In a fully developed short essay (minimum of 500-750 words in length), please answer the questions below and post your essay to the discussion forum. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion.
Remember that you are having a conversation with your peers in this particular genre of writing, so adopt an appropriate tone and vocabulary for an audience of fellow college students. Please take some time to edit your work for punctuation, usage, and clarity before submission. To earn full credit for the discussion, please comment on the work of at least one peer in a three-paragraph response.
Guidelines and Questions for Analysis
1. Write an introduction with a thesis statement.
2. What role should logic play in modern arguments? Which approach to reasoning do you think will be most useful for you in the research argument that you will develop in this course?
3. Using at least three of the common fallacies described in this learning module, explain which errors in logic you see most frequently in your daily experience with the news, politics, and advertising. Please link to a news story, advertisement, or opinion piece in supporting your view (you should have at least one hyperlink for this discussion, although you don’t need to include a “Works Cited” list as part of your discussion post).
4. In reflecting on Jones’s essay, “Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic,” how can we, as participants in American culture, foster a healthier environment for productive debate? Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the future of finding common ground in these important public discussions? Explain your views on finding common ground in the arguments that we engage with as participants in a complex and diverse culture.
5. Write a concluding paragraph.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount