During this course, you will be creating a Canvas module. You may have already c

During this course, you will be creating a Canvas module. You may have already created a module when you too NU600, or if you’ve not yet taken that course, you will be doing so. You will build upon your Canvas shell and modules throughout the program. During this specific course, you will create an introduction & to the topic for one of your modules, a resources page, and a quiz. Each of these assignments will be placed directly in a Canvas shell (see Unit 14 Assignment).
For the week 3 assignment, you chose a topic for your module that you are interested in teaching based on your identified path (If you’ve already completed a module in NU600, please make sure it is not the same topic, but related to the “course” you’d like to create—you’ll be developing the course details in NU635).
In this assignment, you will begin to draft your course resources information for your Canvas course shell lesson (see Unit 14 Assignment).
For this assignment, create a 2-page word document with a title/reference page and the information below.
The introduction should be 5-6 sentences long describing the topic you selected from unit 3 (do not use the same exact verbiage from that assignment, but rather provide a high-level overview of the topic).
Next, identify 3 scholarly resources for your resources page related to your selected topic from unit 3.
When considering your resources, think about what you want the nurses or students to take away from this resource.
The resources should be credible, scholarly, and from the last 5 years.
In your paper, list each resource, in APA format, and then describe the following:
The purpose of the resources
The benefit of using this resource
How the student may use this resource to support his/her learning of the identified topic
Be sure to provide a conclusion, as well.
Requirements
For this assignment, be sure to include the following assignment criteria in your paper:
An introduction that describes your course including some details. Be sure to use clear and concise language.
Describe the 3 resources as identified above.
A conclusion paragraph
Use peer-reviewed evidence-based resources from the last 5 years.
The paper should be at least 2 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.
Use APA formatting for your information and references in your required and supplemental sections
This should not be the same topic/information as done in a previous course.
Rubric
NU681 Unit 3 Week 6 Assignment – Course Resources Development Rubric
NU681 Unit 3 Week 6 Assignment – Course Resources Development Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Concepts
NU681-CO1; NU681-CO4
20 pts
5
Ideas and concepts are consistently clear and always well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are always discussed fairly and always synthesized in a logical fashion with strong, well-founded supporting arguments. All discussion and arguments are thoroughly supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.
18 pts
4
Ideas and concepts are clear and well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are discussed fairly and synthesized in a logical fashion with well-founded supporting arguments. Discussion and arguments are supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable
16 pts
3
Ideas and concepts are reasonably well explained. Discussion and arguments are, for the most part, supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable relationships between concepts, and ideas are discussed. These could be further strengthened with additional research or resource materials.
14 pts
2
Basic ideas and concepts are presented; however, they are under-developed and poorly explained. There is minimal evidence of a relationship between ideas and concepts. Discussion and arguments are not supported with additional research or research that is pertinent and valid.
12 pts
1
Some basic ideas and concepts are started, but not developed. There is no identifiable relationship between ideas and concepts. There is little or no discussion and/or argument with supporting research.
0 pts
0
There are no developed ideas or concepts. There is no supporting research.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
NU681-CO1; NU681-CO4
20 pts
5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
18 pts
4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
16 pts
3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
14 pts
2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
12 pts
1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions
5 pts
5
The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
4 pts
4
The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.
3 pts
3
The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
2 pts
2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
1 pts
1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I
5 pts
5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4 pts
4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3 pts
3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
2 pts
2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1 pts
1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.