Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to complete the recommendations section and piece all of the work that I have done so far together based on the feedback that I have been given and submit a final polished final paper that is only 4-6 full pages that meets and addresses all of the requirements listed and makes sure that everything being asked for in the rubric is addressed.
Recommendations: In this section, you will utilize the knowledge you gained from your malpractice and ethical analyses to recommend and defend strategies that would help improve medical practices and avoid future liability.Recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future.
Defend how your recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient.
Final Submission: Malpractice
In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This milestone will be graded with the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
What to Submit
Your case study should be a 4- to 6-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to the most recent APA guidelines.Final Project Rubric
CriteriaExemplaryProficientNeeds ImprovementNot EvidentValue
Introduction: SummarizeN/ASummarizes the case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period of the incident that occurred (100%)Summarizes the case, but summary is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, or does not include information on stakeholders, the problem, or the time period of the incident (55%)Does not summarize the case (0%)2.24
Medical Malpractice Component: Legal ComponentsMeets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of the key legal components of the case (100%)Explains the key legal components of the case, including the nature of the issue and the rules that applied (85%)Explains the key legal components of the case, but analysis is illogical, contains inaccuracies, or does not include the nature of the issue or the rules that applied (55%)Does not explain the key legal components of the case (0%)10.61
Medical Malpractice Component: Malpractice PoliciesMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of which policies address the issues within the case (100%)Determines relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case (85%)Determines malpractice policies, but response lacks detail, or the chosen policies are irrelevant or do not address the issues of the case (55%)Does not determine relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case (0%)10.61
Medical Malpractice Component: Standard of CareMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates astute ability in applying what the law states about standard of care to determine whether or not it was breached in the case (100%)Analyzes the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim, and applies what the law states about standard of care to support whether or not it was breached in the case (85%)Analyzes the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim, but does not apply what the law states about standard of care (55%)Does not analyze the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim (0%)6.37
Medical Malpractice Component: Cultural BackgroundsMeets “Proficient” criteria, and analysis makes cogent connections between the incident and its impact on healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds (100%)Analyzes how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds (85%)Analyzes how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds, but analysis is cursory or contains inaccuracies (55%)Does not analyze how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds (0%)10.61
Medical Malpractice Component: AccountabilityMeets “Proficient” criteria, and assessment makes a cogent connection to the level of accountability held against the healthcare provider based on the severity of the case (100%)Assesses the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity and explains the level of accountability the healthcare provider was held to (85%)Assesses the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity and explains the level of accountability the healthcare provider was held to, but explanation lacks detail or is illogical (55%)Does not assess the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity (0%)6.37
Ethical Component: Ethical IssuesMeets “Proficient” criteria, and research and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the ethical issues led to the malpractice case (100%)Describes the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, and supports with research and relevant examples (85%)Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, but description lacks details or does not support with research and relevant examples (55%)Does not describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and does not explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident (0%)7.96
Ethical Component: Ethical TheoryMeets “Proficient” criteria, and research and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the ethical theory would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (100%)Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, and supports with research and relevant examples from the case (85%)Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but description lacks detail, is illogical, or does not support with research or relevant examples (55%)Does not describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (0%)7.96
Ethical Component: Shared Decision- Making ModelMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of appropriate physician–patient shared decision-making models that would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (100%)Selects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (85%)Selects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but explanation lacks detail (55%)Does not select a physician– patient shared decision-making model and does not explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (0%)7.96
Ethical Component: Ethical GuidelinesMeets “Proficient” criteria and makes a cogent connection between the proposed ethical guidelines and how they would prevent the current and future incidents (100%)Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents (85%)Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursory (55%)Does not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the current and future incidents (0%)7.96
Ethical Component: DefendMeets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections among the proposed ethical guidelines and how to hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (100%)Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (85%)Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but defense lacks detail or is illogical (55%)Does not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (0%)6.37
Recommendations: Preventative StrategiesMeets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations masterfully demonstrate how the healthcare provider can avoid liability in the future (100%)Recommends preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future (85%)Recommends preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future, but recommendations are cursory or illogical (55%)Does not recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future (0%)6.37
Recommendations: DefendMeets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections among the recommended preventative strategies and how they would assist in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (100%)Defends how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (85%)Defends how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but defense is cursory or illogical (55%)Does not defend how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (0%)6.37
Articulation of ResponseSubmission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to- read format (100%)Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%)Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%)Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%)2.24
Total:100%
Requirements: 4-6 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.
Please be sure to use scholarly sources published within the last 5 years. Please be sure to also read, use, and cite the required law case attached.