Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Pick a favorite topic from the week 6 or week 7 lessons (readings). Write an essay that fully develops that single topic. Introduce one related research article or idea (within the last 10 years) that has impacted the topic you have chosen. Develop a conclusion that pulls together your ideas and explains why the topic you picked is important.
READ and ALIGN your paper to the RUBRIC
Submission in MS word or RTF format only.
Do not recopy the question back into your paper.
Double spaced.
This is not a personal narrative so no personal pronouns- keep it objective. There should not be “I”, “you” or “we” or other personal pronouns in your paper.
This paper is APA format- not MLA. I need to see correct formating. Make sure you also include a running head, title page is correct, font is correct, abstract is included, references are listed in alphabetical order, there is an in-text citation for your references.
The topic I am wanting to discuss is challenging behavior in young children.
CriteriaExemplaryAccomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did Not Attempt
Criterion Score
Content
40 points
The paper’s content was on one topic from the week 6-7 readings.
The paper contained statements regarding why the topic is important and why the content of the chosen scholarly article was important to the topic.
The topic was well developed and expanded upon in the body of the paper.
The conclusion restated the main points and the importance of the topic in an easily understood and accurate manner.
34 points
The paper’s content was on one topic from the week 6-7 readings.
The paper contained statements regarding the importance of the topic and the relevancy of the article, but some ideas were not fully developed. There were minor connections missing.
The conclusion included the main points of the paper and the importance of the topic but there may be some minor issues or lack of clarity.
30 points
The paper’s content was on one topic from the week 6 -7 readings.
The paper contained statements regarding the relevancy of the article to the topic, but the ideas had multiple important connections not developed.
The conclusion needed significantly more development.
26 points
The paper’s content was on one topic from week 6 -7 readings
The paper contained unclear or missing statements regarding the topic and/or the relevancy of the article to the topic.
The conclusion was absent.
0 points
No attempt or
the content was presented in an unclear or unsatisfactory manner,
or
with more than one topic, or
with unsatisfactory development of ideas.
Score of Content,
/ 40
Support from a Scholarly Source
15 points
Two authoritative references were used in total:
1.The paper introduced a scholarly and / or peer reviewed article published within the last 10 years that impacted the topic.
2. Another authoritative source was included to support ideas presented in the paper.
In-text citations and end of paper reference list were appropriately included.
12.75 points
Two authoritative references were used in total:
1.The paper introduced a scholarly and / or peer reviewed article published within the last 10 years that impacted the topic.
2. Another authoritative source was included to support ideas presented in the paper.
In-text citations and end of paper reference list were appropriately included.
11.25 points
One reference source was used:
The paper introduced an expert source published within the last 10 years that impacted the topic, but it was not scholarly and /or peer reviewed.
There may also have been issues with in-text citations or in the reference list.
9.75 points
The paper introduced a non-expert or unsatisfactory source published within the last 10 years that may have somewhat impacted the topic but it was not scholarly and /or peer reviewed. There may also have been issues with in-text citations or in the reference list.
0 points
No Attempt.
OR
Paper had no support from any sources.
Score of Support from a Scholarly Source,
/ 15
Academic Writing Format – APA
10 points
The paper was presented professionally and had appropriate APA
format with: cover page, font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
8.5 points
The paper was presented professionally but had 1 of the following APA elements missing: cover page, appropriate font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
7.5 points
The paper was presented but had 2-3 of the following APA elements missing: cover page, appropriate font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
6.5 points
The paper was presented with more than 4 APA elements missing: cover page, font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
0 points
No attempt.
OR
The paper has no or very minimal APA formatting.
Score of Academic Writing Format – APA,
/ 10
Depth and Detail
15 points
The body of the paper met the 1000 word minimum (excluding abstract/references.) The paper did not exceed 1400 words.
12.75 points
The paper did not achieve minimum depth but was within 20% of 1000 words, over or under. The paper was at least 800 words, but no more than 1600 words.
11.25 points
The paper did not achieve the minimum depth but was within 40% of 1000 words, over or under. The paper was at least 600 words, but not greater than 1800 words.
9.75 points
The paper did not achieve minimum depth. The paper was more than 40% short of 1000 words, over or under. The paper was less than 600 words or more than 2000 words.
0 points
No attempt.
Score of Depth and Detail,
/ 15
English Stylistics, grammar, spelling, punctuation
20 points
The paper was written in an essay format (not Q & A) and contained no or minimal errors in stylistics, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
17 points
The paper was written in an essay format (not Q & A) and contained a few errors which did not significantly detract from the content.
15 points
The paper was written in an essay format (not Q & A) but contained multiple errors which detracted from the content.
13 points
The paper was not written in an essay format and/or contained significant errors. The paper was not at college level expectations with regard to stylistics, grammar, spelling, punctuation.
0 points
No attempt OR minimal attempt with very significant errors that detracted from the content.
Score of English Stylistics, grammar, spelling, punctuation,
/ 20
TotalScore of CHFD311 Week 7 Assignment,
/ 100
Requirements: 1000-1400 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title, Abstract, and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation for each body paragraph.