil-service-military-community-2020-mandatory-americorps/3495306002/
(and watch the video)

under the “Public Service” module. Then write a brief response (300 words minimum) comparing the sources to each other. How and why do they agree and/or disagree? How do their ideas overlap? How does the article about women in the military overlap or compare with the article and video pertaining to public service? Remember, this assignment is not asking for your personal views. You are being asked to understand, compare, and contrast your sources against each other.
Remember: each time you introduce a source, give the person’s full name. (After that, you can refer to them by last name.) Let the reader know WHO the person is, and somewhere in your discussion/comparison, use some quotes from these people. And make sure they are BLENDED quotes! All the things you did in your Annotated Bibliography. The goal is to get used to doing these things so that it is like second nature.
As always:
–Microsoft Word doc
–double-spaced
–300 words minimum (no maximum)
–TNR, 12-point, standard margins
–number the pages
–put your name on it
–don’t use the word STATES/STATED!!!

write an e-journal entry (350-400) words reflecting on the text you have enjoyed the most in the syllabus( arabian nights, sympathy, bronzeville mother , the lost sister, the other, and the palanquin bearers. Why did you choose this text in particular and how are you relating it to the issue of gender?

– please look at the pictures and on the first one that says discussions you must get an source that supports an cleaning hobby and persuade others to like this hobby. The second part is the outline and the instructions are listed. Lastly, the rough draft must be written instructions are on the pictures.

In the chapter titled “The Fight with Three Stars,” (IN THE BOOK, ATTACHED) Black Elk says his father “told me … we were going to have to fight from then on, because there was no other way to keep our country.” However, later, in “Walking the Black Road,” his father admits “all of the fighting had not done any good,” because the Lakota were outnumbered and were not unified in their resistance: “the Hangs-Around-the-Fort people were getting ready to sell the Black Hills to the Wasichu anyway.” Although Black Elk and his group end their armed resistance, they do not embrace cooperation with the Americans: “Our people were all sad because Crazy Horse was dead, and now they were going to pen us up in little islands and make us be like Wasichus,” he says in “Grandmother’s Land.” His family flees to Canada, in order to continue living according to Lakota traditions and values. Even though his family eventually returns to their homeland, Black Elk does not like the lifestyle the Americans enforce upon the Lakota. For instance, he dislikes the American homes they live in, “little gray houses.” In “The First Cure” he says, “It is a bad way to live, for there can be no power in a square.” I write all of this to give you some context for Luther Standing Bear’s attitude toward the Americans. In a brief response (at least 300 words — double-spaced!), describe for me Standing Bear’s attitude toward Americans and their efforts to educate him in their culture. Tell me about two events he narrates that give some insight to his response to these efforts. Be sure to explain HOW these events illustrate his attitude (positive or negative) toward the Americans and their efforts to educate him. Keep in mind the formula I have discussed this semester for academic writing: claim + evidence + explanation. Responses will be evaluated based upon their use of evidence from the text (specific events, key words, etc.) and how that evidence is explained in relation to a claim that clearly responds to the prompt. Some students try to answer this quiz by writing about Black Elk only. Remember: You are reading several chapters from Luther Standing Bear’s book, My People the Sioux. You need to answer this question based on those chapters. You are writing about Standing Bear, not Black Elk. I have not asked about Black Elk. (Also, you are writing about Luther Standing Bear and not the Standing Bear who is mentioned in Neihardt’s book.)

Make sure that if your thesis was weak from your previous assignment, you have revised it. If you are still unsure, email your instructor.
For your outline, identify the main sections: Start by determining the main sections or major ideas that you want to cover in your paper. These will serve as the primary headings or Roman numerals (I, II, III) in your outline. Generally, you should have an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Break down the main sections: Under each main section, list subpoints or supporting details that expand on the main idea. These can be represented by capital letters (A, B, C) or Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3). Think about the key arguments or information you want to include in each section.
Provide further details: For each subpoint, include specific details, examples, or explanations that support and develop that subpoint. You can use lowercase letters (a, b, c) or lowercase Roman numerals (i, ii, iii) to indicate these additional levels of information.
Remember to keep your ideas connected to your thesis statement and annotated bibliography.
I have the annotated bibliography that has the resources and thesis attached below. The outline should follow all of the instructions above.

The Color Purple (2023) Directed by Blitz Bazawule

Look at this scene. Spend some time looking at composition, color, framing, etc.
Now, write an analysis using terms from Ch. 5 “mise-en-scène”. Analyze this scene moment though analysis of the rhetorical choices (how did they construct this still scene) made by the director. You do not have to have seen the whole film to analyze this scene.
Guidelines
500-750 Words
MLA

Week 6A: Sexual Morality
After reading the selections for this topic, discuss how natural law theory, Kantian deontology and utilitarianism would address sexual behavior. You may choose to focus on a specific type of behvaior, i.e. same-sex marriage, homosexuality, prostitution, etc., or you may focus on sexual behavior writ large. As always, please be respectful of your peers, and focus on the readings in your answers.

Week 6B: Equality and Discrimination
After doing the readings for this topic, answer the following question:
Should racial, gender, or other differences ever be relevant in making decisions about qualified candidates for jobs or educational opportunities? Make sure to support your answer with reference to the concepts discussed in the chapter.