Understanding how to read and understand scholarly research is important to evid

Understanding how to read and understand scholarly research is important to evidence-based clinical practice.For this assignment, choose a scholarly article containing a research study discussing the efficacy of a psychiatric treatment.You can research a specific medication, a diagnostic rating scale, TMS, ECT, an integrative or alternative treatment (e.g., MDMA, psychedelics, an herbal supplement, etc.), or a medication augmentation strategy that is used in psychiatry.
Use a peer, reviewed scholarly paper no older than 5 years with proper in-text citations and the reference in the references section AND include the link AND pdf of the full article.The article must be accessible to the public.

Use APA 7th Ed. with title page and references section.
1. Discuss the research study purpose, population, and how the study was conducted.
2. Explain the study findings and recommendations.
3. Analyze and discuss strengths and weaknesses of the study and whether you think the research supports the use of this intervention.
4. Support your opinion with at least one additional scholarly article.
Essay outline using subtopic bullet point format
Research study purpose

Population

How the study was conducted

Study findings

Study recommendations

Strengths of the study

Weaknesses of the study

For references, may also use course references below which may be found at libgen.is.
POTENTIAL REFERENCES
References
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders DSM 5-TR (5th ed. Text Revision). American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, Virginia. ISBN-10: 0890425760
Carlat, D. (2017). The Psychiatric Interview (4th Ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, ISBN-13: 978-1496327710 ISBN-10: 9781496327710
Stahl, S.M. (2020). Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology Prescriber’s Guide (7th Ed.). Cambridge University Press: New York, NY. ISBN-13: 978-1108926010 ISBN-10: 1108926010
Zimmerman, M. (2013). Interview Guide for Evaluating DSM-5 Psychiatric Disorders and the Mental Status Examination. Psych Products Press: East Greenwich, RI. ISBN-13: 978-0963382115 ISBN-10: 096338211X
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM- 5TR. Arlington, Virginia: APA ISBN-10 ‏: ‎ 089042580 ISBN-13 : ‎ 978-0890425800
Boland, R., Verduin, M.L & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry (12th Ed,). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA. ISBN-13: 978-1975145569; ISBN-10: 1975145569
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders DSM 5 (5th ed.).America Psychiatric Association: Arlington, Virginia
Boland, R., Verduin, M.L & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry:
Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry (12th Ed,). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:
Philadelphia, PA. ISBN-13: 978-1975145569; ISBN-10: 1975145569
Carlat, D. (2016). The Psychiatric Interview (4th Ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:
Philadelphia, PA. ISBN-13: 978-1496327710 ISBN-10: 9781496327710
Wheeler K. (2022). Psychotherapy for the Advanced Practice Psychiatric Nurse: A
How-To Guide for Evidence-Based Practice. 3rd Edition. Springer Publishing; New York,ISBN-13: 978-0826193797 ISBN-10: 082619379X
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-5 Arlington, Virginia: Author.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Corey, G. (2015). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (10th ed.). Brooks/Cole Publishing Company: Belmont, CA.
RUBRIC
Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

Timeliness
view longer description
5 pts
Initial posting and response on time.
3 pts
Initial posting is on time, response is late
1 pts
Initial posting is late and response is late
0 pts
No Marks
5 / 5 pts

Initial Posting
view longer description
25 pts
Posts well developed statement that fully addresses and develops all aspects of the task
15.79 pts
Posts well developed statement that addresses most aspects of the task; lacks full development of ideas.
7.89 pts
Posts adequate statement with superficial thought and preparation; doesn’t address all aspects of the task.
0 pts
No Marks
Comments
The discussion was to have synthesized the video clips and integrate this into the discussion prompts.
21 / 25 pts

Response Posting
view longer description
5 pts
Response to 2 peers are posted on time
3 pts
Responds to one post in timely manner, missing one response post
1 pts
2 response posts are completed but late
0 pts
No Marks
5 / 5 pts

Content Contribution
view longer description
25 pts
Demonstrates analysis of others’ post; extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts. All required responses. (At least 250 words)
15 pts
Elaborates on two response posts that are partially developed and needs further expansion OR one response post that extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts and one that is missing full development
13 pts
Elaborates on only one response post that extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts, no second response post
10 pts
Elaborates on one response posts that is partially developed and needs further expansion and missing one response post
0 pts
No response posts
25 / 25 pts

References & Support
view longer description
20 pts
Uses references to literature and readings, and personal experience to support comments.
12 pts
Incorporates some references from literature and personal experience.
6 pts
Uses personal experience, but no references to readings or research
0 pts
No Marks
20 / 20 pts

Clarity & Mechanics
view longer description
20 pts
Contributes to discussion with clear, concise comments formatted in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical or spelling errors.
12 pts
Contributes valuable information to discussion with minor clarity or mechanics errors.
6 pts
Communicates in courteous and helpful manner with some errors in clarity or mechanics.
0 pts
No Marks
20 / 20 pts

Total Points: 96

ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER NOW