Using CAQDAS Choose one QDA program – Atlas-ti, NVivo, MAXQDA, Dedoose, or anoth

Using CAQDAS
Choose one QDA program – Atlas-ti, NVivo, MAXQDA, Dedoose, or another QDA program – and work through the (free) demo. Make sure that you practice coding some demonstration transcriipt. Turn in the output from the demo. Write up a350- to 700-word reflectionabout the experience of qualitative data analysis.
Grading Rubric
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Chooses an Appropriate CAQDAS, and Finds its Demo
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – An appropriate CAQDAS is chosen and its demo found and eloquently described.
Proficient – An appropriate CAQDAS is chosen and its demo found and described
Basic – An appropriate CAQDAS is chosen and its demo found.
Below Expectations – Only partial completion of the demo.
Non-Performance – Did not do the activity.
Includes Coding for Demo, and Submits Output
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Demo includes coding and the output is submitted and eloquently described.
Proficient – Demo includes coding and the output is submitted and described.
Basic – Demo includes coding and the output is submitted.
Below Expectations – Either output is not submitted or coding not accomplished.
Non-Performance – Did not do the activity.
Writes a Page or Two about the Experiences of Qualitative Data Analysis
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Student wrote a detailed reflection about the experience of qualitative data analysis.
Proficient – Student wrote with some detail about the experience of qualitative data analysis.
Basic – Student wrote about the experience of qualitative data analysis.
Below Expectations – Less that a page was written about the experience or little insight was revealed.
Non-Performance – No reflection on the activity.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.