DQ #1 is based on the following case: Fiat Chrysler: From Alliance to Acquisitio

DQ #1 is based on the following case:
Fiat Chrysler: From Alliance to Acquisition
In 2009, Chrysler went bankrupt. When it emerged from bankruptcy, it was owned by the U.S. government, the Canadian government, the United Auto Workers, and Fiat. Chrysler and Fiat combined their strengths to find success. Chrysler repaid its loans and repurchased its shares from the U.S. and Canadian governments. Over time, Fiat continued to buy shares of Chrysler. In 2009, Fiat owned 20% of Chrysler. By 2014, Fiat owned 100% of Chrysler. The relationship that started as an alliance in 2009 became an acquisition in 2014.
DQ 1 :Consider the decision by Italian automaker Fiat to take control of troubled Chrysler. Rather than expanding on its own, the company decided to acquire Chrysler. What were the benefits of this decision? Were there any risks involved? How does Fiat’s decision to acquire rather than establish a new venture help the company? Are there any drawbacks to this approach? Fiat Chrysler recently announced that it would sell off its exclusive Ferrari brand. What are the implications of this decision?
DQ # 2
Why Do Acquisitions Fail? Please provide some examples from the real life.