design a program evaluation proposal plan to evaluate the effectiveness of your

design a program evaluation proposal plan to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed interventions from your Unit 6 Assignment. Your plan should include the following elements:
First, identify what type of program evaluation you will be conducting (needs assessment, process, outcome or efficiency evaluation, or a combination of two or more) and explain why this type of evaluation is most useful for your program interventions (one page).
Next, explain the type of evaluation design, such as a pre-test, post-test, or post-test only design (one page).
Last, explain the data collection plan, including the methods for collecting data (new or existing data, probably or nonprobability), measurement tools, and any threats to internal and external validity and reliability (one page).
Below is a list of potential measurement tools for new and secondary data collection.
New Data (people):
Questionnaire
Interview-individual or group (explain type)
Focus group
Participant observations
Surveys (type)
Existing data
Existing reports
Secondary Data Analysis:
Census, client, and program data
Documents and reports
Data sets
Measurement instruments (include standardized measurement instruments)
Journals and diaries
Logs
Inventories
Summative instruments
Unit 6 Assignment:
Human Services Interventions Program
When creating efficient human services program interventions, the program’s goals, theoretical framework, problem-solving viewpoint, financing sources, and implementation strategy must be considered. Each of these elements will be covered in this essay, and the suggested solutions will be supported by evidence and theory.
Proposed Interventions, Purpose, and Objectives
Designing a human services program for a social issue or problem starts with identifying and outlining potential remedies. I have three recommendations for my project:
Safe Housing and Emergency Shelter Program
Purpose: The intervention will provide homeless youth/families with secure temporary Housing.
Goals: To provide youth/families who are homeless refuge and safety, assess their needs, and help them find safe, long-term Housing.
Intensive In-Home Services for Intact Families
Purpose: By addressing underlying issues in intact families, the intervention aims to improve family connections and prevent child removal.
Goals: The objectives are to identify and address family dysfunction, enhance parental abilities and dynamics, provide therapy, education, and support, and monitor the development of a stable family unit.
Financial Stability of DCFS
Purpose: By strengthening the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS) financial stability, the intervention intends to enhance service delivery.
Objectives: Goals include finding long-term funding sources for DCFS activities, saving costs, and working with other businesses and government groups to get funding.
Application of Research or Theoretical Perspective Guiding the Intervention Proposed
It is essential to align human services intervention strategies with theoretical viewpoints and research findings. This improves programs’ effectiveness and impact by fortifying them with solid concepts and factual evidence.
Safe Housing and Emergency Shelter Program
The Safe Housing and Emergency Shelter Program was created following the Housing First approach. This choice is supported by research, including a systematic review and meta-analysis by Baxter, Tweed, Katikireddi, and Thomson (2019). In randomized controlled studies, the effects of Housing First strategies on the health and well-being of homeless or at-risk people were examined. The initial step of providing secure and stable Housing has consistently increased health and well-being.
The Housing First approach, which puts safety and shelter first to reduce homelessness, is supported by this research. This approach lessens the financial burden on communities by lowering the costs of emergency services, hospitalization, and law enforcement for homeless persons (Fowler et al.,2018).
Intensive In-Home Services for Intact Families
The foundation of Intensive In-Home Services for Intact Families is Family Systems Theory. This point of view acknowledges the interconnectedness of families and the significant influence that family dynamics have on people’s behaviors. Malik (2020) explains how the Family Systems Theory takes a holistic approach to family issues. The idea is that strengthening the family structure could be beneficial to people. According to studies, treatments based on the Family Systems Theory have consistently improved family functioning. By addressing the root causes of family dysfunction and providing therapy, education, and support, this strategy adheres to Family Systems Theory (Malik, 2020).
Strengthening Financial Resources for DCFS
Using Resource Mobilization Theory as a foundation, DCFS is strengthening its financial resources. DCFS and other government agencies must effectively acquire and manage resources. The history and concepts of resource mobilization for development financing are explained by Volberding & Volberding (2021).
According to research, resource mobilization strategies may increase organizations’ and governments’ financial viability, enabling them to provide better client services. The intervention’s objectives of sustainable financing, cost-cutting, and financial partnerships with outside organisations and governmental entities are supported by this strategy (Volberding & Volberding, 2021).
Correcting the Problem from Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Perspectives
At the micro level, Safe Housing, Intervention 1: The acute needs of families and homeless individuals are met by this intervention. It manages each situation separately by offering safe and stable Housing. It offers rapid assistance and a secure environment for homeless persons to stabilize their lives. The course aids homeless individuals and families in overcoming adversity on a micro level.
Intensive In-Home Services for Intact Families as a 2nd Intervention: Families in tough situations get intensive in-home care thanks to this intermediary intervention. Its primary goal is to strengthen family ties. In order to strengthen bonds among families and promote healthy relationships, the intervention targets family issues and offers therapy, information, and support. At the mezzo level, family structures and connections are the focus. It assists families and children by preventing problems from becoming worse.
The macroeconomic and financial stability of the Department of Child and Family Services is the focus of the third intervention, Financial Resources for DCFS. This intervention addresses structural issues that limit the agency’s capacity to provide customer service. The company hopes to enhance resource distribution and service delivery by strengthening its finances. All DCFS clients and families gain when system sustainability and efficiency are prioritized at the macro level. This solution considers immediate client needs while preparing the systemic changes.
Financing For Interventions
Any project for human services requires reliable funding to be successful (Jaramillo et al., 2019). Government grants, individual gifts, and partnerships with regional housing providers, social service providers, and nonprofit groups provide funding.
However, financing human services projects may be challenging and complex (Jaramillo et al., 2019). Due to competition for a limited amount of grant money, grant bids must be strategic and well-prepared. Additionally, private donors often want evidence of the program’s effectiveness and social value (Jaramillo et al., 2019). This calls for compelling evidence of project outcomes and advantages.
A sound business plan is necessary to maintain financing (Jaramillo et al., 2019). Goals, approaches, outcomes, finances, and program sustainability should all be specified in this plan. Good business strategies attract funders and provide efficient resource management for the duration of the program.
Plan for Implementation: Timelines, Phases, and Projected Outcomes
Timeline for Implementation: The program development will span 12 months, divided into three phases: Planning (3 months), Implementation (6 months), and Evaluation (3 months). This timeline allows for careful planning and monitoring of progress. This timeline makes it possible to plan carefully and monitor development.
Results Projected:
• At least 80% of participants in the Safe Housing and Emergency Shelter Program are expected to transition from homelessness to secure, long-term housing.
• For Intensive In-Home Services for Intact Families, 70% of families are expected to function better and reduce the likelihood of child removal.
• Within 18 months, the Department of Child and Family Services must increase funding from various sources by 10% to enhance resource distribution and service delivery.
Conclusion
Though challenging, creating effective human services program interventions is crucial. It requires a strong theoretical foundation, a multi-level perspective, sustainable financing channels, and an organized execution approach. Human services programs may benefit their communities by planning implementation thoroughly, obtaining sufficient funding, addressing problems on several levels, and aligning treatments with research and theoretical viewpoints.
References
Baxter, A. J., Tweed, E. J., Katikireddi, S. V., & Thomson, H. (2019). Effects of Housing First approaches on health and well-being of adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Epidemiol Community Health, 73(5), 379-387.
Fowler, P. J., Brown, D. S., Schoeny, M., & Chung, S. (2018). Homelessness in the child welfare system: A randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of housing subsidies on foster care placements and costs. Child abuse & neglect, 83, 52-61.
Jaramillo, E. T., Willging, C. E., Green, A. E., Gunderson, L. M., Fettes, D. L., & Aarons, G. A. (2019). Creative Financing: Funding evidence-based interventions in human service systems. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 46, 366-383.
Malik, N. (2020). Family systems theory. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 855-856). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Volberding, P., & Volberding, P. (2021). 1950–1970: The World Bank, DFCs, and the Foundations of Private Investment Mobilization. Leveraging Financial Markets for Development: How KfW Revolutionized Development Finance, 37-76.