PLEASE, TAKE THIS ORDER ONLY IF YOU HAVE DEEP KNOWLEDGE OF LAW, THANK YOU! Criti

PLEASE, TAKE THIS ORDER ONLY IF YOU HAVE DEEP KNOWLEDGE OF LAW, THANK YOU!
Critically examine the suitability of natural and economic law justifications for
intellectual property law.
please do not be too descriptive and go straight to the point in answering this essay question without spending word count on unnecessary background information that does not help in answering the question. critically examine the natural and economical justification for intellectual property law and evaluate their debates , problems, objectives and make arguments then critically examine their suitability for intellectual property law. use cases, articles and journals to defend your point,
sources you might need
Bently, Sherman, Gangjee and Johnson 35-57, 397-423, 847-864
Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539.
· Wagamama v City Centre Restaurants [1995] FSR 713.
· USA: Diamond v Chakrabarty (1980) 447 US 303.
Justin Hughes, ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’ (1988) 77 Georgetown Law Journal 287, 331-339.
William Fisher, ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Munzer (ed), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001).
More generally, see Peter Drahos, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Ashgate 1996), and William Landes and Richard Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (any edition).