Category: Applied Sciences homework help

Before taking on an assignment, you will review the content and only use the attached references and resources. No plagiarism or original work is to be done. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ALLOWED!!
Discussion: Deriving Organizational Culture from Organizational Theory
According to Manion (2011),
Today the opportunities and possibilities for leaders are endless, as are the challenges. … The more a leader understands these issues, the more likely it is that he or she can find the strength and courage to meet the test that these challenges present. A handful of representative challenges include these:
Accelerating levels of ambiguity and uncertainty
Workforce issues
Diversity in the workforce
Turbulent business and regulatory environments
The leader’s energy drain
For this assignment, discuss these five challenges in detail. Identify a method of overcoming each of these challenges as a health care leader.

Before taking on an assignment, you will review the content and only use the attached references and resources. No plagiarism or original work is to be done. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ALLOWED!!Within the attachment I’ve also attached my test results to help out with this assignment
HEALTH CARE LEADERSHIP
Chapter 2: Determining Your Own Leadership Style in Leadership for Health Professionals: Theory, Skills, and Applications (2nd ed.) provides an assortment of leadership and personality assessments:
Ledlow, G. J. R., & Coppola, M. N. (2014). Chapter 2: Determining your own leadership style. In Leadership for health professionals: Theory, skills, and applications (2nd ed.). [Books24x7 version]. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Part 1:Complete the following:
Review the chapter in the text to get a better appreciation for each of the assessments listed above.
Complete each leadership and personality assessment listed. (Note: you will need to copy or remember your results of each assessment.)
Part 2:In a 3- to 4-page paper, complete the following:
Compare and contrast the results of each assessment. Be sure to provide a detailed interpretation.
Identify what you learned new about yourself through completing the leadership and personality assessments.
Based on your self-assessment results, devise a plan to improve any weaknesses while leveraging your strengths.
Important Result Links
https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/type-1/https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/OEPS/results.php?s=100,75,44,50,69,75,75,69,50
In your scholarly paper, you should include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. 
SLP Assignment Expectations
Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis.
Limit your response to a maximum of 4 pages, not including the title or reference pages.
Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: Angelo State University Library. (n.d.).Library guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment: Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source: Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric.

Before taking on an assignment, you will review the content and only use the attached references and resources. No plagiarism or original work is to be done. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ALLOWED!!
HEALTH CARE LEADERSHIP
Assignment Overview
It is vital as a leader that you understand the difference between leadership and management. In addition, as a leader you must know and possess a variety of skills to lead an organization. While different skills are needed for different types of organizations, there are some fundamentals skills that every leader should have.
Case Assignment
Chapter 3 of Principles of Healthcare Leadership discusses four necessary leadership skills. For your Module 1 Case assignment, review these four necessary leadership skills and conduct additional research. In a 3- to 4-page paper, complete the following:
Explain the difference between leadership and management. Provide an example for each.
Identify and explain each leadership skill in detail.
Rationalize the importance of a health care leader possessing each of these skills.
Identify the importance of cultural diversity in leadership and discuss two ways (actionable items) a leader could promote diversity in the workplace. Discuss the difference in internal and external diversity and provide an example of each, and how they influence the organization.
In conjunction with the four identified skills, identify and explain 2 or 3 additional skills health care leaders should possess.
Rotenstein, L. S., Reede, J. Y., & Jena, A. B. (2021). Addressing workforce diversity- A quality-improvement framework. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(12), 1083-1086. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2032224
Assignment Expectations
Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis.
Limit your response to a maximum of 4 pages, not including the title and reference page.
Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals:
Angelo State University Library. (n.d.).Library guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric.

urpose
This assignment allows the learner to apply knowledge gained about health promotion concepts and strategies, enhance written communication skills, and demonstrate a beginning understanding of cultural competency. 
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
1. Discuss the professional nurse’s role in health promotion activities. (PO 1 and 2) 
3. Discuss health promotion, illness prevention, health maintenance, health restoration, and rehabilitation in relation to the nurse’s role in working with various populations. (PO 1, 2, and 8)
7. Identify health promotion strategies throughout the life span. (PO 1, 2, and 4)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
Total points possible: 100 points
Preparing the assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
1) Identify a health problem or need for health promotion for a particular stage in the life span of a population from a specific culture in your area. 
2) Choose one of the Leading Health Indicator (LHI) priorities from Healthy People. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/leading-health-indicators 
3) Research a topic related to health and wellness associated with one of the Healthy People topic areas.
4) Submit your topic to the instructor for approval at least 2 weeks prior to the final assignment due date, but earlier if desired. All topics must be approved. 
5) You will develop an educational health promotion project addressing the population/culture in your area.
6) Use TurnItIn in time to make any edits that might be necessary based on the Similarity Index prior to submitting your paper to your faculty. Consult with your faculty about the acceptable Similarity Index for this paper. 
7) For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center page https://mychamberlain.sharepoint.com/sites/StudentResourceCenter/WC. 
8) Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric). 
a. Introduction and Conclusion- 15 points/15%
• Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area. 
• Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest. 
• Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper.
• Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper. 
b. Relate Topic to Target Population- 25 points/25%
• Describes the topic and target cultural population.
• Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.
• Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area. 
• Applies health promotion concepts. 
c. Summary of Articles- 25 points/25%
• A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources.  
• Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content.
• At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group.  
• Summaries all key points and findings from the articles.
• Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.
• Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples. 
d. Health Promotion Discussion – 25 points/25%
• Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic. 
• The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population.
• Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population.
• Applies health promotion strategies.  
e. APA Style and Organization – 10 points/10%
• TurnItIn is used prior to submitting paper for grading. 
• Revisions are made based on TurnItIn originality report. 
• References are submitted with assignment.
• Use current APA format and is free of errors.
• Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.
• Paper is 3-4 pages, excluding title and reference pages.
• Information is organized around required components and flows in a logical sequence. 

Misophonia, Maladaptive Schemas and Personality Disorders: A Report of Three Cases
Participants
Participants were 2 women (age 25 and 41) and 1 man (age 46) all Caucasian.
Roberto, 46 years old, is a manager who is in a stable romantic relationship. Elena is 41 years old and a professor who is married with two children. Giorgia is a 25 years old university student with no relationship status, however she has a good relationship with her mother and turbulent relationship with her dad (Natalini et al, 2019). The recruitment and enrollment process for participants was very limited, for this study to be considered effective I believe it needed to be on a large scale. According to Tappen (2022) there are many factors that may have contributed to the very small number recruited in this study one could be failure to do a needs-based assessment before doing the study. Researchers who believe deeply in the importance and value of their study are likely to be more successful recruiting participants.
Data Collection/Generation Methods
Questionnaires were the method of choice for data collection. Participants also had structured interviews (Natalini et al, 2019).
 Limitations
The limitations in this study were that it was a very small sample size with only one race, it was not equal in that their where two women and one man. The study also did not address history of trauma, disturbed attachment, and emotional dysregulation (Natalini et al, 2019). Limitations like these in studies can negatively affect the study and limit to whom these findings are applicable. Limitations and the need for further development of existing concepts, theories, and frameworks are often indicated in the reviews of theory underpinning research studies (Tappen, 2022).
References
Natalini, E., Dimaggio, G., Varakliotis, T., Fioretti, A., & Eibenstein, A. (2019, August 8). Misophonia, maladaptive schemas and personality disorders: A report of three cases. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 50(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-019-09438-3
Tappen, R. (2022). Advanced nursing research: From theory to practice. (3rd ed.) Salisbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning ISBNs: 9781284231762, 1284231763, 9781284231755, 23175-5
PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS POST.   must include an 1 APA reference to a relevant scholarly article. 1 PARAGRAPH PLEASE

Unit 5 – Individual Project (250 points)
Due: Sun, Apr 21 |Printer Friendly VersionDescription
Add a Summary and Recommendations section to your Supply Chain Process Improvement Proposal. This section will summarize your findings and specify your recommendations for the organization you chose as the basis for your improvement proposal. Present a case for sustainable supply chains and an overall recommendation for improvement to the company you have chosen for this project.
Summary and Recommendations (600 words)
Provide company findings for improvement initiatives supporting a responsive and efficient supply chain operation. 
Describe how the supply chain sustainment elements of governance, environment, social, and economic (financial) can impact the supply chain performance of your selected company.
Update your previously completed sections based on instructor and peer feedback. Your final Supply Chain Process Improvement Proposal should consist of the following:
Title Page
Section 1: Company Profile
Section 2: Supply Chain Management Flows
Section 3: Organizations and Functions
Section 4: Third-Party Logistics (3PL)
Section 5: Relationships and Strategies
Section 6: Measurement and Management
Section 7: Global Supply Chain
Section 8: Summary and Recommendations
Reference Section

Critiquing a Research Article for Quality Standards
Research Issue and Purpose: The research problem is not clearly stated, and the aim of the research is also unclear. The authors propose to search for personality disorders (PDs) as well as maladaptive interpersonal schemas in patients with misophonia. However, they fail to present a clear rationale or research questions.
Participants: The sample size is too small, with only three participants involved. Therefore, the small sub-sample size decreases the generalizability of the findings and hinders the researchers from drawing any serious conclusions (Riener et al., 2020). Additionally, the authors do not provide enough information concerning the sampling method or about who is excluded from this research.
Research Design: There is no clear outline of the principal research design in the study. It seems to be a case series or qualitative study, but the authors do not clearly state the design or give a reason for their decision.
Data Collection/Generation Methods: Researchers applied different tools including the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (A-MISO-S), On-Structured Clinical Inventory for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II), Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-L3), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) (Natalini et al., 2019). However, they do not include evidence of the suitability and credibility of these tools as it relates to their study.
In general, the study appeared to involve several methodological issues, comprising a small sample size, lack of clarity in research design, and inappropriate discussion of the limitations and implications. It is highly recommended that the authors address these problems to improve the validity and reliability of the study.
References
Natalini, E., Dimaggio, G., Varakliotis, T., Fioretti, A., & Eibenstein, A. (2019). Misophonia, maladaptive schemas and personality disorders: A report of three cases. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 50(1), 29–35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-019-09438-3
Riener, G., Schneider, S. O., & Wagner, V. (2020). Addressing validity and generalizability concerns in field experiments. MPI Collective Goods Discussion Paper, (2020/16). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3637868
PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS POST.   must include an 1 APA reference to a relevant scholarly article. 1 PARAGRAPH PLEASE

 
A recent addition to the standard financial responsibility verbiage in the standard physician forms is the agreement to pay or accept responsibility to pay for services if the insurance company does not cover the visit or portions thereof. Wait! What? Isn’t that why I have insurance? Isn’t that what my premiums are for and what my co-pay covers? This is all too common today, and the policies (our policies) are too confusing to read and know exactly what our responsibility is. Coincidence? Discuss your feelings about the physician’s office or hospital’s level of commitment to verifying benefits and assuming responsibility for their errors.
Consider your feelings on making policies “plain language” so they can be understood and quickly clarified. Should you, as the patient, be responsible if your insurance company does not pay for a service that your physician orders? Should you be responsible for fighting to get that service paid for? Back up your opinions with references and in-text citations to course readings, lectures, or external articles.

Having the ability to identify contextual information and level of need is important. Additionally, social workers must understand that policy making is a process that involves numerous steps, starting with the identification and awareness of a social problem.
Consider the policy-making process, your personal skills, and related experience, and identify the skills that you already possess. Also, identify the areas in which you feel the need to further develop skills.
Posts should reflect your personal and professional experience—and all posts and responses should be supported by recent scholarly research with APA-formatted citations and references.

1) Explain any weaknesses of your research proposal/project that you are completing this week.
2) Describe how you addressed those weaknesses.
3) Elaborate on any other challenges that occurred while compiling your research project.
4) The checklist must be two double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style.