Compose a paper that addresses the following: Explain why you chose to watch thi

Compose a paper that addresses the following:
Explain why you chose to watch this particular theorist’s video.
Describe the parts of your personal philosophy where you agree or disagree with this theorist.
Is there anything that surprised you in the video? If so, what surprised you?
Would you recommend this video to another student? If so, why would you recommend it?
What value did you receive from watching it?
Your paper should be 2–3 pages in length, in APA format, typed in Times New Roman with 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins. If outside sources are used, they must be cited appropriately.
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
40 to >32.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the theorist video. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions regarding the value of watching the specific theorist video. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the theorists’ ideas and how they relate to the student’s personal philosophy.
32.8 to >30.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts within the theorist video. Offers some detail and some examples regarding the value of watching the specific theorist. Makes some attempt to relate the theorist’s ideas to the student’s personal philosophy.
30 to >23.6 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts within the theorist video. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for the value of watching the specific theorist. Fails to relate the theorist’s ideas to the student’s personal philosophy.
23.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, responds with insufficient explanations for theorist choice, video value, and relation to personal philosophy.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
40 to >32.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Includes explanation for why the student chose to watch the specific theorist. Describes the value of watching the video. Explains whether or not the student would recommend the video to another student and why.
32.8 to >30.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Includes explanation for why the student chose to watch the specific theorist. Describes the value of watching the video, but does not explain whether the student would recommend the video to another student and why.
30 to >23.6 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations of why the student chose the specific theorist video and the value of watching the video, although attempts are made. There is no mention of recommendations.
23.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the content in the video.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
15 to >12.3 ptsMeets Expectations
Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
12.3 to >11.25 ptsApproaches Expectations
Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
11.25 to >8.85 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
8.85 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
5 to >4.1 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
4.1 to >3.75 ptsApproaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.
3.75 to >2.95 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
2.95 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Video that must be watched is