Instruction *Make #1 and #2 into separate word documents* #1.- READ the Ethical

Instruction *Make #1 and #2 into separate word documents* #1.- READ the Ethical Considerations feature found in the textbook at p. 148. RESPOND to the follow questions: Do you think, under the circumstances, that it is ethical to refuse the documents based on a minor technicality? Why or why not? Explain your response. The initial response should be no less than 250 words in length. document#2.- READ the case excerpt of El Al israel Airlines, Ltd., v. Tseng in the textbook at pp. 151-152. RESPOND to the follow questions: 1. Why was Tseng not able to pursue a remedy under New York law? 2. What policy reasons does the Court give for holding that the air liability convention should preclude remedies under local or state law? 3. Why would Tseng not be successful in an action against the airline in federal court under the convention? Be thorough but concise. You can write a single, extended response or break down each question separately — I am interested in content not form. Your response should be no more than 350 words in length. While there is no minimum length requirement, I expect you to make a direct response to each question and also include a concise explanation of your response.