Below, you’ll find two examples from two different annotated bibliographies. For

Below, you’ll find two examples from two different annotated bibliographies. For this assignment, write a brief (150- to 250-word) response to the following questions:
Both examples discuss texts in very different disciplines, but both provide some similar information about those texts. In addition to bibliographic information (author, title, etc.), what kinds of things are both entries telling you about their respective texts?
What are some ways that the two entries differ? Does one entry contain information that the other entry does not? Does either entry contain errors that would affect your ability to work with that source?
If you were working on a project in either discipline, which entry might you find more useful? Is there anything that entry does well that you might try to replicate in your own annotated bibliography for this project?
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ENTRY EXAMPLE #1McClement, Mike. “Are You Born with Self-Confidence?” Increase your Self-Confidence. Pearson Education Limited, 2015.
In this chapter of McClement’s book, he addresses one of the major misconceptions about self-confidence. Many people believe that confidence is something that you are born with, or it is something that you inherit. The truth is that when we are born, we all start at the same point on the path to earning self-confidence. McClement calls self-confidence a skill, meaning that it can be developed. Later in the chapter, McClement corrects common misconceptions on the topic and provides tips that can help build self-confidence. For example, many believe that you must be good-looking to be confident, but the truth is that looks only impact you if you let them. Finally, McClement describes how we can move past a lack of self-confidence. He simply states that we need to be more positive. We need to view problems and scary situations as challenges that need to be solved rather than be avoided.
This article will be very useful, primarily because it argues that self-confidence is not something you are born with, or inherited, rather it is something that needs to be developed and worked on over time. It also discusses several misconceptions about self-confidence, so it can be used to address any possible counter claims. This source is also useful because of the reliability of its author. McClement has over 25 years of experience in the fields of self-improvement and personal development, and he has many published books on a variety of topics, many of them involving confidence.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ENTRY EXAMPLE #2cloning of a human
by Charles Q. Choi
(Scientific American.) Jun2010, vol. 302 Issue 6, page 36-38
In “Cloning of a Human,” it talks about the future possibility of cloning humans, the science behind it, and the moral and ethical viewpoint of it all. Cloning is somewhat of a new topic that, other than Dolly the sheep, hasn’t been practiced a lot. Although the risk of cloning in general is high, it is higher for humans because it takes more chromosomes to align in the human body and it is just overall more difficult. The ethical and moral stand points people think either pro for it or against it for reasonable reasons. Some think that if you discover something you are very good at later in life that could possibly take your life in a different direction, if you clone yourself, you can tell your 5-year-old self to really put time into that specific thing. Others think that not one man has should interfere with people’s lives and the possibility of cloning without knowing. A lot goes into this tough topic because it is a big deal and would change so much for future generations.
I think the author did a good job defending her points that she made, but they were pretty brief. I think that is because it wasn’t that long of an article, but I wish there would have been more information on the effects because that caught my attention.