Do the assigments in a separte word document Document #1: READ the case excerpt of Schneider Elec. SA v. Commission in the textbook at pp. 584-585. RESPOND to the follow questions: 1. Schneider and Legrande did not sell the same product. Why was their concentration a threat to competition? 2. Why would a combination of parties with “complementary” products create a threat to competition? How would this disadvantage competitors with only one of the complementary products? 3. What impliactions does this have for a maker of a personal computer operating system acquiring a company that sells software applications? Be thorough but concise. You can write a single, extended response or break down each question separately — I am interested in content not form. Your response should be no more than 350 words in length. While there is no minimum length requirement, I expect you to make a direct response to each question and also include a concise explanation of your response. Document#2: READ the Ethical Considerations feature found in the textbook at p. 543 and the course readings for this unit. RESPOND to the follow questions: Is there a correlation betwen the level of economic development in these states and the gender gap? Given these results, are differences in the treatment of women defensible on the basis of cultural relativism, which teachs that different societies have different moral codes and there is no objective standard that can be used to judge one moral code better than another? Why or why not? (no less than 250 words)
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount