ESSAY QUESTION:
‘[The] supposed doctrine [of veil piercing], which is controversial and uncertain, and
which, on analysis, appears never to have been invoked successfully and
appropriately in its 80 years of supposed existence, should be given its quietus.’
Lord Neuberger in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others [2013] UKSC 34 [79]
Critically evaluate this statement.
in other words, you are thinking about if it should be abolished.
– Be sure to use theories as well as law and cases.
– Use cases if they demonstrate the legal point.
– Use journal articles and textbooks.
– Think about how arguments are used and presented in the essay.
– Avoid contractions such as doesn’t don’t etc.
– Tell the story as to how you got there in your essay.
– Show that you know how to do research by showing what you researched and applying it to the question.
– Use at least 2 academic journal articles.
– Be sure to apply the law to the question.
– Theories section is not examinable like other topics.
– Think in a way what you think about this argument but demonstrate how your opinion is backed up.
– In the bibliography write down all the things you have read.
– Do research first then attempt questions.
this is a company law essay. this is a UK assignment and therefore please use UK laws.
please use oscola referencing there are YouTube videos on how to do this.
some books to use are:
– Hannigan. B. Company Law publisher: OUP
– Mayson, French and Ryan on Company Law Publisher: OUP
– Roach, Lee Company Law Publisher: OUP
a good place to find journal articles is Google Scholar.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount