In this assignment, students are expected to analyze their performance on the in

In this assignment, students are expected to analyze their performance on the integrated comprehensive assessments and reflect on areas of opportunity and strategies to promote NCLEX-RN® success and transition into practice. You will apply the priority concept (topic) to evidence-based professional practice upon which nurses have the ability to resolve or have a positive impact. There is a focus on the healthcare disparities of the individual, as well as ethical and legal implications to professional practice. You will discuss how an interdisciplinary approach promotes quality improvement for the patient and evidence-based professional practice, driving positive outcomes.
Download the Capstone Evidence-Based Practice Paper guidelinesLinks to an external site. and compare your work to the expectations.
Submit the assignment by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (MT), unless your instructor indicates otherwise.
Rubric
RUA: Evidence-Based Practice Paper
RUA: Evidence-Based Practice Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
1. Offer a detailed descriiption of the purpose statement for the paper.
2. Identify the priority concept (topic) from the Individual Student Comprehensive Assessment Trends: Longitudinal Performance Table drawn from one (1) of the four (4) main categories of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint:
– Assurance of a safe and effective care environment
– Health promotion and maintenance of health
– Preservation of the patient population’s psychosocial integrity
– Preservation of the patient population’s physiological integrity
3. Provide a detailed descriiption of the relationship between the category from the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint and the priority concept (topic).
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 3 requirements for section.
16 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImportance
1. Describe the importance of the priority concept (topic) to professional practice.
2. Describe the importance of the priority concept (topic) to the health status of a patient population.
3. Include the potential negative effect(s) to professional practice if the priority concept (topic) is unresolved.
4. Include the potential negative effect(s) to the patient population if the priority concept (topic) is unresolved.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 4 requirements for section.
18 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.
16 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHealthcare Disparities, Inequalities, and Interventions
1. Identify patient populations that may be negatively influenced by the priority concept (topic) if unresolved.
2. Identify healthcare resources to support evidence-based practice related to the priority concept (topic).
3. Summarize potential priority concept (topic) healthcare disparities and inequalities related to diverse populations.
4. Propose an evidence-based solution for the priority concept (topic) related to healthcare disparities.
5. Identify three (3) evidence-based practice interventions.
6. Prioritize the identified evidence-based practice interventions and provide rationale.
7. Discuss two (2) patient education considerations related to the priority concept (topic).
70 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 7 requirements for section.
63 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 5-6 requirements for section.
54 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3-4 requirements for section.
21 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1-2 requirements for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
70 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLegal & Ethical Considerations and Intervention Challenges
1. Identify at least one (1) ethical and one (1) legal implication for addressing the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
2. Discuss at least one (1) strategy in prevention of an ethical dilemma related to the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
3. Discuss at least one (1) strategy in prevention of legal consequences related to the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
4. Identify one (1) anticipated challenge to the success of preventing the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
5. Identify one (1) anticipated challenge to the success of resolving the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
40 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 5 requirements for section.
36 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.
31 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.
12 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1-2 requirements for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipants and Interdisciplinary Approach
1. Identify all the parties who will be involved in the implementation of the priority concept (topic) interventions.
2. Discuss the role of each member in the intervention implementation for the priority concept (topic).
3. Identify a minimum of two (2) members of a discipline outside of nursing.
4. Discuss the benefit of including the identified interdisciplinary member from disciplines outside nursing to promote evidence-based professional practice.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 4 requirements for section.
18 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.
16 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality Improvement
1. Provide at least one (1) benefit in patient outcomes from addressing the priority concept (topic) within the clinical environment.
2. Provide at least one (1) benefit to the nursing profession that will result from addressing this priority concept (topic) in clinical professional practice.
3. Discuss at least one (1) resource utilized to promote improved patient outcomes in the clinical environment.
4. Discuss at least one (1) resource utilized to increase professional nurse knowledge promoting improved clinical professional practice.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 4 requirements for section.
18 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.
16 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
1. Provide a thorough recap of the purpose to promote increased evidence-based professional practice knowledge related to the priority concept (topic) deficiency.
2. Summarize resources identified to support improved evidence-based professional practice related to the priority concept (topic).
3. Include a complete statement describing why addressing the priority concept (topic) matters for patient outcomes and evidence-based professional practice.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 3 requirements for section.
16 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format, Grammar, and Punctuation
1. References are submitted with paper.
2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors.
3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.
4. At least three (3) scholarly, peer reviewed, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided. Each section should have a cited source to support information provided.
5. Length is 4-6 pages, excluding title and reference pages.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes all 5 requirements for section.
18 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.
16 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1-2 requirements for section.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
Total Points: 230