Category: English

i submitted both assignments one i didnt get to do but can all be in one the quote on one paper two different quote pick out of the student essay
the next assignment i uploaded the play i picked out.

Use the paper labeled for positional paper for an example of how the paper the paper is supposed to look

Writing a research paper and it’s in inspired by my readings on a book called Garbology. Not about the book but inspirations. So I need this paper to be about Pollution in our oceans such as plastic pollution the affects this causes to oceans, How this affects marine life, coral reefs and how this can lead to human health. I have three sources picked and if I can use these I need two more sources I started an annotated bibliography with those choses sources.

I have a speech written; I just need it put into an MLA outline. I have attached the speech and outline rubric. Please feel free to change or add anything, especially if intro and conclusion is not strong

Use the attached Annotated Bibliography to do the following work: The attached was done by you if I did this correctly.
Create a 250 word research proposal–be careful to stay as close to this number as possible. Include the thesis and a brief description of your evidence. The conclusion of your proposal should list some of the sources that you plan to use. This is often done in either one paragraph three paragraphs: thesis, evidence, research.
Like the annotated bibliography, you are not locked into this for your research essay. Think of it as a tentative statement. There are many factors that could cause you to change your topic, and if that happened, it would be ok.

Overview: The argument analysis paper will focus on Blommaert & Varis (2015) “Enoughness, accent, and light communities,” which we have discussed in detail in our course. If you have completed homework carefully, you should be well prepared to write this 1000-1200-word analysis.

The task of this assignment is to identify what the argument is and how Blommaert & Varis (2015) make it, as well as why it is significant. The key to this assignment is not trying to account for every point the authors make, but rather focusing on the kernel of the argument and explaining how Blommaert & Varis (2015) get there through subclaims and evidence. What problems do Blommaert & Varis (2015) address? What are the key takeaways?

This analysis is not asking you simply to summarize or paraphrase the article’s information point by point. You may have written something like that in the past if you were asked to write a “summary.” Instead, the task is for you to analyze the argument by breaking it into parts and explaining how Blommaert & Varis (2015) have presented and organized evidence to support claims/subclaims. Your final paper will engage the paper complexly; it will not progress only in chronological order through the authors’ argument.

Each student’s analysis and interpretation of Blommaert & Varis (2015) will be slightly different. Remember that as this is an analysis about the authors’ argument, it is not about the issue in general, and it is not to be about your own perspective on it. There will be no additional sources permitted in the assignment.

Rationale: This type of paper is the first step toward entering an academic conversation because it requires you to re-articulate another author’s point of view. All research participates in an ongoing academic conversation, and to do so responsibly, you must be able to demonstrate that you understand the voices that have already spoken. In research articles, this kind of argument analysis writing is usually found in the review of literature section.

Audience: The audience of this paper is an academic audience interested in studying identity. This audience is not familiar with Blommaert.

Process: Re-read Blommaert & Varis (2015), annotating the text as necessary. Be mindful of how they craft the argument, what sections there are, and how they signal their argument’s organization to the reader. Students will do several planning and pre-writing activities to help them structure their papers. They will submit a drafted paper and receive instructor feedback, which they will be expected to thoughtfully incorporate into the final draft.

Organization/The Parts: This paper should contain an introduction, a 2-paragraph body, and a conclusion. The introduction should include your key claim (i.e. what and how Blommaert & Varis (2015) make an argument) and a brief preview of the body of the paper. The 2 body paragraphs should each be carefully crafted around a point or topic sentence that captures the claim of the paragraph, followed by sentences that show/explain where in the chapter you found support for the claims. With only 2 body paragraphs to work with, you must have a very clear sense of what you are arguing and how you will organize it.

Format: Your final draft must be 3-4 double-spaced pages (1000-1200 words) using Times New Roman (or equivalent) 12 point font with one-inch margins. Include page numbers, a title that reflects the content of your paper (“My Analysis Paper” is not sufficient), and reference list (containing the course source only) in APA format. Please, clearly state your name, course, and assignment on the top left corner of the first page of your assignment (or on a title page), as follows:
Noora Al Kuwairi
76-100X Prof. Gomez-Laich
Argument Analysis Draft/Final
September 19, 2023

Use APA in-text citation in the body of the text to cite quotes and paraphrases.

Excerpt on Academic Integrity and AI from our syllabus:
Inappropriate collaborations or submissions:
The following constitute forms of inappropriate collaboration or submissions that will be deemed as plagiarism and will result in an academic integrity violation.
1. Talking to your classmate(s) or other CMUQ students about an assignment and submitting work that includes the same ideas and/or uses the same language as your classmate’s work in some portion of the assignment or in the entire assignment.
2. Receiving help from someone who may have ideas and use vocabulary that you may not understand if asked to explain.
3. Submitting somebody’s writing as your own writing.
4. Copying and pasting information from our course readings, other texts, the discussion board, or the internet without referencing the source.
5. Submitting writing generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs your own (See below for more details).
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs in your writing:
We recognize that there are a variety of AI programs such as ChatGPT or Bard available to assist writers. AI programs are not a replacement for human creativity, originality, and critical thinking. Writing is a craft that takes time and effort to develop. You need to take ownership of your
writing, and you are responsible for all the information in your submissions. Be aware that AI-generated writing includes factual errors, made-up sources, unpredictable changes to flow, impersonal language, voiceless writing, and inconsistent task or assignment completion. Submitting AI-generated writing that includes factual errors or made-up sources will constitute an academic integrity violation.
You are not authorized to use AI to produce writing for this class and claim it as your own. Unauthorized forms of AI assistance include claiming ownership of a claim generated by AI and using AI to modify or correct a claim you wrote. However, there will be opportunities in the course to explore authorized uses of AI in your writing. For these uses, you will receive significant guidance on the appropriate use and attribution of AI. For example, we may work on improving our writing skills by critiquing and enhancing AI responses to a prompt, brainstorming ideas for major papers, or revising your existing work. You may not, however, construe this limited use as permission to use these technologies in any other facet of this course. Using these tools without my permission and
guidance puts your academic integrity at risk.
If I have authorized you to use AI in your writing assignment, please include the following acknowledgment following the reference list of your paper:
“I generated this text in part with [include AI program here]. Upon generating draft language, I reviewed, edited, and revised the language to meet the specific expectations of the assignment and I take ultimate responsibility for the content of this text.”

Paper Rubric
Sophisticated
Competent
Needs Work
A. Purpose

The paper has a significant central argument that clearly addresses an identified problem within a broader issue and shows that the writer’s sophisticated analysis is anchored in relevant disciplinary knowledge. The ideas in the paper are coherent, relevant, and consistently support the central argument. There is both convincing and sufficient evidence to support the author’s claims and to develop the argument.

B. Structure and Organization

The paper has clear sections that go beyond listing points to create connections between ideas and a sense of logical flow for the reader. The central argument is introduced using shared context and claims are previewed in the introduction using relevant disciplinary concepts. The paper demonstrates that the author has an accurate and sophisticated understanding of how disciplinary concepts should be used to present and organize information.

C. Paragraph Development

Each body paragraph focuses on one topic, and paragraphs are developed so that sentences flow from abstract to concrete. Topics sentences are anchored in disciplinary concepts, and paragraphs maintain the author’s consistent evaluations throughout. The paragraphs effectively integrate multiple voices to show how the author supports their analysis using disciplinary knowledge and evidence, demonstrating an awareness of multiple perspectives and aligning the reader with the writer’s position.

D. Presentation

The paper presents ideas clearly, precisely, and concisely using standard conventions for academic communication, including grammatically complete sentences and attention to word choice. The paper cites references appropriately and consistently.

General Comments:

Final Grade:
A shows sophisticated control in all the areas targeted by the above criteria and impresses the grader by letting them think about the argument and insights into disciplinary knowledge rather than focus on how the paper is written
Use the pdf i gave you of Bloomeart and varis as your only resource, this should be written as if the person reading the new argument anayslis doesnt know anything about identity.aim for a A matching all the criteria below and the format asked for

DISCUSS: Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the act of claiming language, ideas, opinions, theories, software code, artistic material, or anything else developed by another person without acknowledging that person as the source of the material. Doing this, especially at an academic or professional level, can have dire consequences. We are all made aware of this from the time we start school. However, the issue of giving credit to authors continues to be an issue in both academic and non-academic settings.
Real-life forms of plagiarism include copyright violations. Copyright is the exclusive legal right to reproduce, publish, sell, or distribute something such as literary works, music, or artistic works.
Copyright infringement is a form of plagiarism. Copyright infringement is when copyrighted work, such as music, is reproduced without the permission of the owner of the work. Lawsuits involving copyright infringement are seen often in music. Allegations of copyright violations have been made against various artists, including Cardi B., Nicki Minaj, Robin Thicke, The Verve, Kendrick Lamar, Lil Nas X, and Lana Del Ray. These lawsuits ask for large sums of money to be paid for violating copyright (i.e., plagiarism where someone earns money from another’s work or ideas).
One of the most notorious cases of alleged copyright violation occurred in the 1990s, when the band, Queen, and the singer, David Bowie, sued the rapper, Vanilla Ice, for copyright infringement. Queen and Bowie alleged that Vanilla Ice had plagiarized their song, “Pressure” in his 1991 rap, “Ice Ice Baby.” The case was settled by payment of an undisclosed amount by Vanilla Ice to Queen and David Bowie, as well as Queen and Bowie being given songwriter credit for the song “Ice, Ice Baby” due to Vanilla Ice’s obvious copyright infringement. YouTube links are below for you to compare the two songs
“Pressure” by Queen and David Bowie found here (Links to an external site.)
“Ice Ice Baby” by Vanilla Ice found here (Links to an external site.)
ernal site.)
The concern of many in the music industry is that copyright infringement has gone too far. The case that has raised this concern is a 2015 case about the song “Blurred Lines” by Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams. The copyright infringement charge brought by the estate of Marvin Gaye alleged that Thicke’s song, “Blurred Lines,” was a copyright violation of Gaye’s 1977 hit, “Got to Give It Up.” While the trial court found for Gaye’s estate, the court acknowledged that the melody, harmony, and rhyme were different. Yet, there were similarities in the sheet music and in the “style” or “vibe” of the songs. A jury award in favor of Gaye’s estate of just over seven million dollars has been upheld by an Appeals Court. YouTube links to the two songs are below if you are interested.
“Blurred Lines” by Robin Thick and Pharrell Williams found here (Links to an external site.)
“Got to Give It Up” by Marvin Gaye found here (Links to an external site.)
Discussion Topic for Week 2
For the discussion post this week, read and consider the TCC Administrative Policy for Academic Dishonesty
Links to an external siteas well as the cases of copyright discussed above. Create a discussion post to answer the following questions:
1. Why do you think plagiarism is still a problem in today’s world (both the academic and non-academic world)? What, if anything, could change to fix it?
2. Are consequences for plagiarism (or copyright violation) a deterrent? Explain your position.
3. Consider Artificial Intelligence (AI) options, such as ChatGPT, and plagiarism. AI is able to respond to a prompt by gathering information from sources, however, most AI programs refuse to explain how they gather data, which means the responses by AI do not cite the materials they use to formulate an answer. Why is this problematic?

Attached is a first draft of the essay. There will also be an attachment for improvementsfor the final draft. Make the necessary changes provided to complete the final draft.

PLEASE USE THE GRAPHIC ORGANIZER I CREATED TO WRITE THE ESSAY. THANK YOU
This assignment is the most heavily weighted so far. Take the time to read about the op-ed process and structure in “Action” and review each of the attached documents. “Consolidation” will give step-by-step instructions to help you complete the assignment. Here’s a general overview:
Write a 1 to 2 page single-spaced op-ed that includes at least 3 persuasive techniques. Persuasive Techniques PDF provided below and I have included the 3 that I want used (bandwagoning, explicit stated facts and analogy).
You’ll submit your op-ed in two stages: Stage 1 is due Friday, October 4 at midnight; you’ll submit your planning an op-ed graphic organizer (be sure to save this properly so your work is not lost), a rough draft of your bed, and an editing and proofreading checklist. Stage 2 is due Tuesday, October 8 at midnight; you’ll submit the final copy of your op-ed after incorporating feedback on the outline/rough draft

Overview
In this assignment, you will use the preliminary introduction you wrote in the previous module as a starting point to create the first version of the paper you will submit for your project. As such, your draft will focus on your analysis of the article you have been working with throughout the course. Because you have already drafted an introduction, you will now revise that introduction as needed and write the body paragraphs and conclusion.
Directions
For this assignment, you will explain the writer’s choices in relation to genre, audience, purpose, and subject. You will also write about the core idea of the text as well as the details that support it and use at least one quote from the article to support your analysis. Completing this assignment will result in a draft of the first part of your project. Complete this assignment using either the APA or MLA template linked in the What to Submit section.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Identify the topic of the text.
Explain the writer’s choices in relation to the genre of the text.
Describe the writer’s purpose.
Explain the writer’s choices in relation to the audience, purpose, and/or subject of the text.
Determine the historical and/or cultural context of the text.
Articulate the core idea of the text.
Summarize details of the text that are relevant to the core idea.
Support your analysis of the core idea with evidence from the text.
Include at least one quote from the text.
Explain how this evidence supports the core idea.
What to Submit
Using either the APA template or the MLA template, submit a one- to two-page Microsoft Word document (with an additional title page and reference page in the case of APA or a works cited page in the case of MLA) with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use evidence from the text to support your paper. Although you will refer to your selected text in your assignment, you will not refer to any sources from outside this course. Follow APA or MLA citation guidelines when citing the text both throughout and at the end of your analysis.
Supporting Materials
The following resources will support your work on this assignment:
Student APA Exemplar: Module Five Analysis of a Written Work for a First Audience APA Exemplar
This is an example of a completed assignment using the APA style template. You may want to use this as a guide when addressing the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Student MLA Exemplar: Module Five Analysis of a Written Work for a First Audience MLA Exemplar
This is an example of a completed assignment using the MLA style template. You may want to use this as a guide when addressing the rubric criteria for this assignment.