Some instances of conjunctions do not neatly fit into Halliday and Hassan’s taxo

Some instances of conjunctions do not neatly fit into Halliday and Hassan’s taxonomy, thus incorporating additional classifications to make the analysis more comprehensive may be considered. Classification of conjunctions can include:
1. Grammatical Relationships:
• Coordinating Conjunctions: These conjunctions connect elements of equal grammatical rank, such as two independent clauses. Examples include “and,” “but,” “or,” “nor.”
• Subordinating Conjunctions: These conjunctions introduce subordinate clauses that depend on the main clause. Examples include “because,” “although,” “while.”
2. Semantic Relationships:
• Additive Conjunctions: These conjunctions indicate addition or accumulation of information. Examples include “also,” “moreover,” “furthermore.”
• Adversative Conjunctions: These conjunctions express contrast or contradiction. Examples include “however,” “nevertheless,” “on the other hand.”
• Causal Conjunctions: These conjunctions indicate cause and effect relationships. Examples include “since,” “because,” “therefore.”
• Temporal Conjunctions: These conjunctions express temporal relationships or time sequencing. Examples include “when,” “while,” “after,” “before.”
• Conditional Conjunctions: These conjunctions introduce conditional clauses. Examples include “if,” “unless,” “provided that.”
• Concessive Conjunctions: These conjunctions introduce clauses that express concessive relationships or unexpected outcomes. Examples include “although,” “even though,” “despite.”
DISCUSS THE ABOVE INFORMATION AND PROVIDE PROPER CITATIONS. AND END IT BY FOCUSING OH HALLIDAY AND HASSAN COHESION TAXONOMY. USE APA