Category: Applied Sciences homework help

3.⁠ ⁠What is your recommendation – should Green Zebra expand to Seattle (3 or more new stores) or Portland

To make a well-informed recommendation on whether Green Zebra should expand to Seattle (with 3 or more new stores) or Portland, it’s essential to consider several factors, including market demand, competition, logistics, customer demographics, and the broader economic environment in each city. Below is a breakdown of key considerations for each location to help guide the decision:

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

1. Market Demand and Consumer Behavior

• Seattle:
  • Pros: Seattle has a rapidly growing population and a well-established demand for healthy, organic, and sustainable food options. With a significant focus on tech industry professionals (e.g., Amazon, Microsoft employees), Seattle consumers tend to value health-conscious products and are willing to spend on high-quality, organic foods. Additionally, Seattle’s increasing interest in sustainability aligns well with Green Zebra’s mission of providing healthy and local food options.
  • Cons: Seattle’s market is already saturated with various organic grocery stores, including well-established players like Whole Foods, PCC Community Markets, and even new health-focused chains like Thrive Market. This could mean higher competition and the need for significant differentiation.
• Portland:
  • Pros: Portland has a strong culture of sustainability and health-conscious eating. The city is well-known for its commitment to organic and local foods, and the market for natural foods is strong here. Consumers are typically willing to pay a premium for organic, locally sourced products. The city’s smaller population (compared to Seattle) might allow for faster market penetration and less saturation, giving Green Zebra an edge.
  • Cons: While Portland is an attractive market for health-focused retailers, it also has its fair share of competition, especially from local co-ops and smaller organic markets. However, the market may not be as competitive as Seattle’s larger metropolitan area.

2. Competition and Differentiation

• Seattle: As mentioned, Seattle is home to major players in the organic food market. While this means strong demand, it also means that Green Zebra would have to work hard to differentiate itself from established competitors, which could involve a unique pricing strategy, superior customer service, or a distinctive store experience.

• Portland: Portland’s market might be slightly less competitive in terms of large-scale organic grocery chains, giving Green Zebra an opportunity to capture a niche market more easily. However, there is a risk of facing competition from strong local food culture and independent retailers, which are key players in the Portland market.

3. Cost of Expansion and Logistics

• Seattle: Expanding to Seattle will likely come with higher startup costs due to the higher cost of real estate and potential challenges in acquiring prime locations in the city’s most desirable neighborhoods. The cost of labor and operations may also be higher. However, Seattle’s larger population base could help offset these higher costs by offering a broader customer base.

• Portland: Portland may offer lower real estate and operational costs, and while its population is smaller than Seattle’s, it still has a solid customer base for organic groceries. Additionally, Portland’s local food scene means the city might be more supportive of a newcomer offering healthy, local, and sustainable options.

4. Economic and Demographic Trends

• Seattle: Seattle has a high concentration of higher-income earners, tech professionals, and a younger population (Millennials and Gen Z), which is a great target market for Green Zebra’s product offering. The overall economic environment is robust, driven by the tech sector, which leads to a higher demand for premium grocery options.

• Portland: Portland also has a young, environmentally conscious population, but it’s smaller than Seattle’s. The city’s economic environment is steadily growing, driven by its arts, tech, and sustainability sectors. Portland’s culture of valuing sustainability might translate into higher loyalty for Green Zebra’s product offerings.

5. Brand and Cultural Fit

• Seattle: Seattle’s tech-savvy and health-conscious consumer base would likely appreciate Green Zebra’s focus on organic and sustainable products. However, the brand may need to position itself carefully to stand out from well-established local and national chains.

• Portland: Portland’s culture is incredibly aligned with Green Zebra’s mission of sustainability and organic foods. Green Zebra could integrate seamlessly into the community, potentially creating a strong brand presence with local engagement, organic partnerships, and community-based marketing.

Recommendation: Expand to Portland

Given these factors, my recommendation would be for Green Zebra to expand to Portland rather than Seattle. While Seattle offers a larger potential customer base, the competition in the organic grocery space is much more intense, and the operational costs are higher. Portland’s relatively smaller market size may provide a more manageable entry point with lower competition from large chains. Moreover, Portland’s strong alignment with Green Zebra’s brand values—sustainability, local sourcing, and health-conscious living—would make it an ideal market to grow and develop a loyal customer base.

Portland offers a prime opportunity to establish a strong foothold with lower risk and a more focused marketing strategy. Green Zebra can build a reputation as a community-oriented, sustainable brand in Portland, which could serve as a springboard to expand into other similar cities in the future.

Key Considerations for Expansion to Portland:

• Leverage local food trends and partnerships with local producers to strengthen brand loyalty.
• Create a customer-centric store experience that resonates with Portland’s values.
• Emphasize sustainable and ethical sourcing to appeal to Portland’s environmentally-conscious market.
• Use targeted marketing to build awareness of Green Zebra’s unique value proposition in a market filled with independent stores.

In summary, Portland represents a less saturated market, with a strong cultural fit, lower operational costs, and a more manageable competitive landscape, making it the ideal location for Green Zebra’s next expansion.

Walk Ons Sports Bistreaux offers a unique dining experience with flavorful dishes like Boom Boom Shrimp, Jalapeño Jack Burgers, and Louisiana classics such as Crawfish Étoufée. Their menu includes gluten-free, vegetarian, and dessert options. Check out the full menu with photos and prices at https://walkandfeast.com/.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Overview of Walk-On’s Sports Bistreaux

Walk-On’s Sports Bistreaux offers a dynamic and enjoyable dining experience with a wide variety of flavorful dishes. The restaurant is known for its signature items, including the Boom Boom Shrimp, Jalapeño Jack Burgers, and traditional Louisiana dishes such as Crawfish Étoufée. The menu is designed to appeal to a broad range of tastes, offering options like gluten-free and vegetarian meals.

Menu Highlights

1. Boom Boom Shrimp – A fan favorite that showcases crispy shrimp tossed in a tangy and flavorful sauce.
2. Jalapeño Jack Burger – A bold burger option featuring spicy jalapeños and melted jack cheese.
3. Crawfish Étoufée – A Louisiana classic made with crawfish smothered in a savory roux-based sauce, served over rice.

Special Dietary Options

• Gluten-Free Options – Walk-On’s offers several dishes catering to those who need gluten-free choices.
• Vegetarian Options – The menu also includes vegetarian meals, ensuring that diners with dietary restrictions have plenty of options.
• Dessert Options – The restaurant provides dessert selections to satisfy your sweet tooth.

For more details, including prices and photos of each item, visit the full menu at Walk-On’s Sports Bistreaux.

Provide a one paragraph summary that discusses what you believe to be the best way to approach strategic planning: should organizations plan 3, 5 or 10 years ahead and why?

Strategic Planning: The Ideal Timeframe

The best approach to strategic planning depends on the organization’s industry, market conditions, and adaptability. A five-year plan is often the most effective because it balances long-term vision with the flexibility to adjust to changing circumstances. Three-year plans may be too short for substantial growth, while ten-year plans risk becoming outdated due to rapid technological and economic changes. A five-year strategy allows organizations to set ambitious yet realistic goals, measure progress, and pivot as needed, ensuring sustained success in an evolving marketplace.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Your Paper on Strategic Planning

1. Understand the Assignment Requirements
   • Carefully read the prompt to determine key elements such as the required length, format, and any specific focus areas.
   • Identify whether the assignment requires analysis, argumentation, or comparison.
2. Develop a Clear Thesis Statement
   • Your thesis should state whether organizations should plan for 3, 5, or 10 years and justify your choice.
   • Example: “A five-year strategic plan is the most effective because it balances long-term goals with the flexibility to adapt to industry changes.”
3. Conduct Research and Gather Evidence
   • Use reputable sources such as academic journals, business case studies, and expert opinions to support your argument.
   • Cite at least 3-4 sources in APA format to strengthen credibility.
4. Outline Your Paper
   • Introduction: Briefly introduce strategic planning and state your thesis.
   • Body Paragraphs:
     • Discuss the pros and cons of different planning timeframes (3, 5, and 10 years).
     • Provide real-world examples of companies that succeeded or failed with specific planning strategies.
     • Justify your recommended timeframe with logical reasoning and supporting evidence.
   • Conclusion: Summarize key points and reinforce why your chosen timeframe is the best approach.
5. Write and Edit Your Paper
   • Draft your paper, ensuring each paragraph supports your thesis.
   • Review for clarity, coherence, and proper grammar.
   • Format citations and references in APA Style as required.
6. Proofread and Finalize
   • Use spell-check and grammar tools to catch errors.
   • Read your paper aloud to ensure smooth flow.
   • Submit your final draft before the deadline.

By following this structured approach, you will create a well-researched and persuasive paper that effectively argues the ideal strategic planning timeframe for organizations.

For your final project for this course, you will fill the role as a newly hired quality executive at a midsized health system. The health system has developed a bad reputation for a lack of quality in care provided to patients. The board of directors is looking to you to lead efforts in the organization becoming an Accountable Care Organization (ACO).
This final project will be a culmination of all the prior assignments. For the final project you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation that will be presented at the organization’s town hall, where you will present to all stakeholders (community leaders, clinical providers, and other organizational staff). The presentation will be your communication strategy to promote the strategic planning process to all of the stakeholders.
The PowerPoint will include the following sections, which can consist of as many slides as needed to present the information:
Title slide
Marketing planning process explanation
Outline of the Accountable Care Organization
Marketing image of new Accountable Care Organization
Mission and Vision
Results of the SWOT analysis
Strategic Analysis – Why are you/the organization creating the ACO? (Remember, community leaders will be present; what is in it for them?)
Timeline of plan
Measure of success. (Once the ACO is created, how will you measure for success?)
References
Your presentation must be a minimum of 12 slides, not counting the title and references slides. You may add additional slides if you feel they will add value to the presentation. The title and references slides do not count toward the minimum of 12 slides. Full sentences should not be used on the PowerPoint slide, but rather speaking-point bullets. Each slide should have at least 100 words of speaker notes in the notes section. A minimum of four sources will be used to support the information in your PowerPoint presentation. Your presentation, to include all references, will be formatted in APA Style.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

As a newly appointed quality executive at a midsized health system, your task is to develop a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation to communicate the organization’s transition to an Accountable Care Organization (ACO) to various stakeholders. Here’s a structured, step-by-step guide to help you craft an effective presentation:

1. Title Slide

• Content: Include the presentation title, your name, your position, and the date.
• Speaker Notes: Briefly introduce yourself and state the purpose of the presentation.

2. Marketing Planning Process Explanation

• Content: Outline the steps involved in the marketing planning process tailored to the health system’s transition to an ACO.
• Speaker Notes: Explain each step in detail, emphasizing how it aligns with the organization’s goals.

3. Outline of the Accountable Care Organization

• Content: Provide a concise overview of what an ACO is and its significance in healthcare.
• Speaker Notes: Discuss the core principles of ACOs and how they aim to improve patient care and reduce costs.

4. Marketing Image of New Accountable Care Organization

• Content: Design a visual representation (e.g., logo or tagline) that embodies the new ACO’s identity.
• Speaker Notes: Describe the elements of the design and their relevance to the organization’s mission and vision.

5. Mission and Vision

• Content: Clearly state the mission and vision statements of the new ACO.
• Speaker Notes: Elaborate on how these statements reflect the organization’s commitment to quality care and accountability.

6. Results of the SWOT Analysis

• Content: Present a summarized SWOT analysis highlighting the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
• Speaker Notes: Provide insights into each component and discuss strategies to leverage strengths and opportunities while addressing weaknesses and threats.

7. Strategic Analysis – Rationale for Creating the ACO

• Content: Explain the strategic reasons behind the organization’s decision to become an ACO.
• Speaker Notes: Highlight the benefits for various stakeholders, including community leaders, clinical providers, and staff, emphasizing what’s in it for them.

8. Timeline of Plan

• Content: Develop a detailed timeline outlining the key milestones in the implementation of the ACO.
• Speaker Notes: Discuss each phase, its objectives, and the expected outcomes.

9. Measure of Success

• Content: Define the metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to assess the success of the ACO.
• Speaker Notes: Explain how these measures align with the organization’s goals and the methods for data collection and analysis.

10. References

• Content: List all sources used in the presentation, formatted in APA Style.
• Speaker Notes: Mention the importance of evidence-based information and proper citation to maintain credibility.

Additional Tips:

• Slide Design: Ensure slides are visually appealing with consistent fonts, colors, and layouts. Use graphics and charts where appropriate to enhance understanding.
• Speaker Notes: Each slide should have at least 100 words in the speaker notes section to guide your presentation. These notes should expand on the bullet points, providing a script or detailed talking points.
• APA Formatting: Adhere to APA Style for citations and references. This includes in-text citations on slides (if applicable) and a comprehensive reference list.
• Sources: Utilize a minimum of four credible sources to support your content. These can include academic journals, reputable websites, and authoritative texts.

By following this structured approach, you’ll be well-prepared to deliver a compelling presentation that effectively communicates the strategic planning process for the organization’s transition to an Accountable Care Organization.

Identify the target behavior and begin to develop your rationale for selecting it. What was the assessment process followed? What was the function of the problem behavior?

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Identify the Target Behavior

• Begin by clearly defining the specific behavior you are analyzing.
• Describe the behavior in objective and measurable terms (e.g., “frequent verbal outbursts in class” instead of “acting out”).
• Explain why this behavior is significant—how it impacts the individual and others in their environment.

Step 2: Develop Your Rationale for Selecting This Behavior

• Justify why you chose this particular behavior.
• Consider its frequency, intensity, and the consequences it has on the individual’s academic, social, or daily functioning.
• Mention any ethical considerations or specific concerns that make this behavior a priority for intervention.

Step 3: Outline the Assessment Process

• Detail the methods used to assess the behavior (e.g., direct observation, interviews, ABC data collection).
• Explain how data was gathered and analyzed to understand patterns in the behavior.
• Provide examples of how environmental, social, or emotional factors were considered in the assessment.

Step 4: Determine the Function of the Problem Behavior

• Use the collected data to determine the function of the behavior (e.g., seeking attention, escaping a task, accessing a tangible reward, or self-stimulation).
• Support your explanation with evidence from your assessment.
• Discuss how identifying the function helps in developing effective intervention strategies.

Step 5: Structure Your Paper Effectively

1. Introduction – Introduce the behavior, its significance, and an overview of what your paper will cover.
2. Target Behavior Identification – Clearly define and describe the behavior.
3. Rationale for Selection – Justify why this behavior was chosen for analysis.
4. Assessment Process – Explain the steps taken to assess the behavior.
5. Function of Behavior – Discuss the identified function based on assessment findings.
6. Conclusion – Summarize key points and highlight the importance of understanding behavior functions for effective intervention.

Step 6: Review and Edit Your Paper

• Check for clarity, coherence, and logical flow.
• Ensure all claims are supported with evidence.
• Proofread for grammar, spelling, and formatting consistency.

Welcome to Week # 6. This week’s assignment, Please see below:
Assignment Instructions:
You will be submitting your Recommendations and Conclusion section of your paper. The Recommendations and Conclusions section should in the Recommendations section cover things such as how to address the issue you wrote about, identifying gaps in the subject area, deliver suggestions, etc. The Conclusion section should cover should explain why your research is important, help the reader to reflect back on what they read, and leave the reader wanting more.
Recommendations Info: https://edubirdie.com/blog/how-to-write-recommendations-in-research-paper
Conclusion Info: https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Conclusion%20Section%20for%20Research%20Papers.pdf
REQUIREMENTS:
6 – 8 Pages in length in APA format
Reference Section
NOTE: The sections at the end of the course will be:
Cover Page
Table of Contents
Foreword
Abstract
Introduction
Literature Review
Discussion
Recommendations and Conclusions
References
MISCELLANEOUS:
Use current and real world data to make your points, not just the textbook
Your references should not be more than 5 years old
Your assignment is due by Sunday not later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern time.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
CO-1: Examine the various aspects of cybersecurity including the relationship between cyber defense, cyber operations, cyber exploitations, cyber intelligence, cybercrime, Cyberlaw within Federal and State Laws
CO-2: Deconstruct the processes and goals of cyber forensics investigations including the importance of search warrants and chain of custody in a forensic investigation of computer related crimes
CO-3: Prepare a plan to manage functions that encompass overseeing a program or technical aspect of a security program at a high level ensuring currency with changing risk and threat environments.
CO-4: Prepare a plan to design functions that encompass scoping a program or developing procedures, processes, and architectures that guide work execution at the program and/or system level.
CO-5: Develop strategies and plans for security architecture consisting of tools, techniques, and technologies to detect and prevent network penetration, and to design effective cybersecurity countermeasures.
CO-6: Develop a policy to analyze network designs, topologies, architectures, protocols, communications, administration, operations, and resource management for wired, wireless, and satellite networks that affect the security of the cyberspace.
CO-7: Develop a policy to implement functions that encompass putting programs, processes, or policies into action within an organization.
CO-8: Prepare a plan to evaluate functions that encompass assessing the effectiveness of a program, policy, process, or security service in achieving its objectives.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide to Writing the Recommendations and Conclusion Section

Step 1: Understand the Purpose of Each Section

• Recommendations Section: Provide practical suggestions on how to address the issue discussed in your paper. This includes identifying gaps in the subject area and offering actionable solutions.
• Conclusion Section: Summarize the key takeaways from your research, explain its significance, and leave a lasting impression on the reader.

Step 2: Writing the Recommendations Section

1. Revisit Your Findings
   • Review the discussion section of your paper and extract key insights.
   • Identify any gaps in knowledge, limitations, or unresolved issues.
2. Provide Actionable Recommendations
   • Suggest practical steps to address the issue.
   • Ensure recommendations are specific, realistic, and supported by research.
   • Use real-world data to validate your suggestions.
3. Structure Your Recommendations Clearly
   • Prioritized List: Organize your recommendations from most to least important.
   • Supporting Evidence: Back up each recommendation with data or case studies.
   • Implementation Considerations: Discuss feasibility and potential challenges.

Step 3: Writing the Conclusion Section

1. Summarize Key Findings
   • Reiterate the main points of your paper without introducing new information.
   • Highlight the most important discoveries from your research.
2. Explain the Significance of Your Research
   • Discuss the broader impact of your findings.
   • Explain how your research contributes to the field of cybersecurity.
3. Engage the Reader
   • End with a thought-provoking statement or question.
   • Suggest areas for future research.

Step 4: Formatting and Finalizing Your Work

1. Adhere to APA Format
   • Use 12-pt Times New Roman font, double spacing, and 1-inch margins.
   • Include in-text citations and a properly formatted reference section.
   • Ensure your references are no older than five years.
2. Review for Clarity and Cohesion
   • Check for logical flow between sections.
   • Proofread for grammar, spelling, and APA compliance.
3. Submit on Time
   • Your assignment is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
   • Double-check submission requirements to avoid penalties.

Final Checklist Before Submission

✅ Recommendations provide actionable steps with supporting evidence.
✅ Conclusion effectively summarizes research and leaves an impact.
✅ Paper follows APA formatting guidelines.
✅ References are recent (within the last five years).
✅ Proofread and checked for coherence.

By following this guide, you’ll be able to craft a well-structured and impactful Recommendations and Conclusion section that aligns with the course objectives. Good luck!

Submission Type: 6-to-8-page paper that includes three appraisal appendices at the end.
Details:
Last week, you identified a few quantitative research studies to help answer your PICOT question. In this two-week assignment, you will critically appraise three of the studies to evaluate the evidence they offer. At least one study must be a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Examples of rapid critical appraisal checklists that can be used for different types of quantitative studies are linked at the bottom of this assignment. Each critical appraisal will address the (1) validity, (2) reliability, and (3) applicability of the study.
After appraising the three studies, write a paper addressing each study’s validity, reliability, and applicability. Use APA formatting and include an introduction and conclusion. Be sure to include a reference page and appendix with copies of the completed critical appraisal checklists for each of the three studies.
This assignment should be no more than 6-8 pages (not including the title or references pages) and include the following components:
Title Page
Introduction: include a summary of the primary intent of your paper
For each of the three studies, use the appropriate appraisal tool, address all items, and include detailed write-ups for:

The validity of the study,
The reliability of the study,
The applicability of the study.

Conclusion
Reference Page
Appendix

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

This assignment requires you to critically appraise three quantitative research studies to evaluate the evidence they offer, focusing on their validity, reliability, and applicability. Below is a step-by-step guide to help you navigate through the process of appraising these studies and structuring your paper effectively.

1. Understand the Requirements

Before starting, ensure you understand the three key elements you’ll be evaluating:

• Validity: This refers to how well the study measures what it intends to measure and whether the results are accurate.
• Reliability: This addresses the consistency of the study’s measurements and whether the results can be replicated.
• Applicability: This focuses on how relevant the study’s findings are to your practice, population, or context.

2. Select the Three Studies

You will need to select three quantitative research studies that you have identified in the previous week. At least one of these studies must be a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT). Make sure the studies are closely related to your PICOT question, as this will help make your appraisals more meaningful.

3. Use the Appraisal Checklists

Utilize the rapid critical appraisal checklists for each study, focusing on the validity, reliability, and applicability of the research. These checklists will guide you through the necessary steps for each type of study. For example, RCT checklists will differ slightly from cohort or case-control study checklists, so use the relevant one for each study.

4. Structure Your Paper

Title Page

Create a title page following APA format, with the title of your paper, your name, and institutional information.

Introduction

• Briefly explain the purpose of your paper.
• Provide a summary of the studies you will be appraising and how they relate to your PICOT question.

Study 1: Appraisal

• Validity: Assess whether the study design appropriately tests the hypothesis or research question. Did it use a randomized design? Were there any biases that might affect the results? Discuss the strength of the internal and external validity.
• Reliability: Discuss whether the study’s results are consistent and replicable. Were the methods and instruments used reliable? Consider factors like sample size, measurement tools, and any potential sources of error.
• Applicability: Evaluate how the results can be applied to the population or context you are working with. Do the findings align with real-world settings? Would you be able to implement the results in clinical practice?

Study 2: Appraisal

• Repeat the process from Study 1 for the second study, ensuring you address the validity, reliability, and applicability for this research.

Study 3: Appraisal

• Repeat the process again for the third study, making sure to apply the appraisal checklists and consider the study’s validity, reliability, and applicability.

Conclusion

• Summarize the findings from your appraisals.
• Reflect on the overall quality of the three studies, comparing their strengths and weaknesses.
• Discuss how the studies contribute to answering your PICOT question and what the implications for clinical practice are.

References

• List all the references for the studies you appraised and any other sources you used in APA format.

Appendix: Completed Critical Appraisal Checklists

• Include a copy of the completed critical appraisal checklists for each of the three studies in the appendix of your paper.

5. Writing Tips

• Be clear and concise: Keep your writing focused on evaluating the studies. Be direct in discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each study.
• Use evidence: Make sure to support your evaluations with specific details from the studies. For example, if you’re assessing validity, point to any biases or issues in study design that could undermine the findings.
• APA Format: Ensure that you follow APA formatting for the title page, in-text citations, and references page. Use double-spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and 1-inch margins.
• Be organized: Make sure your paper is well-structured and flows logically from one section to the next.

6. Proofread and Submit

Once you’ve finished writing, take time to proofread your paper for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Ensure your citations and references are correctly formatted in APA style. Then, submit your paper on time!

Prepare a final risk report (5-7 pages) that identifies privacy and security-related risks from throughout the quarter. Include evidence-based recommendations; action plans; and best practices, policies, and procedures to support the recommendations and action plans.

Write a security report (4-5 pages) that identifies potential security and technical safeguard violations in a health care organization’s audit report. Include evidence-based recommendations to address these potential violations and prevent them from occurring in the future.

Develop a release of patient information compliance checklist (3-4 pages) for hospital staff members to follow. Include an introduction that covers the HIPAA Privacy Rule, proper and improper use of health information, and existing controls to protect patient confidentiality and privacy.