Category: Case Studies

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This is for a graduate school in school psychology student for Trauma and Neurobiology course.
The instructions:
1. find 3 different scholarly source articles of studies of neurofeedback and to summarize them 2 of the sources must be of children and 1 of adults.
I want you to include all of the following components of all 3 articles based on the articles:
– a. Summary of the entire research of EACH OF THE 3 articles and explain it and write it as if you had to teach the article information in the studies to me. so be very detailed and get all information of article very specifcially and in detail mentioning all variables they looked at, all scales, all measures, wha specifically was done, how it was done, who did it, who was involved, how it happened, where it took place.
– b. purpose of studies and research questions – SPECIFICALLY. include all variables researched in each and what they were researching
– c. participants- who they were, how many- was there control group? what was the control? how many groups? randomized control group or not?
d. diversity of participants ? gender difference if any? diversity in studies? where it has been studied? on which population? which disorder was it looking at? RESEARCH THIS FOR THE 3 STUDIES AND IN GENERAL
e. methods of study / what were measures used, scales used, tests used, and procedures – very specific as if you had to explain and teach it to me
f. results of study – specifically what were the variables they wre researching in study and what was the effect for each variable
g. Discuss the limitations of the research about neurofeedback in each of the studies and specifically what the research says about it and then the future directions of research
h. make a powerpoint presentation for it. as if to present it to my class with no more than 4 slides and include talking points as well as information to include into the powerpoint for it. this is for graduate school so make it professional. include all 3 article information into it. write the number of studies showed its effectiveness and cite them and the numbers that showed its ineffectiveness and cite them. include the limitations and future directions into powerpoint as well
THEN, IN ADDITION TO THE 3 ARTICLES DO THE FOLLOWING:
YOU MUST LOOK AT OTHER ARTICLE AND RESEARCH AS WELL TO FIND WHAT RESEARCH SAYS IS LIMITATIONS OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND WHY. MUST DISCUSS HOW MANY PARTICIPANTS IN STUDIES WHERE IT SHOWS LARGE EFFECT SIZE AND HOW MANY WHEN IT DOES NOT SHOW EFFECT SIZE. DISCUSS WHAT RESEARCH DISCUSSES FUTURE RESEARCH SHOULD ENTAIL AS WELL.
RESEARCH NEUROFEEDBACK IN GENERAL AND DISCUSS NUMBER OF STUDIES THAT SHOWED ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND SHOW NUMBER OF STUDIES SHOWED ITS INEFFECTVENESS AND DISCUSS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FOUND BETWEEN THEM AND WHY IT EVEN SHOWS THERE IS EFFECT SIZE AT ALL. BASICALLY GOAL IS TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER NEUROFEEDBACK HAS ENOUGH RESEARCH TO SAY IT IS AN EBI. IT HAS BEEN VERY POPULAR AMONG MANY DESPITE RESEARCH SHOWING THAT IT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE RESEARCH SHOWING AN INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE WITH NEUROFEEDBACK USE, DISCUSS WHY THAT IS AND IF IT CAN BE CONCLUDED TO BE EFFECTIVE WHY OR WHY NOT. BACK UP WITH LIABLE RESEARCH ONLY!
DO APA 7TH EDITION WORK CITED
NO PLAGIARISM!!!!
I PUT 4 PAGES FOR IT BUT THERE ISNT A PAGE COUNT BECAUSE IT IS NOT AN ESSAY BUT MUST ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS IN DETAIL AND EXPLAIN IT IN MANNER THAT I HAVE ALLL ASPECTS OF THE INFORMATION SUFFICIENTLY ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH AND EXPLAIN IT. ALSO DO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AS WELL.
Look into these aspects when doing research and discss it in addition to other aspects: Individual variability in response
Lack of standardization
Ethical and safety concerns
Integration with AI and machine learning
Potential for personalized neurofeedback
Please discuss all aspects and discuss the research in detail including variables measured and how they were measured using what and all the information
Basically need to cover all aspects and in addition to the 3 articles say what he research is saying about neurofeedback, is it effective? is it really actually effective or do studies have small sample size showing small increase in effect? give that input and limitations of research of neurofeedback and future direction of research
Its not a research paper. It is basically for a presentation I am asking you to do all the research for a presentation for me to know and understand all research so you need to fully do the research and explain all aspects and then also do a powerpoint presentation.
When you are looking at generally the research and limitations and how many effective studies and how many did not show effectiveness in improvement with neurofeedback, discuss ones from back then as well to show evolution in though if any, including when it was first researched. Also, discuss all variables of all studies like for example if it researched neurofeedback effectiveness for ADHD kids but improved processing speed and attention but not impulsivity do so that way. be very specific.
That it is all aspects a-h for the 3 articles and then separately in addition how many effectiveness studies how many not effectiveness studies and go into it and discuss why it showed effectiveness – (smaller study showing smaller effect size but large rigorous studies not showing any at all) be a skeptic and discuss whether it should be an EBI or not, is it actually scientifically proven to be effective or not? does it really work? or is it placebo effect as well? discuss what research says about that. and then future directions of the research as well.
in what setting are they studied? are they only in hospitals and that is why they cannot be applied to clinical setting or can they? do the studies show effctiveness because of that or would it work in clinical setting?
Look at if it helps those with trauma and ptsd if there is any research on that
Requirements: Minimum 4 Full Page PPT Script + PPT Slides Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and References
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool

INDIVIDUAL CASE COMPONENTS & EXPECTATIONS

KEY ISSUES
State the Aim/Goal of the Program/Organization
What are the critical success factors to achieving its aim/goal? Think in terms of value (quality and cost).
Identify 3 Key Issues (failures/challenges to achieving its critical success factors). Provide brief description of the causes of each.
As an analyst, you should provide at least one metric for each key issue that will indicate whether an alternative solution is having a favourable impact.
Supporting analysis should be provided in notes section and referenced.

THREE ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
Max 1 slides each, or one side for all three with brief description of each in notes.
Brief description of each.

ANALYSIS OF THREE ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
Analyze each alternative independently (do not compare/contrast the alternatives here)
Make sure to identify both the strengths and the weaknesses of the alternative according to how each key issue/metric would be impacted.
Put the details of the analysis in the notes section. Notes section could be quite lengthy. Create and refer to specific information that you provide in an Appendix section, if needed.
This is where the rigor of your analysis will be assessed. You should include specific calculations/methodologies here.

RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION
Identify the alternative that you are recommending.
Justify your recommendation by comparing the impact of each alternative solution on each key issue.
If you use Excel or other statistical analysis, these details should be in the Appendix.
Anticipate the questions that a decision maker will be sure to ask. Costs? Timelines? Level of Success? So be proactive and provide answers/estimates based upon the facts you have found, state assumptions, and risks.

GENERAL IMPRESSION
Should follow the guidance provided in the template. Professional & confidence inspiring.
Clear and easy to read and follow. Attention to language and grammar.

Read the article, “The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia” in chapter 7 of the text after having read “The Deadly Choices of Memorial” from question 1.
Do you believe that any of the staff members at
Memorial engaged in the practice of euthanasia. If so, why? If not, why
not? Your answer should be based on your personal beliefs and should
cite pertinent facts and circumstances in support of your opinion.

Create a PowerPoint presentation (minimum 10 slides) that demonstrates the use of professional guidelines and tools that create a strategy for dealing with an ethical dilemma in a simulated case study. Analyze the usefulness of those guidelines and tools.
Note: You are strongly encouraged to complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Ethical principles, professional standards, theories, and decision-making models provide guides for navigating complex moral choices in professional contexts.
An ethical dilemma is a situation that is difficult to resolve because no course of action will be a perfect solution. In such situations, critically analyzing and thinking about all applicable ethical principles and standards is important. Even then, it can be hard to make ethical decisions, but decisions must be made. Often, avoidance of making a decision is a decision within itself, and it can bring the worst possible outcome.
The process for solving ethical dilemmas can be multifaceted. You must consider all parts of a situation in order to make an informed and responsible decision about how to proceed ethically. The more layers, the more difficult an ethical dilemma is to resolve.
The American Psychological Association’s “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” and similar standards developed by other professional organizations are important sources of guidance. Ethical theories provide general frameworks for evaluating ethical positions. In addition, ethical decision-making models are important tools to resolve ethical dilemmas. These two concepts can be confusing.
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community.
Why are ethics important for practitioners?
What specific values, skills, and knowledge might you need to be ethical in your planned professional role as a psychological practitioner, educator, researcher, or organizational change agent?
What are the main theoretical positions in regard to ethics? Which do you think are most valuable? Why?
What ethical dilemmas might arise in your specialization?
How can ethical codes and standards help?
What are the strengths and limitations of these ethical codes and standards?
What are the differences between ethical theories and ethical decision-making models? How can each help you in your profession?
What are your current strengths (specific characteristics, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, and behaviors) that contribute to your ethics? What areas do you need to develop?
Note: The assessments in this course build upon each other, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them in sequence.
Use the Ethics Case Study Template [PPTX] Download Ethics Case Study Template [PPTX]to complete your Ethics Case Study assessment. Do not submit a paper for this assessment. Papers will not be graded.
Review Fisher’s Ethical Decision-Making Model to support your work on this assessment.
Capella Multimedia
Click the links provided below to view the following multimedia pieces:
Ethical Theories.
Case Study Scenario Part 1.
Case Study Scenario Part 2.
Download and use the Ethics Case Study Template. You will complete this assessment by replacing all language that is enclosed with brackets […] in the PowerPoint with your own words. As in the previous assessment, you may enhance the design of the presentation to make it more effective. Again, links to tips for using PowerPoint and designing effective presentations are provided in PowerPoint Resources activity.
Your PowerPoint should include the following:
Title slide: On the first slide of the PowerPoint:Enter a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words that concisely communicates the heart of the case study. It should stir interest while maintaining professional decorum.
Enter your name, and a job title and organization that would fit with your case study.
Case Study Overview slides: Provide the briefest possible narrative description of the professional conflict in the case. Additional supporting details and references can be added in the notes section in the slide. The overview should include:The professional setting of the case.
Brief descriptions of the individuals involved and their roles.
A brief summation of the ethical dilemma presented in the case study.
Ethical Concerns slides: Bullet point three or more ethical concerns in the case and apply one or more ethical standards to each concern. Additional supporting details and references can be added in the notes section on the slide. Be sure to link to elements of the code.
Comparison of Ethical Theories slides: In the first row of the provided table, enter the names of two ethical theories that you think would be the most appropriate for the situations in the case. In the following rows, enter comparisons of relevant features of the two theories. In the notes section, evaluate which theory provides a more functional framework for your case and explain why. (Note that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure you are comparing, contrasting, and evaluating two ethical theories).
Ethical Decision-Making Model slides:Choose an ethical decision-making model, and identify each step in the model.
Apply the model to your case and, under each step of the model, describe how that step would look if you applied it to the case.
Incorporate multicultural issues presented in the case study within the selected ethical decision-making model.
Add copies of this slide as needed, and combine steps on the slides as necessary or appropriate. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points. (Note that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure you are applying steps of the ethical decision-making model to your case).
Proposed Resolution slide: Use bullet points to summarize your proposed resolution to the ethical dilemmas in the case. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points.
References slides: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines.Citation requirements: You must cite at least three scholarly research articles. You may cite reputable sources form Web sites, books, textbooks, and suggested resources as well, but these will not count toward the three required scholarly research references.
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Format: Use the Ethics Case Study Template linked above. Use current APA style and formatting guidelines as applicable to this assessment.
References: Three scholarly research articles.
Length of PowerPoint: A minimum of 10 slides.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply ethical principles and standards to ethical dilemmas.
Competency 2: Employ models of ethical reasoning and ethical decision making.Ethical Theory: Analyze ethical theories and justify application of one theory in an attempt to resolve the ethical dilemma in the case study.
Ethical Decision Making: Apply steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma in the case study.
Solution: Design a viable solution for an ethical problem.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.Communication: Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization, following APA style standards.

Create a PowerPoint presentation (minimum 10 slides) that demonstrates the use of professional guidelines and tools that create a strategy for dealing with an ethical dilemma in a simulated case study. Analyze the usefulness of those guidelines and tools.
Note: You are strongly encouraged to complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Ethical principles, professional standards, theories, and decision-making models provide guides for navigating complex moral choices in professional contexts.
An ethical dilemma is a situation that is difficult to resolve because no course of action will be a perfect solution. In such situations, critically analyzing and thinking about all applicable ethical principles and standards is important. Even then, it can be hard to make ethical decisions, but decisions must be made. Often, avoidance of making a decision is a decision within itself, and it can bring the worst possible outcome.
The process for solving ethical dilemmas can be multifaceted. You must consider all parts of a situation in order to make an informed and responsible decision about how to proceed ethically. The more layers, the more difficult an ethical dilemma is to resolve.
The American Psychological Association’s “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” and similar standards developed by other professional organizations are important sources of guidance. Ethical theories provide general frameworks for evaluating ethical positions. In addition, ethical decision-making models are important tools to resolve ethical dilemmas. These two concepts can be confusing.
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community.
Why are ethics important for practitioners?
What specific values, skills, and knowledge might you need to be ethical in your planned professional role as a psychological practitioner, educator, researcher, or organizational change agent?
What are the main theoretical positions in regard to ethics? Which do you think are most valuable? Why?
What ethical dilemmas might arise in your specialization?
How can ethical codes and standards help?
What are the strengths and limitations of these ethical codes and standards?
What are the differences between ethical theories and ethical decision-making models? How can each help you in your profession?
What are your current strengths (specific characteristics, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, and behaviors) that contribute to your ethics? What areas do you need to develop?
Note: The assessments in this course build upon each other, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them in sequence.
Use the Ethics Case Study Template [PPTX] Download Ethics Case Study Template [PPTX]to complete your Ethics Case Study assessment. Do not submit a paper for this assessment. Papers will not be graded.
Review Fisher’s Ethical Decision-Making Model to support your work on this assessment.
Capella Multimedia
Click the links provided below to view the following multimedia pieces:
Ethical Theories.
Case Study Scenario Part 1.
Case Study Scenario Part 2.
Download and use the Ethics Case Study Template. You will complete this assessment by replacing all language that is enclosed with brackets […] in the PowerPoint with your own words. As in the previous assessment, you may enhance the design of the presentation to make it more effective. Again, links to tips for using PowerPoint and designing effective presentations are provided in PowerPoint Resources activity.
Your PowerPoint should include the following:
Title slide: On the first slide of the PowerPoint:Enter a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words that concisely communicates the heart of the case study. It should stir interest while maintaining professional decorum.
Enter your name, and a job title and organization that would fit with your case study.
Case Study Overview slides: Provide the briefest possible narrative description of the professional conflict in the case. Additional supporting details and references can be added in the notes section in the slide. The overview should include:The professional setting of the case.
Brief descriptions of the individuals involved and their roles.
A brief summation of the ethical dilemma presented in the case study.
Ethical Concerns slides: Bullet point three or more ethical concerns in the case and apply one or more ethical standards to each concern. Additional supporting details and references can be added in the notes section on the slide. Be sure to link to elements of the code.
Comparison of Ethical Theories slides: In the first row of the provided table, enter the names of two ethical theories that you think would be the most appropriate for the situations in the case. In the following rows, enter comparisons of relevant features of the two theories. In the notes section, evaluate which theory provides a more functional framework for your case and explain why. (Note that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure you are comparing, contrasting, and evaluating two ethical theories).
Ethical Decision-Making Model slides:Choose an ethical decision-making model, and identify each step in the model.
Apply the model to your case and, under each step of the model, describe how that step would look if you applied it to the case.
Incorporate multicultural issues presented in the case study within the selected ethical decision-making model.
Add copies of this slide as needed, and combine steps on the slides as necessary or appropriate. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points. (Note that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure you are applying steps of the ethical decision-making model to your case).
Proposed Resolution slide: Use bullet points to summarize your proposed resolution to the ethical dilemmas in the case. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points.
References slides: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines.Citation requirements: You must cite at least three scholarly research articles. You may cite reputable sources form Web sites, books, textbooks, and suggested resources as well, but these will not count toward the three required scholarly research references.
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Format: Use the Ethics Case Study Template linked above. Use current APA style and formatting guidelines as applicable to this assessment.
References: Three scholarly research articles.
Length of PowerPoint: A minimum of 10 slides.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply ethical principles and standards to ethical dilemmas.
Competency 2: Employ models of ethical reasoning and ethical decision making.Ethical Theory: Analyze ethical theories and justify application of one theory in an attempt to resolve the ethical dilemma in the case study.
Ethical Decision Making: Apply steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma in the case study.
Solution: Design a viable solution for an ethical problem.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.Communication: Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization, following APA style standards.

Chapter 6: Mini-Case Hotel Flowchart and Blueprint
Writing Requirements
3-4 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Grading Criteria:
PURPOSE & AUDIENCE 25%Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, format and citation in APA style (where relevant) effectively25points
Adheres to purpose, Fulfills assignment, shows adequate understanding of key issues, style is appropriate to intended audience, presentation is readable, format is correct.
21 points
Waivers in purpose, incompletely addresses assigned topics or directions, shows more need to examine issues, style varies, and visual presentation is ragged.
19 points
Purpose unclear, failure to address topic or directions, weak group of issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
15 points
Purpose unclear, does not address topic or directions, does not address issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
0 points
ORGANIZATION 25%Focuses consistently on clearly expresses central idea, uses paragraph structure and transition guide reader effectively
25points
Central idea is clear, paragraph structure is adequate, some problems with consistency, logic or transitions
21 points
Loose focus on central idea, contains some repetition and digression, structure needs work
19 points
Does not focus on central idea, contains many repetitions and digression, very weak structure.
15 points
No central idea, no clear logic or focus, many repetitions or digressions, lack of structure
0 points
DEVELOPMENT 25%Explores ideas vigorously, supports points fully using a balance of subjectivity and objective evidence, reasons effectively making useful distinctions.
25points
Supports most ideas with effective examples and details, finds suitable balance between references to personal and external evidence, makes key distinctions.
21 points
Presents ideas in general terms support for ideas is inconsistent or unsuitably personal or distant, some distinctions need clarifications, reasoning unclear.
19 points
Most ideas unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, unclear use of distinctions or levels of generality
15 points
Ideas are unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, no distinctions between levels of generality,
0 points
LANGUAGE 25%Employs words with fluency, develops concise standard English sentences, balances a variety of sentence structures effectively
25points
Word forms are correct, sentence structure is effective, applies standard English grammar and mechanics
21 points
Word forms and sentence structures are adequate to convey basic meaning, errors cause noticeable distraction
19 points
Word use is weak, sentence structures are uneven, errors are very distracting
15 points
Word use is unclear, sentence structures inadequate for clarity, errors seriously distracting
0 points

Chapter 2: Mini-Case Insight into Consumer Decision Making for TVs
Writing Requirements
1-2 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Grading Criteria:
PURPOSE & AUDIENCE 25%Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, format and citation in APA style (where relevant) effectively25points
Adheres to purpose, Fulfills assignment, shows adequate understanding of key issues, style is appropriate to intended audience, presentation is readable, format is correct.
21 points
Waivers in purpose, incompletely addresses assigned topics or directions, shows more need to examine issues, style varies, and visual presentation is ragged.
19 points
Purpose unclear, failure to address topic or directions, weak group of issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
15 points
Purpose unclear, does not address topic or directions, does not address issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
0 points
ORGANIZATION 25%Focuses consistently on clearly expresses central idea, uses paragraph structure and transition guide reader effectively
25points
Central idea is clear, paragraph structure is adequate, some problems with consistency, logic or transitions
21 points
Loose focus on central idea, contains some repetition and digression, structure needs work
19 points
Does not focus on central idea, contains many repetitions and digression, very weak structure.
15 points
No central idea, no clear logic or focus, many repetitions or digressions, lack of structure
0 points
DEVELOPMENT 25%Explores ideas vigorously, supports points fully using a balance of subjectivity and objective evidence, reasons effectively making useful distinctions.
25points
Supports most ideas with effective examples and details, finds suitable balance between references to personal and external evidence, makes key distinctions.
21 points
Presents ideas in general terms support for ideas is inconsistent or unsuitably personal or distant, some distinctions need clarifications, reasoning unclear.
19 points
Most ideas unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, unclear use of distinctions or levels of generality
15 points
Ideas are unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, no distinctions between levels of generality,
0 points
LANGUAGE 25%Employs words with fluency, develops concise standard English sentences, balances a variety of sentence structures effectively
25points
Word forms are correct, sentence structure is effective, applies standard English grammar and mechanics
21 points
Word forms and sentence structures are adequate to convey basic meaning, errors cause noticeable distraction
19 points
Word use is weak, sentence structures are uneven, errors are very distracting
15 points
Word use is unclear, sentence structures inadequate for clarity, errors seriously distracting
0 points

APA FORMAT TITLE & REFERENCE PAGE DOUBLE SPACED 12pt. FONT 6 PAGES For Part 1 of this project you will watch the documentary, Kind Hearted Woman (5 hrs), taking as many notes as you deem necessary to highlight the facts, key problems, and strengths of the all identified family members. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/kind-hearted-woman/? You will be working to identify strengths and challenges for each individual from a biopsychosocial perspective as well has unique strengths and challenges they have as a family. Your notes should be organized in a way the makes sense to you and are understandable to anyone who may need to review your work. Examples may include organizing by individual and family, organizing by identified issue (physical, psychological, medical, educational, work, criminal, etc.) Your notes are the foundation of any case management service you provide so it is important to be as thorough as possible. There may be items that seem small but could prove essential to the overall services being provided to the family so be as detailed as possible. Using your notes and the attached case management assessment tools, we will: PART 2: 1. Identify key problems, why they exist, and how they impact the individual or family. 2. Explore possible solutions or changes that are needed for each individual. Students can use course readings, discussions, their knowledge of local service resources, or conduct an internet search of services that have been used for the identified problems. Live sessions will be held during the week for students to ask questions, get some direction, and share ideas with each other on how they would identify resources. Case management is not meant to be a solo activity, use your classmates! 3. Select a ″best″ solution for each individual′s problem. Students will be expected to provide supporting evidence, pros, cons, and determine if the solution is realistic for the individual′s current needs. The solution should also include any additional requirements to implement (referrals to other agencies, transportation, funding availability, etc.) and what the expected outcome is (what does success look like?). This is an opportunity to be really creative and think outside the box (cliché′, I know)! Some of the best case managers are those who can create solutions that maybe haven′t been tried or even thought of before. Don′t be afraid to put forth an idea that could benefit the family. This is also why focusing on a family′s strengths can be really useful. Strengths can become their own solutions if we use them in a beneficial way Part 3: Is combining Part 1 & 2 together (Assessment Part) PART 4: The final step of the case study is to use your notes, assessment, and goals plan to build the case study analysis. The following template will be used to create your final report. I. Introduction (Just a Quick Overview of what I am about to read) – Identify the key individuals in the case and the primary individuals who are the target clients. – Identify the key problems and issues in the case study – This is an opportunity to introduce your family, the issues that you will be addressing in working with them, and proposed outcomes. – This section will be a snapshot of what you will be presenting in the body of the document II. Background – Set the scene: background information, relevant facts, and the most important issues. – Demonstrate that you researched the problems in the case study III. Evaluation of the Case – Outline the various pieces of the case study that you are focusing on. – Evaluate these pieces by discussing what is working and what is not working (strengths and concerns) – State why these parts of the case study are or are not working well. – Is there information missing from the assessment that might impact the work you do with the individuals or family? IV. Proposed Solutions/Changes – Provide specific and realistic solutions(s) or changes needed – Explain why this solution was chosen – Support this solution with solid evidence, research, such as: – Concepts from class (text readings, discussions, lectures) – Outside research – you will need to document your sources to avoid plagiarism. – Personal experience and knowledge V. Recommendations – Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution – If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues – What should be done and should do it? Your analysis will be written in APA format, double-spaced, 12 pt font. There is an APA template located in Microsoft Word that I will cover in a live session as well as how to properly reference your source material. The analysis will be no less than five pages, not including the title and reference pages.Requirement: 6 pages

Chapter 6: Mini-Case Hotel Flowchart and Blueprint
Writing Requirements
3-4 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Grading Criteria:
PURPOSE & AUDIENCE 25%Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, format and citation in APA style (where relevant) effectively25points
Adheres to purpose, Fulfills assignment, shows adequate understanding of key issues, style is appropriate to intended audience, presentation is readable, format is correct.
21 points
Waivers in purpose, incompletely addresses assigned topics or directions, shows more need to examine issues, style varies, and visual presentation is ragged.
19 points
Purpose unclear, failure to address topic or directions, weak group of issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
15 points
Purpose unclear, does not address topic or directions, does not address issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
0 points
ORGANIZATION 25%Focuses consistently on clearly expresses central idea, uses paragraph structure and transition guide reader effectively
25points
Central idea is clear, paragraph structure is adequate, some problems with consistency, logic or transitions
21 points
Loose focus on central idea, contains some repetition and digression, structure needs work
19 points
Does not focus on central idea, contains many repetitions and digression, very weak structure.
15 points
No central idea, no clear logic or focus, many repetitions or digressions, lack of structure
0 points
DEVELOPMENT 25%Explores ideas vigorously, supports points fully using a balance of subjectivity and objective evidence, reasons effectively making useful distinctions.
25points
Supports most ideas with effective examples and details, finds suitable balance between references to personal and external evidence, makes key distinctions.
21 points
Presents ideas in general terms support for ideas is inconsistent or unsuitably personal or distant, some distinctions need clarifications, reasoning unclear.
19 points
Most ideas unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, unclear use of distinctions or levels of generality
15 points
Ideas are unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, no distinctions between levels of generality,
0 points
LANGUAGE 25%Employs words with fluency, develops concise standard English sentences, balances a variety of sentence structures effectively
25points
Word forms are correct, sentence structure is effective, applies standard English grammar and mechanics
21 points
Word forms and sentence structures are adequate to convey basic meaning, errors cause noticeable distraction
19 points
Word use is weak, sentence structures are uneven, errors are very distracting
15 points
Word use is unclear, sentence structures inadequate for clarity, errors seriously distracting
0 points

Chapter 2: Mini-Case Insight into Consumer Decision Making for TVs
Writing Requirements
1-2 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Grading Criteria:
PURPOSE & AUDIENCE 25%Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, format and citation in APA style (where relevant) effectively25points
Adheres to purpose, Fulfills assignment, shows adequate understanding of key issues, style is appropriate to intended audience, presentation is readable, format is correct.
21 points
Waivers in purpose, incompletely addresses assigned topics or directions, shows more need to examine issues, style varies, and visual presentation is ragged.
19 points
Purpose unclear, failure to address topic or directions, weak group of issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
15 points
Purpose unclear, does not address topic or directions, does not address issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
0 points
ORGANIZATION 25%Focuses consistently on clearly expresses central idea, uses paragraph structure and transition guide reader effectively
25points
Central idea is clear, paragraph structure is adequate, some problems with consistency, logic or transitions
21 points
Loose focus on central idea, contains some repetition and digression, structure needs work
19 points
Does not focus on central idea, contains many repetitions and digression, very weak structure.
15 points
No central idea, no clear logic or focus, many repetitions or digressions, lack of structure
0 points
DEVELOPMENT 25%Explores ideas vigorously, supports points fully using a balance of subjectivity and objective evidence, reasons effectively making useful distinctions.
25points
Supports most ideas with effective examples and details, finds suitable balance between references to personal and external evidence, makes key distinctions.
21 points
Presents ideas in general terms support for ideas is inconsistent or unsuitably personal or distant, some distinctions need clarifications, reasoning unclear.
19 points
Most ideas unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, unclear use of distinctions or levels of generality
15 points
Ideas are unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, no distinctions between levels of generality,
0 points
LANGUAGE 25%Employs words with fluency, develops concise standard English sentences, balances a variety of sentence structures effectively
25points
Word forms are correct, sentence structure is effective, applies standard English grammar and mechanics
21 points
Word forms and sentence structures are adequate to convey basic meaning, errors cause noticeable distraction
19 points
Word use is weak, sentence structures are uneven, errors are very distracting
15 points
Word use is unclear, sentence structures inadequate for clarity, errors seriously distracting
0 points