Below are the topics of each Lab simulation completed for this discussion post.
Labster Microbiology Simulation:
Pipetting: Selecting and Using Micropipettes
Pipetting: Master the technique
Bacterial Cell Structures: An introduction to the bacterial cell
After completing the Labster simulations and virtual lab reports for this week’s assignments, discuss the following:
What was your biggest “take away” from any/all of the simulations?
What did you find most challenging from the simulations?
How is what you learned from the assignments applicable to the medical field?
Give examples of how such knowledge can affect your direct patient care.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
Discussion Rubric
Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts
5 to >4.0 pts
Distinguished
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
4 to >3.0 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.
3 to >0.0 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.
0 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. Or nothing was posted.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
3 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
2 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
1 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
0 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was posted.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer Responses
2 pts
Distinguished
Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.
1 pts
Fair
Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.
0 pts
Poor
Provided no response to a peer’s post.
2 pts
Total Points: 10
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount