Formatting for this paper: The paper should not exceed 6 pages with 1.5 line spa

Formatting for this paper: The paper should not exceed 6 pages with 1.5 line spacing and Arial 11 font (or similar) (1 point). References and in-text citations should be in APA format. Component of the Paper should follow: Part 1: Public Health Significance (4 points) For your case study, explain the public health significance of the issue being addressed by the intervention. Following the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model (social, epidemiological, and behavioral assessments; found in Crosby, 2011 in Module 3 Learning Resources), review publicly available data and peer-reviewed evidence including past evaluation studies to justify and present a compelling need and urgency of your public health topic and reference local NYC data when available. Part 2: Develop New Intervention Prototype (5 points) Referring to your group BDI logic model, re-examine your case study intervention activities. Following Transcreation in steps 1-4, outline a new intervention prototype taking into consideration weaknesses identified in the existing case study intervention. The following steps will guide you through this part of the assignment: Identify community infrastructure and partners, focusing on your assigned case study intervention program. What kind of community resources and partners does your intervention utilize? Think about what what was covered on asset mapping in class (Module 4) and use this as a guide to identifying key community partners. (2 points) Specify your theory of behavioral change (theory can be consistent with what you discussed with your group for Discussion Board Assignment 1) (1 point) Design and describe your new intervention prototype. Identify all the activities of the intervention. You can preserve existing activities already assigned to your case study, but you are required to propose at least one new activity; multiple novel activities are permissible. Think about the theory you selected. What additional intervention activities are missing from the existing case study intervention that can be mapped on to the theoretical constructs or determinants? (2 points)