Category: Biology

Dear Writer,
This is a 1500-word research report that needs to be written. However, I am in a group of four students, so the task is split into four. Thus, you should write a maximum of 400 words for this task. I have chosen 3 Australian CIAs for this task. Pick any two of the three that you like and use it for this task. You must include 2 annotated references.
Assoc. Prof. Arun Azad (2022 row 105) –
Grant: Optimising radiopharmaceutical therapy to improve clinical outcomes in advanced prostate cancer: They will lead innovative clinical trials focusing on PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. By analyzing trial scans and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), they aim to understand why some patients respond better to these treatments, ultimately improving therapies for advanced prostate cancer.
Research articles:
Future directions in systemic treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36029329/) AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH ARTICLE MELBOURNE
——————————————————————————————
Dr Ruth Pidsley (2021 row 345) –
The grant title “Decoding the epigenome of the tumour microenvironment for improved patient outcomes in prostate cancer” is focused on studying molecular changes, specifically in the epigenome, within the environment surrounding a tumor. This research aims to better understand how these changes influence prostate cancer and to use that knowledge to improve patient outcomes.
Research Articles (PMC):
Enduring epigenetic landmarks define the cancer microenvironment. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29650553/)
——————————————————————————————————–
Assoc Prof Renea Taylor (2021 row 438) –
The grant title “Developing novel CAR T cell therapy approaches to treat prostate cancer” is related to molecular biology. CAR T cell therapy involves genetically modifying a patient’s T cells at the molecular level to enable them to better recognize and attack cancer cells. This research focuses on creating new methods to enhance this molecular-based treatment for prostate cancer.
Research Articles (PMC):
Alterations in the methylome of the stromal tumour microenvironment signal the presence and severity of prostate cancer (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32188493/)
FOXA2 rewires AP-1 for transcriptional reprogramming and lineage plasticity in prostate cancer
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38851846/)
________________________________________________________________________
The Task:
Each group is to complete a Research Report that clearly and concisely summarises the research topic from the computer classes that relate to a particular cancer, disease, or condition. The maximum length of the text narrative to be 1500 words. Figures legends, tables, in-text citations, references, and reference annotations do not count towards this word limit. NO COVER SHEET An assignment cover sheet is not required since the electronic submission of the assignment through Turnitin covers issues of authenticity and associated declarations previously stated on the Cover sheet. One mark will be deducted if is a coversheet is included. TITLE PAGE Include a Title Page with the following information Title: Not More than 140 Characters Including Spaces Authors: Group Member Names Affiliations: Home campus and institution name Abstract: The abstract should be one paragraph of 200-250 words. It should be written in a more general style than your main text that is comprehensible to a general reader. Include background content specific to your subject area, refer to each section of your essay and include a concluding sentence. Do not include any references in in the abstract. The Title page does not contribute to the overall word count. A Western coversheet is not required. MAIN TEXT The main text of your Research Report should be structured to include four (4) sections. Use an informative sub-heading for each of these. Use a single column for the entire document – do not use multiple columns. Be sure to refer to any Figures or Tables in the main text when your narrative covers information represented therein. Each section of the review must include peer reviewed sources. FIRST SECTION With a meaningful title (~200 words): From an Australia point of view, clearly state the rational of why the research area is considered to be priority. What benefit does the research return in relation to the prevalence or severity of the disease in Australia? Include factual data taken from peer reviewed literature. SECOND SECTION With a meaningful title (~400 words): Clearly describe the research outcomes for the CIA listed Australian scientists. Describe how these different scientists are researching the topic using different techniques and approaches. Refer to the figure that you have constructed, e.g. as shown in Figure 1. Also do not forget to include an appendix section at the end of your report that shows the images/sources used to make the figure. Don’t forget to include a descriptive figure legend that describes all aspects of your figure, the figure legend does not contribute to the overall word count. THIRD SECTION With a meaningful title (~400 words): PAGE 36 Describe, or compare or contrast any molecular/cellular pathways involved in the topic area. If pathways for the condition are not documented in the literature then describe the current understanding of the causes of the condition at the molecular level (referring to individual genes, proteins or genetic factors etc). This section describes all aspects of the disease and condition from any of the peerreviewed literature you have found (including those who are not based in Australia) FORTH SECTION With a meaningful title (~400 words): Describe any targeted medicine or potential treatments for the cancer, disease or condition, focus on medicine that were developed through rational drug design. Discuss the medicine in relation to the key molecular pathway or genetic factors you have described. Highlight in the prior Figure where these act in the pathway or elsewhere the cell. Do not discuss none-molecular treatments suce as surgical removal, radiotherapy or other generic treatments. Note. You are encouraged to discuss potential treatments described in the research papers, these do not need to be available in the clinic. TAG YOUR IN-TEXT CITATIONS Double check that the reference you have collected include at least the following for the Research Report. Refer to this as the 8+4+8+1+2 rule. Added these together to give the Research Report a minimum of 23 references in total. Use the Author Date format for intext citations and referencing based on Harvard style. For a guide to Harvard style follow this link: WSU Harvard style 8: [CIA] Include at least 2 Australian primary research articles for each group member with different authors who are CIAs in the NHMRC data. If there are 4 group members the report would contain papers from at least 8 different CIAs. 4: [REV] Include least 4 review articles related by keyword to these research articles. Each group member should contribute at least 1 review article. 8: [FOR] or [BAC] Include at least 8 research or review articles found by search forward or backward. 1: [BD] Include data from at least 1 referenced Biological Database. 2: [TM] Include at least 2 peer-reviewed articles that specifically report on Treatment or Medicine For the in-text citation of these references, include the above tags, make each tag coloured and bold to indicate the type of reference you are referring to. Example e.g. “It has been shown that foo is associated with the activity of bar (Smith 2022) [CIA] and this builds upon prior studies that show an increase in the severity of the disease in the absence of bar (Jones 2015) [BAC].” ANNOTATE YOUR REFERENCE LIST Include 8 annotations in your Reference List Include only one list of references. Within this single list annotate 4 of the [CIA] papers and 4 of the [FOR] or [BAC] articles. Use approximately 200 words for each annotation. These annotation are to inform the reader of the strengths of the papers or why you chose it in preference to another other paper you could have referenced, why was it better for you? Why was it relevant in your field of study. What is its relationships of the paper to other studies in the field?
1.1 Main Text First Section (400 words)
An excellent summary of both why funding was awarded in relation to the Priority Area’s and how benefit is returned from funding with respect to the disease.
Peer reviewed articles factual data – As many as you need to make the case.
50 words per person answering:
From an Australia point of view, clearly state the rational of why the research area is considered to be priority. What benefit does the research return in relation to the prevalence or severity of the disease in Australia? Include factual data taken from peer reviewed literature.
1.2 Main Text Second Section (400 words) – Everyone
An excellent summary of the impact of contributions made by Australian scientists towards understanding the disease.
Clearly describe the research outcomes for the CIA listed Australian scientists. Describe how these different scientists are researching the topic using different techniques and approaches. Refer to the figure that you have constructed, e.g. as shown in Figure 1. Also do not forget to include an appendix section at the end of your report that shows the images/sources used to make the figure. Don’t forget to include a descriptive figure legend that describes all aspects of your figure, the figure legend does not contribute to the overall word count.
2 CIA’s each person = 8 total
An excellent summary of the impact of contributions made by Australian scientists towards understanding the disease.
1 constructed diagram
Proteins for the diagram:
EDARADD
MYBL2
IDH1
1.3 Main Text Third Section: An excellent summary of the key molecular components involved taken from research data, wider literature and biological databases.
Talk about at least one in detail.
Describe, or compare or contrast any molecular/cellular pathways involved in the topic area. If pathways for the condition are not documented in the literature then describe the current understanding of the causes of the condition at the molecular level (referring to individual genes, proteins or genetic factors etc). This section describes all aspects of the disease and condition from any of the peerreviewed literature you have found (including those who are not based in Australia)
yAn excellent summary of the key molecular components involved taken from research data, wider literature and biological databases.
Main Text Fourth Section: An excellent summary of up to date specific medicines that are in development or used to treat the condition in Australia. Treatments relate to the described molecular components.
Reference List (Annotated)
————————————————————————————————————-
I provided the word limit for each section so divide that by 4. If you can create a nice diagram as well with figure legends and some figures/tables as well. Also a short 200 word abstract and a good title for our report. Figures legends, tables, in-text citations, references, and reference annotations do not count towards this word limit. PLEASE NOTE: As the word limit is short per person; you can include the rest of the information in the figure legends. For more information on what we have done as a group so far, please visit this google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16kYE_3SWgiXWpnvBl35wE6zxNGKiivcY1EEORJDryf4/edit?usp=sharing
I will use you again for the same task but an oral presentation. Thank you!

Biologically Important Molecules Lab and Post lab
32 OF 32 QUESTIONS REMAINING
Assignment Content
Question 1
Question 1 pg.41:Examine figure 6.2a. Which groups of a glucose molecule are involved in forming a polysaccharide? Shade the functional groups with a pencil.
Question 2
1.02 PointsComplete and attach Table 6.1 Solutions and Color for (1) Benedict’s Test for reducing Sugars, and (2) Iodine Test for Starch on pg.42 to the Additional Content Section at the end of this lab.Yes, I attached Table 6.1No, I failed to attach Table 6.1
Question 3
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.1 pg.42:2.a Which of the solutions is a positive control? Negative control?
Question 4
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.1 pg.42:2.b Which is a reducing sugar, sucrose or glucose? How do you know?
Question 5
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.2 pg.42:3.a Which of the solutions is a positive control? Which is a negative control?
Question 6
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.2 pg.42:3.c In what parts of a plant is the most starch typically stored?
Question 7
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.2 pg.42:3.d What are the functions of carbohydrates in living organisms?
Question 8
0.51 PointsQuestion 4 pg. 44:Examine figure 6.6. Shade with a pencil the reactive amino and carboxyl groups on the three common amino acids shown.
Question 9
1.02 PointsComplete and attach Table 6.2 Solutions and Color Reactions for the Biuret Test for Proteins on pg.44 to the Additional Content Section at the end of this lab.Yes, I attached table 6.2No, I failed to attach table 6.2
Question 10
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.3 pg.45:5.a Which of the solutions is a positive control? Which is a negative control?
Question 11
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.3 pg.45:5.b Which contains more protein (C-N bonds), egg albumen or honey? How can you tell?
Question 12
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.3 pg.45:5.c Do free amino acids have peptide bonds?
Question 13
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.3 pg.45:d. What are the functions of proteins in living organisms?
Question 14
0.51 PointsQuestion 6 pg.45:Examine figure 6.8. What are the reactive groups of the fatty acids?
Question 15
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.4 pg. 46:7. What do you conclude about the solubility of lipids in polar solvents such as water? In nonpolar solvents such as acetone?
Question 16
1.02 PointsComplete and attach Table 6.3 Solutions and Color Reactions for the Sudan IV Test for Lipids on pg.46 to the Additional Content Section at the end of this lab.Yes, I attached table 6.3No, I failed to attach table 6.3
Question 17
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 46:8.a. Is salad oil soluble in water?
Question 18
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 46:8.b Compare tubes 1 and 2. What is the distribution of the dye with respect to the separated water and oil?
Question 19
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 46:8.c What observation indicates a positive test for lipids?
Question 20
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 46:8.d Does honey contain much lipid?
Question 21
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 46:8.e Lipids supply more than twice as many calories er gram as do carbohydrates. Based on you results, which contains more calories, oil or honey?
Question 22
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 48:9.a Which of the food products that you tested contain large amounts of lipid?
Question 23
0.51 PointsProcedure 6.5 pg. 48:9.b What are the functions of lipids in living organisms?
Question 24
1.01 PointsComplete and attach Table 6.4 Materials and Grease-Spot Reaction as a Test for Lipid Content on pg.48 to the Additional Content Section at the end of this lab.Yes, I attached table 6.4No, I failed to attach table 6.4
Question 25
2.04 PointsComplete and attach Table 6.7 Chemical Testing to Identify an Unknown on pg.51 to the Additional Content Section at the end of this lab. Use the turkey baby food results from all the test to fill out the sample unknown, then find the controls for each individual test to compare to the unknown.Yes, I attached table 6.7No, I failed to attach table 6.7
Question 26
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:1.What is the importance of a positive control? What is the importance of a negative control?
Question 27
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:2.What controls were used in each procedure that you preformed in today’s lab?
Question 28
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:3.Why did you include controls in all of your tests?
Question 29
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:4.Are controls always necessary? Why or why not?
Question 30
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:5.What is a phospholipid? What functions do phospholipids have in cells?
Question 31
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:6.What does a “dehydration synthesis” do?
Question 32
0.51 PointsQuestions for Further Study and Inquiry pg. 52:7.Food labels list the amounts of (and calories from) carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, but not nucleic acids. Why not?

paper should be roughly 4-5 pages (approximately) double-spaced. It is like a typical research paper in MLA format. One formatting component that is important is to be sure that you cite all your information properly in the body of the text. Since I assume that you are not an expert in any of these subject areas ALL the information you provide will come from the literature research you do and that means you need to cite the source in your text. This applies to ALL information, not just direct quotes. The research references used will factor into your grade for the paper, so take care in using multiple, scholarly sources (I suggest using at leastFOUR sources). Also, they cannot all be purely internet resources. What this means is the source cannot solely exist online. It has to be published in some form other than online (although you can ACCESS this resource online if that option exists). The more thorough your research and the more information and detail you can provide in your report, the more points you can earn. The paper must be your own work, in other words plagiarism is not tolerated
Paper topic choices:
1) What is the chemical composition of a “trans fat”? What makes trans fats unique or significant from a molecular perspective compared to other fats? Why have trans fats received so much attention in health news (what health conditions are they linked to)? Many are attempting to ban trans fats, but explain why this action might be counterproductive with respect to the fat CLA.
2) What is meant when plants photosynthetically “acclimate” to elevated CO2(be sure to address the effect on photosynthesis specifically)? Do all plants acclimate to elevated CO2? Petroleum industries have suggested that increases in carbon dioxide would be beneficial to plants since it is the carbon source for photosynthesis. Discuss the merits or weaknesses of this statement.
3) Describe in detail the genetic cause of cystic fibrosis, including details on the gene itself, how it is inherited, and the cellular processes that are affected. Explain the impact on the lungs and bronchi, followed by explaining how other tissues and organs are affected. It has been suggested that the genetic component of cystic fibrosis may be beneficial. What are some ideas as to why that might be the case?
4) Stem cell research holds tremendous promise for treating numerous diseases. What are stem cells? Are all stem cells the same? What are the clinical benefits and drawbacks of the various types of stem cells? (compare them to each other when describing the specific benefits and drawbacks for each) Identify a specific research project currently being performed on stem cells, and explain the goals and the results they obtained.
5) Many individuals suffer from lactose intolerance. What is lactose intolerance and why does it manifest the symptoms it does? What is the genetic/molecular cause behind lactose intolerance and behind tolerance in adults? Explain how this condition could be used as evidence to support ongoing human evolution. Provide other potential examples of modern human evolution.

Complete the assignment “Man vs Nature” as directed by your instructor.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

I have included most of the work, Just need help with the comments in the document and citations/referencing work. Most of the items aren’t mentioned in the Creative BioLabs document, you can research and input the data available online. If you can edit the word document in reviewing format then it help me with the tracking of the document.
Below is the guidelines for the paper
https://www.frontiersin.org/guidelines/author-guidelines

please use the following website:
https://htslabs.com/
Answer the following questions:
1. introduction about the company
2.list all the products and its uses (Use the link)
3. how the products are better than competitors
4. why choose “Thomson Solutions at Work” that other companies
“Please use lot of pictures and graphs to explain your content”

Use the Report Scoring Checklist and this paper template to be certain you have included all the required elements. Refer to this document Links to an external site.for guidelines on how to convert a step-by-step protocol to a narrative methods paragraph. Refer to this documentLinks to an external site. for guidelines on how to write a results paragraph.

Dear Writer,
This is a 1500-word research report that needs to be written. However, I am in a group of four students, so the task is split into four. Thus, you should write a maximum of 400 words for this task. I have chosen 3 Australian CIAs for this task. Pick any two of the three that you like and use it for this task. You must include 2 annotated references.
Assoc. Prof. Arun Azad (2022 row 105) –
Grant: Optimising radiopharmaceutical therapy to improve clinical outcomes in advanced prostate cancer: They will lead innovative clinical trials focusing on PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. By analyzing trial scans and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), they aim to understand why some patients respond better to these treatments, ultimately improving therapies for advanced prostate cancer.
Research articles:
Future directions in systemic treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36029329/) AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH ARTICLE MELBOURNE
——————————————————————————————
Dr Ruth Pidsley (2021 row 345) –
The grant title “Decoding the epigenome of the tumour microenvironment for improved patient outcomes in prostate cancer” is focused on studying molecular changes, specifically in the epigenome, within the environment surrounding a tumor. This research aims to better understand how these changes influence prostate cancer and to use that knowledge to improve patient outcomes.
Research Articles (PMC):
Enduring epigenetic landmarks define the cancer microenvironment. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29650553/)
——————————————————————————————————–
Assoc Prof Renea Taylor (2021 row 438) –
The grant title “Developing novel CAR T cell therapy approaches to treat prostate cancer” is related to molecular biology. CAR T cell therapy involves genetically modifying a patient’s T cells at the molecular level to enable them to better recognize and attack cancer cells. This research focuses on creating new methods to enhance this molecular-based treatment for prostate cancer.
Research Articles (PMC):
Alterations in the methylome of the stromal tumour microenvironment signal the presence and severity of prostate cancer (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32188493/)
FOXA2 rewires AP-1 for transcriptional reprogramming and lineage plasticity in prostate cancer
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38851846/)
________________________________________________________________________
The Task:
Each group is to complete a Research Report that clearly and concisely summarises the research topic from the computer classes that relate to a particular cancer, disease, or condition. The maximum length of the text narrative to be 1500 words. Figures legends, tables, in-text citations, references, and reference annotations do not count towards this word limit. NO COVER SHEET An assignment cover sheet is not required since the electronic submission of the assignment through Turnitin covers issues of authenticity and associated declarations previously stated on the Cover sheet. One mark will be deducted if is a coversheet is included. TITLE PAGE Include a Title Page with the following information Title: Not More than 140 Characters Including Spaces Authors: Group Member Names Affiliations: Home campus and institution name Abstract: The abstract should be one paragraph of 200-250 words. It should be written in a more general style than your main text that is comprehensible to a general reader. Include background content specific to your subject area, refer to each section of your essay and include a concluding sentence. Do not include any references in in the abstract. The Title page does not contribute to the overall word count. A Western coversheet is not required. MAIN TEXT The main text of your Research Report should be structured to include four (4) sections. Use an informative sub-heading for each of these. Use a single column for the entire document – do not use multiple columns. Be sure to refer to any Figures or Tables in the main text when your narrative covers information represented therein. Each section of the review must include peer reviewed sources. FIRST SECTION With a meaningful title (~200 words): From an Australia point of view, clearly state the rational of why the research area is considered to be priority. What benefit does the research return in relation to the prevalence or severity of the disease in Australia? Include factual data taken from peer reviewed literature. SECOND SECTION With a meaningful title (~400 words): Clearly describe the research outcomes for the CIA listed Australian scientists. Describe how these different scientists are researching the topic using different techniques and approaches. Refer to the figure that you have constructed, e.g. as shown in Figure 1. Also do not forget to include an appendix section at the end of your report that shows the images/sources used to make the figure. Don’t forget to include a descriptive figure legend that describes all aspects of your figure, the figure legend does not contribute to the overall word count. THIRD SECTION With a meaningful title (~400 words): PAGE 36 Describe, or compare or contrast any molecular/cellular pathways involved in the topic area. If pathways for the condition are not documented in the literature then describe the current understanding of the causes of the condition at the molecular level (referring to individual genes, proteins or genetic factors etc). This section describes all aspects of the disease and condition from any of the peerreviewed literature you have found (including those who are not based in Australia) FORTH SECTION With a meaningful title (~400 words): Describe any targeted medicine or potential treatments for the cancer, disease or condition, focus on medicine that were developed through rational drug design. Discuss the medicine in relation to the key molecular pathway or genetic factors you have described. Highlight in the prior Figure where these act in the pathway or elsewhere the cell. Do not discuss none-molecular treatments suce as surgical removal, radiotherapy or other generic treatments. Note. You are encouraged to discuss potential treatments described in the research papers, these do not need to be available in the clinic. TAG YOUR IN-TEXT CITATIONS Double check that the reference you have collected include at least the following for the Research Report. Refer to this as the 8+4+8+1+2 rule. Added these together to give the Research Report a minimum of 23 references in total. Use the Author Date format for intext citations and referencing based on Harvard style. For a guide to Harvard style follow this link: WSU Harvard style 8: [CIA] Include at least 2 Australian primary research articles for each group member with different authors who are CIAs in the NHMRC data. If there are 4 group members the report would contain papers from at least 8 different CIAs. 4: [REV] Include least 4 review articles related by keyword to these research articles. Each group member should contribute at least 1 review article. 8: [FOR] or [BAC] Include at least 8 research or review articles found by search forward or backward. 1: [BD] Include data from at least 1 referenced Biological Database. 2: [TM] Include at least 2 peer-reviewed articles that specifically report on Treatment or Medicine For the in-text citation of these references, include the above tags, make each tag coloured and bold to indicate the type of reference you are referring to. Example e.g. “It has been shown that foo is associated with the activity of bar (Smith 2022) [CIA] and this builds upon prior studies that show an increase in the severity of the disease in the absence of bar (Jones 2015) [BAC].” ANNOTATE YOUR REFERENCE LIST Include 8 annotations in your Reference List Include only one list of references. Within this single list annotate 4 of the [CIA] papers and 4 of the [FOR] or [BAC] articles. Use approximately 200 words for each annotation. These annotation are to inform the reader of the strengths of the papers or why you chose it in preference to another other paper you could have referenced, why was it better for you? Why was it relevant in your field of study. What is its relationships of the paper to other studies in the field?
1.1 Main Text First Section (400 words)
An excellent summary of both why funding was awarded in relation to the Priority Area’s and how benefit is returned from funding with respect to the disease.
Peer reviewed articles factual data – As many as you need to make the case.
50 words per person answering:
From an Australia point of view, clearly state the rational of why the research area is considered to be priority. What benefit does the research return in relation to the prevalence or severity of the disease in Australia? Include factual data taken from peer reviewed literature.
1.2 Main Text Second Section (400 words) – Everyone
An excellent summary of the impact of contributions made by Australian scientists towards understanding the disease.
Clearly describe the research outcomes for the CIA listed Australian scientists. Describe how these different scientists are researching the topic using different techniques and approaches. Refer to the figure that you have constructed, e.g. as shown in Figure 1. Also do not forget to include an appendix section at the end of your report that shows the images/sources used to make the figure. Don’t forget to include a descriptive figure legend that describes all aspects of your figure, the figure legend does not contribute to the overall word count.
2 CIA’s each person = 8 total
An excellent summary of the impact of contributions made by Australian scientists towards understanding the disease.
1 constructed diagram
Proteins for the diagram:
EDARADD
MYBL2
IDH1
1.3 Main Text Third Section: An excellent summary of the key molecular components involved taken from research data, wider literature and biological databases.
Talk about at least one in detail.
Describe, or compare or contrast any molecular/cellular pathways involved in the topic area. If pathways for the condition are not documented in the literature then describe the current understanding of the causes of the condition at the molecular level (referring to individual genes, proteins or genetic factors etc). This section describes all aspects of the disease and condition from any of the peerreviewed literature you have found (including those who are not based in Australia)
yAn excellent summary of the key molecular components involved taken from research data, wider literature and biological databases.
Main Text Fourth Section: An excellent summary of up to date specific medicines that are in development or used to treat the condition in Australia. Treatments relate to the described molecular components.
Reference List (Annotated)
————————————————————————————————————-
I provided the word limit for each section so divide that by 4. If you can create a nice diagram as well with figure legends and some figures/tables as well. Also a short 200 word abstract and a good title for our report. Figures legends, tables, in-text citations, references, and reference annotations do not count towards this word limit. PLEASE NOTE: As the word limit is short per person; you can include the rest of the information in the figure legends. For more information on what we have done as a group so far, please visit this google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16kYE_3SWgiXWpnvBl35wE6zxNGKiivcY1EEORJDryf4/edit?usp=sharing
I will use you again for the same task but an oral presentation. Thank you!

Explain how human population growth and human activities are major threats to the earth’s biodiversity.

Please answer the following questions:
Attached reference style for example
use Attached document to answer the following questions: answer under the following labeled questions:
Question 1:
Discuss how PML-RARA fusion contributes to leukemogenesis. What is the typical clinical and laboratory presentation? What therapy is critical to initiate with this fusion and why?
Question 2 :
How is MRD monitored in AML and what are some of the related issues?
Question 3 :
Discuss the role of the core binding factor in leukemogenesis. Discuss the molecular mechanisms of two translocations involving CBF in AML.
Question 4 :
Describe tests used in the diagnosis of AML. What are some of the practice guidelines for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of AML?
Question 5:
Describe some new treatments in AML that are in clinical development.
Question 6 :
Discuss some clinical issues in treating AML in older patients.
Question 7 :
What are leukemia stem cells and why are they so difficult to eradicate in AML?