Category: Aviation

The student will research and select one current (written five years ago or less), peer-reviewed,
scholarly research article on the topic chosen for the final research paper. The student will write
a 2-3-page (not including the title page, abstract, nor the reference page) analysis of the article
and include the following elements:
1. Describe the purpose of this research article.
2. Why did you choose this research article for your final paper?
3. How will this research be used as a support in your final paper?
4. Include what data analysis methods the researcher used.
5. Offer a critique of the research content.
6. Include a biblical worldview. What biblical applications can one gain from the purpose of
the research?
This Article Review should be a source that can be used in your Research Paper.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

This assignment aims to demonstrate the application of the primary flight display and the multi-
function display of the Garmin G1000 by combining the components of the Garmin G1000’s
display in practical applications.
Task: Familiarize yourself with the user manuals (Integrated Flight Deck Pilot’s Guide and the
Integrated Flight Deck Cockpit Reference Guide) of the Garmin G1000. For this task, you will
create a study guide, including screenshots or diagrams of each component of the primary flight
display and the multi-function display and each component is labeled for easy recognition. You
must include, state, and describe each part’s practical usage and functionality. The expectation is
that when you are done, your study guide is so thorough that your peer could study it and ace an
exam.
A great example of a practical and thorough study guide is seen in the watch idea of Module 1
titled “Garmin G1000 Introduction.” Be sure to watch this video before getting started. This is an
open-ended project. You can create a digital study guide using Mural or you can create an
infographic utilizing Canva. You could even make a study guide using Microsoft or an Adobe
product. You could even make a study guide utilizing a combination of PowerPoint and a
correlating video using Loom (very similar to the watch item in Module 1). There are links for
these websites in the G1000 Study Guide Creation Project Resources section in the assignment
descriiption. Again, this is an open-ended project.

After reviewing the above resources, describe the following concerning flight and ground operations:
The FAA rulemaking process for developing regulations
How ICAO develops standards and recommended practices (SARPs)
The differences between an FAA regulation and a SARP
Links to use:
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking
https://www.icao.int/about-icao/AirNavigationCommission/Pages/how-icao-develops-standards.aspx

You work for a large aviation company in the design section. In a high-level meeting today, your bosses have gathered all the design engineers together to discuss the fact that our aviation partners have reported an alarming increase in cockpit errors, flight crew mistakes, and other human performance problems in every aspect of industry operations in the past year. Customers are frustrated, management is unhappy, and this is trickling back to you, the design engineers, to see if you can offer some solutions for improvement based on your knowledge of the industry, design, ergonomics, and human factors.
Select a design problem, and describe how ergonomics and/or human factors in design, technology, or automation may help to mitigate/reduce/remedy this problem. Provide data from a scholarly source or related case to back up this proposal. Finally, explain how you will implement this proposal, track the success measures, and include a feedback loop and timeline.
While APA format is not required for the paper itself, ensure that any references are properly cited in current APA format.
Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity.

please respond to the following questions in 125 word or more each:
What if Crew Resource Management (CRM) had been instituted before the tragedy of Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571? How could CRM have mitigated the human errors that played a role in this devastating event?
Describe the benefits of CRM in reducing human error across various industries. describe How these regulatory frameworks influence the implementation and evolution of CRM in different regions provide valuable insights on understanding the broader context.

I have added a word doc with the asignemnt requirements. The Company to write about is American Airlines.

Title or Cover Page – Include title, activity number, course number, and your name at a minimum.
Introduction or executive summary – include a brief paragraph to introduce your reader to your approach to this analysis and what to expect.
Primary Causal Factor(s) of the Accident – Include one to two paragraphs identifying the probable cause(s) of the accident. Usually, it is hard to narrow an accident event down to a single cause, especially if two related or intertwined systems or system components are involved simultaneously, referred to as ‘coupling’ in the context of safety analysis. This content must be evidence-based and factual in nature.
Contributing Factors to the Accident – Include two to four paragraphs identifying what the contributing factors were causal to the accident. These factors contributed to the accident, even though they weren’t primary. These factors could be links in the ‘accident chain’ of events leading up to the mishap. These factors may reduce or exacerbate the accident conditions and resulting severity. A thorough analysis in this section should aid you in formulating potential risk mitigation or reduction strategies in a subsequent section. This content must be evidence-based and factual in nature.
Structural and Mechanical Factors Related to the Accident – Include two to four paragraphs identifying the structural and mechanical factors involved in this accident. This portion should entail the bulk of your analysis. Use this section to detail any strengths and weaknesses of the applicable aviation system(s), whether aircraft design, construction, maintenance, component reliability, etc. This content must be evidence-based and factual in nature.
Relevant Human Factors and/or Organizational Factors Related to the Accident – Include two to four paragraphs identifying what the relevant human/organizational factors were involved in this accident. Be sure to include how these deficiencies led to or exacerbated the situation. This content must be evidence-based and factual in nature.
Outcomes of the Accident – Include two to four paragraphs stating what happened subsequent to the accident (this may be months or years later). Although a bulleted list of outcome items may be provided, there should be sufficient explanations to describe any disparities between the investigation board’s proposed solutions (i.e., recommendations) versus ‘real-world’ eventual actions by the various governmental and industry groups. Examples may include possible airworthiness directives (ADs) issued, new regulations or rules adopted or amended, redesign standards, etc. Consider which recommendations were suggested by the investigation board. Were these recommendations followed or complied with? What recommendations were left unheeded? If so, why? This content must be evidence-based and factual in nature.
Risk Mitigation or Reduction Strategies – Include two to four paragraphs explaining, from your analysis, any risk mitigation or reduction strategies or methods that you believe may have either prevented this accident or lessened its severity. This is your opportunity to demonstrate and integrate your knowledge learned up to this point of the course and apply learned facets in analyzing this accident. This is where you can interject your opinions, suggestions, any differences you may have regarding investigation board results, and any differences toward eventual outcomes related to this accident. This section should prepare you for your Discussion – Case Study Reflection
Conclusion or Summary – Include one or two paragraphs to explain your main take-aways from this case study. This is your opportunity to demonstrate and integrate your knowledge learned up to this point of the course and apply learned facets in analyzing this accident. This is also where you can interject your opinions, suggestions, or differences regarding investigation board results related to this accident. This section should prepare you for your Discussion – Case Study Reflection
Reference Page – Include all references cited in the paper of information sources, in current APA edition format.

paper should include the following:
Brief summary of what happened
Analysis of the accident looking at:
Professionalism
Decision making
Operational Risk Management
Communication
Conclusion/Recommendations for how this type of accident could be prevented in the future
Criteria:
Length: 2-4 pages, double-spaced (Does not include cover page and reference page).
1” margins, 12-point Arial font
APA format for sources
Use a cover page with name, course code & subject, and school.
“Stadler Adwell, ASC2870, Safety Management Systems & Operational Risk Management, Polk State College”

I have uploaded lecture notes, please check them out they might be useful. I numbered them from the oldest to newest. Also, sample plots for each question check this file. The plots should be the same as plots in the file. this file is very important.
This assignment requires Matlab
Make them clear and organized

I have uploaded lecture notes, please check them out they might be useful. I numbered them from the oldest to newest. Also, sample plots for each question check this file. The plots should be the same as plots in the file. this file is very important.
This assignment requires Matlab
Make them clear and organized