Engagement with and analysis of a debate–For this essay, you will write a 4-5 p

Engagement with and analysis of a debate–For this essay, you will write a 4-5 page argument and analysis that engages with the the critique of the discourse of Gay Chicano literary absence as articulated in Antonio Vigo′s essay ″The Place of Gay Male Chicano Literature in Queer Chicana/o Cultural Work″ and in Luz Calvo and Catriona Esquibel′s response to his argument ″Our Queer Kin.″.
In this essay, you will become a participant, even a mediator, in the argument you see unfolding between Viego and Calvo and Esquibel.
NOTE: This essay invites you to practice a w skills crucial to college writing, critical thinking, and logical argumentation.
Due to the nature of the argument we see emerge, especially due to Calvo and Esquibel′s frequent misreadings and misrepresentations of Vigo′s text and their defensive posturing in their response to his essay, you are practicing the art of respectfully critiquing an argument/paper/writer. In other words, much of what you will be doing in this paper is identifying and explaining Calvo and Esquibel′s misreadings, potentially thinking about the effect (rhetorical effects) of the misreading, and offering a corrective by referring to Viego.
Instructions: For this assignment, I recommend that, in addition to having as thorough an understanding of Vigo′s argument as possible, you select 3-4 main points that help you think about both of the articles together. Some questions to consider may include: How does the response work with or against Viego? Is there anything the response misses, overlooks, or misunderstands? What, if any, are agreements between the two works?
Requirements: MLA Heading and Formatting; 4.5-5 page double-spaced, Works Cited Page (NOTE: Works Cited pages do not count toward page length requirements).
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)