Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approaches to advocacy. Does your method need to change based on the social problem or geographic region? With APA CITATION AND REFRANCES
1-tracy-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the selection is Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social workers are essential because they can support legislation changes and can help implement public policies to address Domestic violence (NASW, n/d). The social justice brief
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
The chosen selection increased awareness of the importance of social workers, complexities, a preventable severe public health problem, and the many forms of abuse. Usually, the perpetrators are in close relations (NASW, n/d). The brief brought back memories of my experiences and depicted great information, adding protective factors essential for families or individuals. As a person who knows all too well what the long-term effects are, I also see the importance of promoting resilience within yourself and the essentials for seeking treatment strategies, which is why I am in the field of study.
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
To advocate for change locally, one would need the essential education and knowledge of the populations they want to assist, whether from cultural diversity, children or adults, and what interventions and resources are available in their surrounding areas. Social workers have moral obligations to clients to advocate to assist with psychological stressors resulting from Intimate Partner Violence (Wilson & Webb, n/d). They can increase awareness with physicians and mental health professionals (Wilson & Webb, n/d). Individuals often hesitate to disclose any negative adverse issues at home or in the environment. Spreading the word so individuals know there are alternatives to escape their situations and the importance to promote prevention strategies and changes to policies. Also, the analysis depicts the need for additional policies and provisions in addition to strengths-based interventions and advocacy to spread the word locally or nationally by joining a local advocate group or national coalition group to promote increased funding and available shelters.
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). National Association of Social Workers, Code of Ethics. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Social justice briefsLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.. https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-BriefsLinks to an external site.
Wilson, M. H., & Webb, R. (n/d). Social Justice Brief, Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social Justice Brief. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
2-kenneth-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the Social Justice Brief I chose is Opiates in Our Backyard: Implications for Drug Policy. This social justice brief provides demographic data on the increases of heroin use by women and males of every population during 2002-2013 (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
I chose this social justice brief because the description of social work states, “The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty” (National Association of Social Workers, 2021) and this social justice brief details the severity for the needs of service as well as reveal dedicated teamwork and comprehensive-integrated care approaches have proven to be successful with transforming females suffering with a substance abuse disorder to living clean and sober lives, and becoming productive minded citizens (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
I would begin by referencing the positive example that a program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston has successfully engaged opiate using patients with support teams which consisted of addiction physicians, a psychiatrist, and a social worker (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). Utilizing a comprehensive-integrated care approach, patients are triaged to other community groups and helping agencies that can help reduce the cost of care while generating positive treatment outcomes for clients (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). My hook would be to describe that both men and women are experiencing higher levels of substance abuse on a yearly average, however, men have more readily accessible long-term drug treatment facilities in our area than women which is unfair and denying females who are wholeheartedly seeking treatment. I would also explain the importance of collaborating a professionally integrated public workforce that includes social workers to monitor a program for single homeless females suffering with substance use disorder is maintaining a high level of care for each client. Also, members of this population will not just be delivered from homeless, but lives are being saved from possible drug overdose and weather-related deaths as well.
References
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Wilson, M. H., & Dorn, C. (n.d.). Social Justice Briefs. Retrieved from National Association of Social Workers: https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-Briefs
Category: Biology homework help
APA format you are supposed to start developing a mini qualitative study on a t
APA format
you are supposed to start developing a mini qualitative study on a topic of your choice related to vegetarianism. You should follow the provided outline to guide your thoughts. Please do not provide information I did not ask for.
APA format quantitative research proposal on any issue of your choice. It can t
APA format
quantitative research proposal on any issue of your choice. It can to be on any public health topic (remember the interests you expressed in your introduction).
Do according to the guideline provided.
Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different process evaluation th
Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different process evaluation than you did. Respectfully agree or disagree with their analysis of the timing of the process evaluation and their proposal for adjustments. APA CITATION AND REFERANCES
1-IJEOMA-
Identify the process evaluation article that you chose and explain why you selected this example.
I chose the article “Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa” by Lachman et al. (2018). I selected this study because it offers a comprehensive and practical example of a process evaluation for an intervention to prevent child maltreatment by promoting positive parenting practices. The study is relevant due to its focus on a low-income context where families face numerous social challenges such as violence, poverty, and limited access to resources. The article also employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data, enriching the evaluation by providing diverse insights into program implementation and feasibility. Further, the study’s focus on local cultural contexts makes it a valuable example of how evidence-based interventions can be adapted for different populations.
Describe the purpose of the evaluation, the informants, the questions asked, and the results of the evaluation.
This process evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a parenting program to low-income families in South Africa, focusing on participant involvement, implementation fidelity, and program acceptability (Lachman et al., 2018). The evaluation aimed to determine whether the program was being delivered as intended, how participants received it, and whether adjustments were needed for future program iterations.
The informants for this evaluation were the parents participating in the program, primarily low-income, isiXhosa-speaking caregivers, and the community facilitators responsible for delivering the program (Lachman et al., 2018). The questions during the evaluation addressed vital aspects such as participant involvement, cultural relevance of the program content, barriers to engagement, and the facilitators’ ability to deliver the program effectively.
The evaluation results indicated high levels of participant involvement and engagement, with parents attending an average of 8.58 out of 12 sessions (Lachman et al., 2018). Program fidelity was strong, with facilitators implementing 92.9% of the manualized activities and high participant satisfaction scores (Lachman et al., 2018). However, the evaluation also revealed challenges, such as parents’ initial resistance to new parenting techniques and difficulties sustaining consistent attendance due to external factors like illness and political unrest.
Identify the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation was conducted.
The evaluation was conducted during the implementation phase of the program. Specifically, it occurred while the intervention was actively delivered to participants, allowing the researchers to assess how well the program was functioning in real-time.
Consider why the researchers chose to evaluate at that stage of program implementation. What kind of information would they have received if they had conducted the evaluation earlier or later?
The researchers likely chose to evaluate the program during the implementation stage to identify any immediate challenges or successes while the program was still in progress (Lachman et al., 2018). Evaluating at this stage provided an opportunity to monitor how well the facilitators adhered to the program model, how the participants were engaging, and what adjustments could be made to improve outcomes. This timing was critical because it allowed for ongoing modifications that could enhance the program’s effectiveness before scaling it further.
Had the researchers conducted the evaluation earlier, such as during the planning or early development stages, they would have missed the opportunity to observe real-time program delivery. They would have needed to capture the practical challenges of implementation. Conversely, after the program’s conclusion, conducting the evaluation later would have provided insights into long-term outcomes. However, it would have missed the chance to make real-time improvements that could enhance participant engagement and fidelity to the program model.
If you were to replicate the study, would you adjust it in any way for more optimal results?
If I were to replicate the study, I would include additional follow-up evaluations to assess the long-term sustainability of the program’s outcomes. While the initial process evaluation was thorough, a follow-up evaluation six months or one year after the program’s conclusion would provide valuable insights into whether parents continued using non-violent discipline techniques and other skills they learned. This would help determine the long-term effectiveness of the intervention and whether additional support or booster sessions are necessary to maintain the program’s positive effects. Additionally, I would consider integrating more rigorous strategies for mitigating external factors, such as illness or political unrest, that affected attendance, perhaps through virtual sessions or community support structures.
References
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018). Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665Links to an external site.
2-MARIA S-
I chose the article by Lachman et al. (2018) titled “Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa” due to its comprehensive approach to assessing the implementation of a critical intervention aimed at improving parenting practices in a vulnerable population. The article provides valuable insights into the nuances of process evaluation, particularly in how it informs program fidelity and effectiveness. Similarly, the study by Vil & Angel (2018) on a cross-age peer mentoring program offers another perspective on process evaluations, especially within programs targeting vulnerable populations.
Purpose of the Evaluation
The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the fidelity of a parenting program, understand the context of its implementation, and gather feedback from participants to improve the program’s delivery.
Informants
The informants included program facilitators, parents participating in the program, and community stakeholders. This diverse group provided multiple perspectives on the program’s implementation.
Questions Asked
The evaluation addressed several key questions:
How was the program delivered, and did it adhere to the planned curriculum?
What were the participants’ experiences and perceptions of the program?
What contextual factors influenced the implementation of the program?
Results of the Evaluation
The results indicated that while the program was generally implemented as intended, variations in delivery were noted based on facilitator styles and participant engagement. Participants reported positive changes in parenting practices and increased confidence. However, challenges such as logistical issues and varying levels of participant commitment were identified (Lachman et al., 2018).
Stage of Program Implementation
The evaluation was conducted during the implementation stage of the program. This stage is crucial as it allows for real-time feedback, enabling adjustments to be made to enhance effectiveness while the program is still running.
Rationale for Evaluation Stage
Researchers likely chose to evaluate at this stage to capture the immediate effects of the program and to identify any issues as they arose. Conducting the evaluation earlier could have provided insights into planning and design, while a later evaluation might have focused more on outcomes rather than implementation fidelity (Vil & Angel, 2018).
Replication Considerations
If I were to replicate the study, I would consider incorporating more quantitative measures alongside qualitative feedback to assess the program’s impact more systematically. Additionally, I would ensure a more structured follow-up process to track long-term changes in parenting practices among participants.
References
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018).
Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665Links to an external site.
Vil, C. S., & Angel, A. (2018). A study of a cross-age peer mentoring program on educationally disconnected young adults. Social Work, 63(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy033
Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approac
Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approaches to advocacy. Does your method need to change based on the social problem or geographic region? With APA CITATION AND REFRANCES
1-tracy-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the selection is Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social workers are essential because they can support legislation changes and can help implement public policies to address Domestic violence (NASW, n/d). The social justice brief
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
The chosen selection increased awareness of the importance of social workers, complexities, a preventable severe public health problem, and the many forms of abuse. Usually, the perpetrators are in close relations (NASW, n/d). The brief brought back memories of my experiences and depicted great information, adding protective factors essential for families or individuals. As a person who knows all too well what the long-term effects are, I also see the importance of promoting resilience within yourself and the essentials for seeking treatment strategies, which is why I am in the field of study.
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
To advocate for change locally, one would need the essential education and knowledge of the populations they want to assist, whether from cultural diversity, children or adults, and what interventions and resources are available in their surrounding areas. Social workers have moral obligations to clients to advocate to assist with psychological stressors resulting from Intimate Partner Violence (Wilson & Webb, n/d). They can increase awareness with physicians and mental health professionals (Wilson & Webb, n/d). Individuals often hesitate to disclose any negative adverse issues at home or in the environment. Spreading the word so individuals know there are alternatives to escape their situations and the importance to promote prevention strategies and changes to policies. Also, the analysis depicts the need for additional policies and provisions in addition to strengths-based interventions and advocacy to spread the word locally or nationally by joining a local advocate group or national coalition group to promote increased funding and available shelters.
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). National Association of Social Workers, Code of Ethics. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Social justice briefsLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.. https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-BriefsLinks to an external site.
Wilson, M. H., & Webb, R. (n/d). Social Justice Brief, Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social Justice Brief. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
2-kenneth-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the Social Justice Brief I chose is Opiates in Our Backyard: Implications for Drug Policy. This social justice brief provides demographic data on the increases of heroin use by women and males of every population during 2002-2013 (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
I chose this social justice brief because the description of social work states, “The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty” (National Association of Social Workers, 2021) and this social justice brief details the severity for the needs of service as well as reveal dedicated teamwork and comprehensive-integrated care approaches have proven to be successful with transforming females suffering with a substance abuse disorder to living clean and sober lives, and becoming productive minded citizens (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
I would begin by referencing the positive example that a program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston has successfully engaged opiate using patients with support teams which consisted of addiction physicians, a psychiatrist, and a social worker (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). Utilizing a comprehensive-integrated care approach, patients are triaged to other community groups and helping agencies that can help reduce the cost of care while generating positive treatment outcomes for clients (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). My hook would be to describe that both men and women are experiencing higher levels of substance abuse on a yearly average, however, men have more readily accessible long-term drug treatment facilities in our area than women which is unfair and denying females who are wholeheartedly seeking treatment. I would also explain the importance of collaborating a professionally integrated public workforce that includes social workers to monitor a program for single homeless females suffering with substance use disorder is maintaining a high level of care for each client. Also, members of this population will not just be delivered from homeless, but lives are being saved from possible drug overdose and weather-related deaths as well.
References
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Wilson, M. H., & Dorn, C. (n.d.). Social Justice Briefs. Retrieved from National Association of Social Workers: https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-Briefs
I have a PDF file for analysis, 7-8 sentences needed in a form of a memo (link
I have a PDF file for analysis, 7-8 sentences needed in a form of a memo (link below), so around 250 words in total should be the maximum word count, I’m fine with less.
Format: The memo should be in the format of a short letter to your boss, the Head of Drug Discovery. You may be creative with the names of people and companies if you wish. If you are unsure of the correct formatting for a memo, check out these templates.
Length: The Memo should be approximately two paragraphs in length. Do not exceed 400 words. Managers don’t like to read lengthy articles. Keep everything very clear and brief.
Content: The Head of Drug Discovery does not remember all of the details about how enzymes work. The Memo needs to:
Define enzymes.
Explain how enzymes function as catalysts for biochemical reactions.
Discuss how reactions can be inhibited by inhibiting enzymes. (Note: enzymes themselves do NOT inhibit chemical reactions. Another inhibitory ligand binds to the enzyme, preventing it from catalyzing the reaction.)
Explain the importance of drugs that could be developed to interfere with the structure of telomerase to treat cancer.
https://create.microsoft.com/en-us/templates/memo
this website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: ht
this website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/03/title-case-and-sentence-case-capitalization-in-apa-style.html
Submit a 3-page plan for a process evaluation based on the new program that you proposed earlier in the course.
Provide a summary of the program and the needs of the target population. (SUBSTANCE ABUSE IN ADOLENCENT)
Explain why a process evaluation would be important for the program.
State the type of process evaluation and stage of implementation (when in the program it will occur) and why.
Determine who will conduct the process evaluation (internal or external evaluator).
Include a broad question to be answered by the process evaluation (overarching question).
Identify specific questions to be answered by the process evaluation (subquestions).
Describe a plan for gathering and analyzing the information.
Describe a plan for ongoing evaluations (how often, etc.).
Use the Learning Resources and peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles to support your paper. Make sure to include appropriate APA citations and a reference list.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Types of evaluationLinks to an external site.. https://www.cdc.gov/std/program/pupestd/types%20of%20evaluation.pdf
TSNE. (2018, June 14). Process evaluation vs. outcome evaluationLinks to an external site.. https://www.tsne.org/blog/process-evaluation-vs-outcome-evaluation
Process Evaluation Studies
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018). Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South AfricaLinks to an external site.. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665
Vil, C. S., & Angel, A. (2018). A study of a cross-age peer mentoring program on educationally disconnected young adultsLinks to an external site.. Social Work, 63(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy033
his website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: htt
his website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/03/title-case-and-sentence-case-capitalization-in-apa-style.html
Identify the process evaluation article that you chose and explain why you selected this example.
Describe the purpose of the evaluation, the informants, the questions asked, and the results of the evaluation.
Identify the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation was conducted.
Consider why the researchers chose to evaluate at that stage of program implementation. What kind of information would they have received if they had conducted the evaluation earlier or later?
If you were to replicate the study, would you adjust it in any way for more optimal results?
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Types of evaluationLinks to an external site.. https://www.cdc.gov/std/program/pupestd/types%20of%20evaluation.pdf
TSNE. (2018, June 14). Process evaluation vs. outcome evaluationLinks to an external site.. https://www.tsne.org/blog/process-evaluation-vs-outcome-evaluation
Process Evaluation Studies
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018). Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South AfricaLinks to an external site.. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665
Vil, C. S., & Angel, A. (2018). A study of a cross-age peer mentoring program on educationally disconnected young adultsLinks to an external site.. Social Work, 63(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy033
This website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: h
This website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/03/title-case-and-sentence-case-capitalization-in-apa-style.html
Locate the information for Florida representative(s) responsible for the policy and/or policy alternative you selected earlier in the course.
Review the advocacy resources from the Council on Social Work Education and the American Psychological Association from the Learning Resources this week.
Review the letter and email examples from the Sample Letters and Emails section of the Learning Resources this week.
Determine whether you will write a letter or an email to your representative(s). (Consider the tips from your resources this week to make your decision.)
Craft your message and send it to your local or state representative(s).
Complete the two-part Assignment.
Part 1:
Submit a 1page message to your political representative(s). Address the following in your message:
Use the appropriate structure for the delivery format (letter or email).
Introduce yourself and your intent or request.
Describe the social problem and impacts of the policy in question.
Use facts, stories, or other details to appeal to the representative(s) and connect the policy work to their district or state.
Provide a call to action—inspire your representative(s) to rise to this occasion.
Part 2:
Submit a 1-page reflection of your process for writing a message to your political representative(s). Address the following in your short reflection:
Describe the experience of sending the message—either via letter or email—to your representative(s). How did it feel to formally advocate on behalf of a policy to alleviate a social problem you have thoroughly reviewed?
Did you write a letter or an email? Explain your reasoning.
Describe how you constructed the letter. Use the Council on Social Work Education and American Psychological Association resources from the Learning Resources this week to support your choices.
Explain how you used your advocacy skills in your communication.
What are your next steps as an advocate?
American Public Health Association. (2021). APHA letter to the House Education and Labor Committee in support of H.R. 1195, the Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Services Workers ActLinks to an external site.. https://www.apha.org/-/media/Files/PDF/advocacy/letters/2021/210323_HR1195_workplace_violence.ashx
American Psychological Association. (2017). Effective advocacy: Links to an external site.Sample emailLinks to an external site.. https://www.apa.org/advocacy/guide/sample-email.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2017). Effective advocacy: Links to an external site.Sample letterLinks to an external site.. https://www.apa.org/advocacy/guide/sample-letters.pd
This website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: htt
This website (remains applicable from APA 6th to 7th) may also be helpful: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/03/title-case-and-sentence-case-capitalization-in-apa-style.html
Post to your Discussion, addressing the following:
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Social justice briefsLinks to an external site.. https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-Briefs
Council on Social Work Education. (n.d.). Advocacy & policyLinks to an external site.. https://www.cswe.org/advocacy-policy/
Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC. (2017). Advocacy handbook: A resource guide for social workersLinks to an external site.. Council on Social Work Education. https://www.cswe.org/Advocacy-Policy/CSWEAdvocacyHandbook_Oct2017
American Psychological Association. (2017). How to write a letter or email: Stand out among the hundreds of letters and emails that flood the mailboxes of congresspeople each dayLinks to an external site.. https://www.apa.org/advocacy/guide/letter-email