Category: Case Studies

Instructions:
Use Excel templates and select “Simple Gantt Chart” as your template.
Enter the tasks from your WBS and the stakeholders in the “assigned to” field from your responsibility matrix onto the chart.
Add start and end dates to complete your Gantt chart.
Save the Excel file (with your name and the class) and upload to this page.

Question:
Analyze a real-world case study where a company or organization faced a significant ethical dilemma. Describe the background, the decisions made, and their consequences. Evaluate the situation using ethical frameworks such as utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics, and propose alternative solutions that could have better balanced stakeholder interests. Provide specific recommendations for avoiding similar issues in the future.

Step 1: Download the attachment to your local computer
Step 2: Rename the file to include your name. Example T. Cherry Responsibility Matrix Fall 2024
Step 3: Complete the following sections:
Enter at least 4 activities from your WBS
Enter at least 5 stakeholder roles across the top
Enter whether the stakeholder is responsible, has approval authority, to be consulted or informed for that activity in the boxes
Step 4: Upload the edited version to this page

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
– NO PLAGERISIM OR AI
– All citations need to be from google scholar
– use the provided info and screenshots, and cite the book – Leadership, 6th Edition; by Lussier and Achua; edition: 6th; ISBN: 9781285866352
Address the five questions associated with the chapter 11 Opening Case Application: Larry Page on page 396 in a three to five full page paper from top to bottom (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages). Include at least three peer reviewed sources published within the last 5 years found in the google scholar properly cited and referenced. Assignment should be APA compliance.
Please use this strategy when you analyze a case:
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub steps a and b.
Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
Select a course of action.
Design and implementation plan/schedule.
Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)
Writing Requirements
3–4 full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
Requirements: 3–4 pages full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list) Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
– NO PLAGERISIM OR AI
– All citations need to be from google scholar
– use the provided info and screenshots, and cite the book – Leadership, 6th Edition; by Lussier and Achua; edition: 6th; ISBN: 9781285866352
Address the five questions associated with the chapter 11 Opening Case Application: Larry Page on page 396 in a three to five full page paper from top to bottom (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages). Include at least three peer reviewed sources published within the last 5 years found in the google scholar properly cited and referenced. Assignment should be APA compliance.
Please use this strategy when you analyze a case:
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub steps a and b.
Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
Select a course of action.
Design and implementation plan/schedule.
Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)
Writing Requirements
3–4 full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
Requirements: 3–4 pages full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list) Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
– NO PLAGERISIM OR AI
– All citations need to be from google scholar
– use the provided info and screenshots, and cite the book – Leadership, 6th Edition; by Lussier and Achua; edition: 6th; ISBN: 9781285866352
Address the five questions associated with the chapter 11 Opening Case Application: Larry Page on page 396 in a three to five full page paper from top to bottom (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages). Include at least three peer reviewed sources published within the last 5 years found in the google scholar properly cited and referenced. Assignment should be APA compliance.
Please use this strategy when you analyze a case:
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub steps a and b.
Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
Select a course of action.
Design and implementation plan/schedule.
Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)
Writing Requirements
3–4 full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
Requirements: 3–4 pages full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list) Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
– NO PLAGERISIM OR AI
– All citations need to be from google scholar
– use the provided info and screenshots, and cite the book – Leadership, 6th Edition; by Lussier and Achua; edition: 6th; ISBN: 9781285866352
Address the five questions associated with the chapter 11 Opening Case Application: Larry Page on page 396 in a three to five full page paper from top to bottom (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages). Include at least three peer reviewed sources published within the last 5 years found in the google scholar properly cited and referenced. Assignment should be APA compliance.
Please use this strategy when you analyze a case:
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub steps a and b.
Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
Select a course of action.
Design and implementation plan/schedule.
Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)
Writing Requirements
3–4 full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
Requirements: 3–4 pages full pages in length from top to bottom (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list) Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

Assignment Instructions:
For each of the five scenarios provided below, choose the problem-solving method you believe is the most effective. In your response, include the following:
Identify the problem presented in the scenario.
Choose a problem-solving method (from the five listed above) that you believe would best resolve the issue.
Explain your reasoning for choosing that method.
Provide a real-life example from your experience that mimics the situation and shows how you applied (or could have) the same problem-solving methodProblem-Solving Strategies:
Before starting the assignment, familiarize yourself with the following five problem-solving methods. Each method offers a unique approach to resolving issues, and your task is to select the most suitable one for each scenario:Combine and Redefine: This strategy involves taking two or more ideas, combining them, and redefining the problem to include a new approach. It helps in cases where multiple ideas are conflicting or incomplete.
Solve Something Simpler: If the problem seems too complex, break it down into smaller, more manageable parts and solve those first. Once you’ve solved the more straightforward issues, you can return to the main problem with more clarity.
Interrogate and Extrapolate: This method involves asking questions to analyze the issue deeply and extrapolating patterns or solutions based on the information gathered. It helps when you dig deeper into the problem to understand it fully.
Sidestep the Issue: Sometimes, instead of tackling the problem directly, you can avoid it or work around it by changing the approach or the conditions. This strategy helps in situations where addressing the issue head-on isn’t feasible.
Reverse Engineering involves working backward from the solution to understand the process or system. It’s useful to understand how something works by deconstructing it step-by-step.
Scenarios:
The Sports Event Challenge
You are part of a planning committee for your school’s upcoming sports event, and one obstacle is creating enough space for all the participants to register efficiently. The registration area is cramped, and there is not enough space to accommodate all students. You’re worried that this will slow the process and create frustration among participants.
The Presentation Problem
You’re working on a group presentation for class, but your group can’t agree on a single topic because everyone has different ideas. The deadline is approaching, and the group is still stuck.
The Math Assignment Roadblock
You are working on a complex math problem for homework, but you feel stuck and unsure how to approach it. The problem seems overwhelming, and you’re not sure where to start.
The Art Design Dilemma
You’ve been assigned to design a logo for a school project, but you’re struggling to make your design original and stand out. You’re looking at modern design styles but feel uninspired.
The Broken Device Issue
You’re helping a friend fix their smartphone that isn’t charging correctly. Although you have no experience with phone repairs, you’ve noticed similar issues with other devices.
Example Response:
Scenario: The Presentation Problem
Chosen Method: Combine and Redefine
Reasoning: In this case, the group has multiple ideas but can’t agree on a single topic. By combining elements from each idea, the group can create a broader topic that everyone can contribute to. This helps redefine the problem by making it inclusive of all viewpoints.
Real-life Example: When I had to work on a group project for a science fair, everyone had different interests. We combined ideas from chemistry, physics, and biology to create an interdisciplinary project. This way, everyone felt included, and we had a stronger project.
Submission Instructions:
Write a short response (150-200 words) for each scenario.
Identify the chosen problem-solving method, explain your reasoning, and provide a real-life example.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This is for a graduate school in school psychology student for Trauma and Neurobiology course.
The instructions:
1. find 3 different scholarly source articles of studies of neurofeedback and to summarize them 2 of the sources must be of children and 1 of adults.
I want you to include all of the following components of all 3 articles based on the articles:
– a. Summary of the entire research of EACH OF THE 3 articles and explain it and write it as if you had to teach the article information in the studies to me. so be very detailed and get all information of article very specifcially and in detail mentioning all variables they looked at, all scales, all measures, wha specifically was done, how it was done, who did it, who was involved, how it happened, where it took place.
– b. purpose of studies and research questions – SPECIFICALLY. include all variables researched in each and what they were researching
– c. participants- who they were, how many- was there control group? what was the control? how many groups? randomized control group or not?
d. diversity of participants ? gender difference if any? diversity in studies? where it has been studied? on which population? which disorder was it looking at? RESEARCH THIS FOR THE 3 STUDIES AND IN GENERAL
e. methods of study / what were measures used, scales used, tests used, and procedures – very specific as if you had to explain and teach it to me
f. results of study – specifically what were the variables they wre researching in study and what was the effect for each variable
g. Discuss the limitations of the research about neurofeedback in each of the studies and specifically what the research says about it and then the future directions of research
h. make a powerpoint presentation for it. as if to present it to my class with no more than 4 slides and include talking points as well as information to include into the powerpoint for it. this is for graduate school so make it professional. include all 3 article information into it. write the number of studies showed its effectiveness and cite them and the numbers that showed its ineffectiveness and cite them. include the limitations and future directions into powerpoint as well
THEN, IN ADDITION TO THE 3 ARTICLES DO THE FOLLOWING:
YOU MUST LOOK AT OTHER ARTICLE AND RESEARCH AS WELL TO FIND WHAT RESEARCH SAYS IS LIMITATIONS OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND WHY. MUST DISCUSS HOW MANY PARTICIPANTS IN STUDIES WHERE IT SHOWS LARGE EFFECT SIZE AND HOW MANY WHEN IT DOES NOT SHOW EFFECT SIZE. DISCUSS WHAT RESEARCH DISCUSSES FUTURE RESEARCH SHOULD ENTAIL AS WELL.
RESEARCH NEUROFEEDBACK IN GENERAL AND DISCUSS NUMBER OF STUDIES THAT SHOWED ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND SHOW NUMBER OF STUDIES SHOWED ITS INEFFECTVENESS AND DISCUSS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FOUND BETWEEN THEM AND WHY IT EVEN SHOWS THERE IS EFFECT SIZE AT ALL. BASICALLY GOAL IS TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER NEUROFEEDBACK HAS ENOUGH RESEARCH TO SAY IT IS AN EBI. IT HAS BEEN VERY POPULAR AMONG MANY DESPITE RESEARCH SHOWING THAT IT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE RESEARCH SHOWING AN INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE WITH NEUROFEEDBACK USE, DISCUSS WHY THAT IS AND IF IT CAN BE CONCLUDED TO BE EFFECTIVE WHY OR WHY NOT. BACK UP WITH LIABLE RESEARCH ONLY!
DO APA 7TH EDITION WORK CITED
NO PLAGIARISM!!!!
I PUT 4 PAGES FOR IT BUT THERE ISNT A PAGE COUNT BECAUSE IT IS NOT AN ESSAY BUT MUST ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS IN DETAIL AND EXPLAIN IT IN MANNER THAT I HAVE ALLL ASPECTS OF THE INFORMATION SUFFICIENTLY ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH AND EXPLAIN IT. ALSO DO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AS WELL.
Look into these aspects when doing research and discss it in addition to other aspects: Individual variability in response
Lack of standardization
Ethical and safety concerns
Integration with AI and machine learning
Potential for personalized neurofeedback
Please discuss all aspects and discuss the research in detail including variables measured and how they were measured using what and all the information
Basically need to cover all aspects and in addition to the 3 articles say what he research is saying about neurofeedback, is it effective? is it really actually effective or do studies have small sample size showing small increase in effect? give that input and limitations of research of neurofeedback and future direction of research
Its not a research paper. It is basically for a presentation I am asking you to do all the research for a presentation for me to know and understand all research so you need to fully do the research and explain all aspects and then also do a powerpoint presentation.
When you are looking at generally the research and limitations and how many effective studies and how many did not show effectiveness in improvement with neurofeedback, discuss ones from back then as well to show evolution in though if any, including when it was first researched. Also, discuss all variables of all studies like for example if it researched neurofeedback effectiveness for ADHD kids but improved processing speed and attention but not impulsivity do so that way. be very specific.
That it is all aspects a-h for the 3 articles and then separately in addition how many effectiveness studies how many not effectiveness studies and go into it and discuss why it showed effectiveness – (smaller study showing smaller effect size but large rigorous studies not showing any at all) be a skeptic and discuss whether it should be an EBI or not, is it actually scientifically proven to be effective or not? does it really work? or is it placebo effect as well? discuss what research says about that. and then future directions of the research as well.
in what setting are they studied? are they only in hospitals and that is why they cannot be applied to clinical setting or can they? do the studies show effctiveness because of that or would it work in clinical setting?
Look at if it helps those with trauma and ptsd if there is any research on that
Requirements: Minimum 4 Full Page PPT Script + PPT Slides Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and References
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This is for a graduate school in school psychology student for Trauma and Neurobiology course.
The instructions:
1. find 3 different scholarly source articles of studies of neurofeedback and to summarize them 2 of the sources must be of children and 1 of adults.
I want you to include all of the following components of all 3 articles based on the articles:
– a. Summary of the entire research of EACH OF THE 3 articles and explain it and write it as if you had to teach the article information in the studies to me. so be very detailed and get all information of article very specifcially and in detail mentioning all variables they looked at, all scales, all measures, wha specifically was done, how it was done, who did it, who was involved, how it happened, where it took place.
– b. purpose of studies and research questions – SPECIFICALLY. include all variables researched in each and what they were researching
– c. participants- who they were, how many- was there control group? what was the control? how many groups? randomized control group or not?
d. diversity of participants ? gender difference if any? diversity in studies? where it has been studied? on which population? which disorder was it looking at? RESEARCH THIS FOR THE 3 STUDIES AND IN GENERAL
e. methods of study / what were measures used, scales used, tests used, and procedures – very specific as if you had to explain and teach it to me
f. results of study – specifically what were the variables they wre researching in study and what was the effect for each variable
g. Discuss the limitations of the research about neurofeedback in each of the studies and specifically what the research says about it and then the future directions of research
h. make a powerpoint presentation for it. as if to present it to my class with no more than 4 slides and include talking points as well as information to include into the powerpoint for it. this is for graduate school so make it professional. include all 3 article information into it. write the number of studies showed its effectiveness and cite them and the numbers that showed its ineffectiveness and cite them. include the limitations and future directions into powerpoint as well
THEN, IN ADDITION TO THE 3 ARTICLES DO THE FOLLOWING:
YOU MUST LOOK AT OTHER ARTICLE AND RESEARCH AS WELL TO FIND WHAT RESEARCH SAYS IS LIMITATIONS OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND WHY. MUST DISCUSS HOW MANY PARTICIPANTS IN STUDIES WHERE IT SHOWS LARGE EFFECT SIZE AND HOW MANY WHEN IT DOES NOT SHOW EFFECT SIZE. DISCUSS WHAT RESEARCH DISCUSSES FUTURE RESEARCH SHOULD ENTAIL AS WELL.
RESEARCH NEUROFEEDBACK IN GENERAL AND DISCUSS NUMBER OF STUDIES THAT SHOWED ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND SHOW NUMBER OF STUDIES SHOWED ITS INEFFECTVENESS AND DISCUSS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FOUND BETWEEN THEM AND WHY IT EVEN SHOWS THERE IS EFFECT SIZE AT ALL. BASICALLY GOAL IS TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER NEUROFEEDBACK HAS ENOUGH RESEARCH TO SAY IT IS AN EBI. IT HAS BEEN VERY POPULAR AMONG MANY DESPITE RESEARCH SHOWING THAT IT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE RESEARCH SHOWING AN INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE WITH NEUROFEEDBACK USE, DISCUSS WHY THAT IS AND IF IT CAN BE CONCLUDED TO BE EFFECTIVE WHY OR WHY NOT. BACK UP WITH LIABLE RESEARCH ONLY!
DO APA 7TH EDITION WORK CITED
NO PLAGIARISM!!!!
I PUT 4 PAGES FOR IT BUT THERE ISNT A PAGE COUNT BECAUSE IT IS NOT AN ESSAY BUT MUST ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS IN DETAIL AND EXPLAIN IT IN MANNER THAT I HAVE ALLL ASPECTS OF THE INFORMATION SUFFICIENTLY ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH AND EXPLAIN IT. ALSO DO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AS WELL.
Look into these aspects when doing research and discss it in addition to other aspects: Individual variability in response
Lack of standardization
Ethical and safety concerns
Integration with AI and machine learning
Potential for personalized neurofeedback
Please discuss all aspects and discuss the research in detail including variables measured and how they were measured using what and all the information
Basically need to cover all aspects and in addition to the 3 articles say what he research is saying about neurofeedback, is it effective? is it really actually effective or do studies have small sample size showing small increase in effect? give that input and limitations of research of neurofeedback and future direction of research
Its not a research paper. It is basically for a presentation I am asking you to do all the research for a presentation for me to know and understand all research so you need to fully do the research and explain all aspects and then also do a powerpoint presentation.
When you are looking at generally the research and limitations and how many effective studies and how many did not show effectiveness in improvement with neurofeedback, discuss ones from back then as well to show evolution in though if any, including when it was first researched. Also, discuss all variables of all studies like for example if it researched neurofeedback effectiveness for ADHD kids but improved processing speed and attention but not impulsivity do so that way. be very specific.
That it is all aspects a-h for the 3 articles and then separately in addition how many effectiveness studies how many not effectiveness studies and go into it and discuss why it showed effectiveness – (smaller study showing smaller effect size but large rigorous studies not showing any at all) be a skeptic and discuss whether it should be an EBI or not, is it actually scientifically proven to be effective or not? does it really work? or is it placebo effect as well? discuss what research says about that. and then future directions of the research as well.
in what setting are they studied? are they only in hospitals and that is why they cannot be applied to clinical setting or can they? do the studies show effctiveness because of that or would it work in clinical setting?
Look at if it helps those with trauma and ptsd if there is any research on that
Requirements: Minimum 4 Full Page PPT Script + PPT Slides Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and References
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool