Paragraph one – Write a 150 world discussion describing why you think most people rely on consequentialist theories to run their daily lives? Why do they live morally under the consequentialist banner? Is it easier? Does having outside forces controlling our behavior make us more likely to do the “right” thing?
Paragraph Two – Write a 150 word discussion exploring Utilitarianism. How does it treat the minority in a group of people? What about an individual’s human rights? Does Utilitarianism work for living an ethical life? What does it have in common with theories like subjectivism or relativism? Would you want to be a minority living under a Utilitarian society? Why or why not?
Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!
Paragraph One:
Many people rely on consequentialist theories to navigate their daily lives because these theories focus on the outcomes of their actions, offering a clear, pragmatic framework for decision-making. By emphasizing the consequences, individuals are often more motivated to make choices that align with their desired outcomes, such as personal happiness or societal good. Consequentialist thinking is appealing because it simplifies complex moral dilemmas by asking, “What is the best result?” It’s easier for people to live by this approach because it provides clear guidelines—actions are judged based on their consequences, and the “right” choice is often the one that leads to the most positive outcome for the greatest number of people. Additionally, societal norms or laws may act as external forces guiding behavior, making it easier for individuals to follow expected moral standards without deep contemplation. People may feel more secure when external rules dictate their actions, reinforcing compliance with the “right” thing.
Paragraph Two:
Utilitarianism, a form of consequentialism, advocates for actions that maximize overall happiness, often described as “the greatest good for the greatest number.” However, this principle raises concerns about how it treats minority groups. In utilitarian ethics, the rights and welfare of individuals may be sacrificed if doing so benefits the majority. The theory prioritizes collective well-being, sometimes at the expense of individual human rights, potentially allowing actions that undermine minority interests. While utilitarianism offers a straightforward approach to ethical living, it aligns more with subjectivism or relativism because it considers the impact of actions based on varying circumstances and outcomes. As a minority living under utilitarian principles, one might feel at risk of being overlooked or sacrificed for the majority’s benefit. Thus, while utilitarianism may work for ensuring the welfare of the majority, it can be problematic for protecting individual rights, especially those of vulnerable populations.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount