The third reading response is due at 10 pm on March 3 Sunday. Late submissions w

The third reading response is due at 10 pm on March 3 Sunday.
Late submissions will not be accepted.
You may not submit reading responses for lectures for which you are absent.
Please use all three readings for March1 on Nuclear Catastrophes and Post-Apocalypse Vision:
Lisa Yoneyama. “On Testimonial Practices.” Hiroshima Traces: Time, Space, and the Dialectic of Memory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. 85-111.
Susan Napier. “Waiting for the End of the World: Apocalyptic Identity.” Anime From Akira to Howl’s Moving Castle: Experiencing Contemporary Japanese Animation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 249-274.
Jean-Luc Nancy. After Fukushima: The Equivalence of Catastrophes. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015. 9-41.
Please use Times New Roman font (12 point), double-spaced. Reading responses should be between 600 and 700 words. Please remember that the readings reflect the views of the authors and that you should engage with them critically. You should focus on one issue in an article and make connections between articles based on those issues rather than providing a summary of each reading. We should be able to see in your writing that you have read the articles/ chapters.
You may use Chicago or MLA style for your citations, but please be consistent in your citation style.
Please give reference to readings using footnotes. Please include a works cited / bibliography page.
Please see the rubric below: