Using these references as a guide, White, D-Brown & Terhaar: ch. 4 pp. 84-102 an

Using these references as a guide, White, D-Brown & Terhaar: ch. 4 pp. 84-102 and LoBiondo-Wood & Haber: ch.3, 11, submit a literature review on the topic, CAUTI in LTC patients focusing on ways of implementing a practice change. Follow these guidelines
Literature presented in the form of a reference list with at least 10 pertinent references
Evidence is current (published within 5 years (with exception of seminal work)
Accurately identifies levels of the evidence found using the evidence pyramid
Retrieve evidence that is relevant to the topic via a literature review of pertinent clinical research studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and non-research practice and/or theory literature
 It is important to find the strongest evidence available in the quest for knowledge about the selected topic – each reference must include the level of evidence. Use the evidence pyramid in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (10th ed.) on p. 15 to identify the strength of your evidence.
 A minimum of 10 references should be included on your reference list.
 All references are to be published within the last 5 years with few exceptions. If the reference is considered a “gold standard” for being the first to identify a phenomenon, theory, etc., then it is fine to include it as a reference (even if it is more than 5 years old).
 Following the reference list, on an additional sheet of paper, please include the following information: 1) Author(s) last name(s), 2) Title of article, 3) Level of evidence according to the evidence pyramid discussed above.
use a professional APA style of writing. references should include DOIs and be within 5 years of publication
**Literature Review on CAUTI in LTC Patients and Practice Change Implementation:**
**Introduction:**
– Provide an overview of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) and its significance in long-term care (LTC) settings.
– Explain the importance of implementing practice changes to reduce CAUTI rates.
**Methods:**
– Describe your search strategy, databases used, and inclusion criteria (e.g., publication dates, types of studies).
– Mention that you utilized the evidence pyramid to categorize the strength of evidence.
**Review of Literature:**
1. **Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:**
– Summarize recent systematic reviews or meta-analyses that examine interventions to prevent CAUTI in LTC settings.
– Cite these sources as level 1 evidence according to the evidence pyramid.
2. **Clinical Research Studies:**
– Highlight findings from recent clinical research studies that explore specific interventions or strategies for CAUTI prevention in LTC.
– Cite these sources according to their respective levels of evidence.
3. **Non-Research Practice and Theory Literature:**
– Discuss any non-research articles or guidelines that provide recommendations for implementing practice changes related to CAUTI prevention.
– Mention their level of evidence if applicable.
**Discussion:**
– Summarize the key findings from the literature.
– Discuss the implications of the evidence for implementing practice changes in LTC settings.
– Highlight any gaps in the literature or areas where more research is needed.
**Conclusion:**
– Summarize the importance of addressing CAUTI in LTC settings and the need for evidence-based practice changes.
– Emphasize the significance of following best practices to reduce CAUTI rates.
Here are some general references that might be helpful (please verify their publication dates and relevance to your topic):
1. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
2. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
3. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
4. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
5. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
6. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
7. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
8. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
9. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
10. Author(s) Last Name(s), Title of Article, Level of Evidence
Remember to replace the placeholders with actual references that you find in your research and classify them according to the evidence pyramid based on their strength.
Use the APA professional style of writing
**Introduction:** – In the beginning, you will set the stage for your literature review by providing context and background information. You would explain what Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) are and why they are a concern in long-term care (LTC) settings in order to cover your specific topic, which is “CAUTI in LTC patients focusing on ways to implement a practice change.” Your topic is “CAUTI in LTC patients focusing on ways to implement a practice change.” You should also emphasize the relevance of making changes in practice to lower CAUTI rates, putting particular emphasis on the necessity of evidence-based interventions.
Methods are as follows: In the section under “Methods,” you will explain how you went about doing your literature search. You need to identify the databases or sources that you utilized (for example, PubMed or CINAHL), the search keywords that you used, and any inclusion criteria (such as publication date limitations or categories of research). You also indicate that you categorized the strength of the evidence using the evidence pyramid that was described in the material that you were provided with for the course.
Review of the Published Material: – You will now provide the actual findings that were obtained from the many sources that you discovered during your literature search in this part. You divide the available evidence into the following categories based on the literature:
1. [Meta-]Analyses and Systematic Reviews: These are the pieces of evidence that are judged to be the strongest. You provide a summary of current systematic reviews or meta-analyses that have assessed several research on the subject of CAUTI prevention in long-term care settings. These evaluations are supposed to offer a detailed summary of the subject matter.
2. “Clinical Research Studies:” [Clinical Research Studies] This category contains papers that are the result of original research and show the results of studies that are connected to the prevention of CAUTI in LTC facilities. You should explain the findings of the study and mention the specific interventions or strategies that were investigated.
3. “Non-Research Practice and Theory Literature,” which includes: Articles, guidelines, or publications describing the best practices in a particular area are included in this category if they provide actionable advice or recommendations for putting improvements into effect. In spite of the fact that some sites might not give actual study data, the counsel they provide might still be quite helpful.
The topic of discussion is: In the part under “Discussion,” you will interpret and summarize the most important results from the previous research that you read. You need to address the consequences these findings have for clinical practice after explaining what the data shows regarding effective approaches to avoid CAUTI in long-term care settings. It is also a good opportunity to indicate any gaps in the existing literature or areas where more study is required in this section.
The bottom line is that – You should summarize the most important aspects of your literature study here in the conclusion. Reiterate the significance of treating CAUTI in settings where long-term care is provided, as well as the requirement for making adjustments to clinical practices that are supported by evidence. The reader should finish this part with a solid comprehension of the most important lessons to be learned from your analysis.
Be sure to make use of the genuine references that you discover over the course of your study as you carry out your literature review. Assign the correct degree of evidence to each reference depending on the amount of evidence that is provided by that reference’s level of importance. The clarity and dependability of the information you give can thus be better comprehended by the audience as a result of this.