Answer this prompt based on the notes provided as an attachment. The purpose of

Answer this prompt based on the notes provided as an attachment.
The purpose of this activity is to appraise the role of nursing in creating a safe patient environment through nursing led interventions. As the largest health system workforce in the world, nurses are the single most significant contributors to patient safety and outcomes. Literature suggests that quality of care depends to a large degree on nurses (Kane et al., 2007; Lacey and Cox, 2009; Landon et al., 2006; Sales et al., 2008). The Joint Commission, the leading independent accrediting body for health care organizations, believes that “the future state of nursing is inextricably linked to the strides in patient care quality and safety that are critical to the success of America’s health care system, today and tomorrow” (Joint Commission, 2010). While quality measures have historically focused on conditions or diseases, many of the quality measures used over the past 20+ years address how well nurses are able to do their jobs.
The role of the professional nurse has many facets. This activity will provide the opportunity for you to appraise a patient safety concern and the role of the nurse as a leader in creating change.
This activity directly supports course objectives 2, 3, and 8 in the syllabus and following AACN essentials for a prelicensure nursing Degree:
2 Apply theory and research-based knowledge from nursing, the arts, humanities, and other sciences.2a Apply or employ knowledge form nursing science as well as the natural, physical, and social sciences to build an understanding of the human experience and nursing practice.
2d Examine influence of personal values in decision making for nursing practice.
2 Integrate best evidence into nursing practice.2a Evaluate clinical practice to generate questions to improve nursing care.
1 Apply quality improvement principles in care delivery.1a Recognize nursing’s essential role in improving healthcare quality and safety.
1f Identify strategies to improve outcomes of patient care in practice.
2 Contribute to a culture of patient safety.2c Examine basic design principles to reduce risk of error.
2 Perform effectively in different team roles, using principles and values of team dynamics.2a Apply principles of team dynamics, including team roles, to facilitate effective team functioning.
2d Recognize how one’s uniqueness (as a person and a nurse) contributes to effective interprofessional working relationships.
2e Apply principles of team leadership and management performance to improve quality and assure safety.
2f Evaluate performance of individual and team to improve quality and promote safety.
3 Use knowledge of nursing and other professions to address healthcare needs3b Leverage roles and abilities of team members to optimize care.
4 Work with other professions to maintain a climate of mutual learning, respect, and shared values4dDemonstrate respect for the perspectives and experience of other professions.
3 Optimize system effectiveness through application of innovation and evidence-based practice.3b Use reported performance metrics to compare/monitor outcomes.
2 Employ participatory approach to nursing care.2g Communicate in a professional manner.
3 Demonstrate accountability to the individual, society, and the profession.3a Engage in advocacy that promotes the best interest of the individual, community, and profession.
4 Comply with relevant laws, policies, and regulations.4a Advocate for policies that promote health and prevent harm.
3 Develop capacity for leadership.3a Compare and contrast leadership principles and theories.
This activity will also build foundational knowledge and ability in the role of “nurses serving as change agents in creating systems that bridge the delivery of health care” (The Future of Nursing 2020 – 20230).The knowledge gained through this activity will translate to your professional careers and active participation in the profession of nursing as leaders in improving the health of the communities we serve at all levels. SkillsThe purpose of this assignment is to help you practice the following skills that are essential to your success in this course and in your professional life beyond school:Identify key points of resistance and recommend strategies to manage resistance to change incorporating Lewin’s change theory or Burrowes and Needs (2009) Stages of Change model.
Appraise driving and restraining forces for change
Apply rational–empirical, normative–reeducative, and power–coercive strategies for effecting change.
Identify the strengths of an interprofessional team and incorporate key stakeholders in a planned change.
Ensure each objective features a measurable action students will perform that can be observed and evaluated through the completion of this assignment. KnowledgeThis assignment will also help you to become familiar with the following important content knowledge in this discipline:Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice
Role of Nursing in Patient quality and Safety
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Leadership
Person Centered Care
Interprofessional partnerships / collaboration
Teamwork
Evidence-Based Practice
Data driven change management
Criteria for SuccessA successful submission will include components of reflection on the reading and activity. This means reading for understanding prior to the activity and a true reflection of the activity after the simulation scenario and debriefing has concluded. Your appraisal assignment should also show critical thinking and recommendations based on current evidence and theories related to change management. Using specific examples of what was observed in the simulation activity is highly recommended. Students are also highly recommended to review the provided rubric and ask questions regarding the assignment prior to the due date. Use of office hours, the campus writing center, or an app such as Grammarly is very much encouraged. APA must be 7th edition professional paper.This assignment is 5% of your total grade. Missing class on the date of this activity will result in a zero in this assignment.
Identify key points of resistance in the scenario using specific observed behaviors and recommend strategies to manage resistance to change incorporating Lewin’s change theory or Burrowes and Needs (2009) Stages of Change model.
Sensing continued resistance by staff nurses what strategies could you employ to foster refreezing of the new system? Use evidence to support your answer.
Apply rational–empirical, normative–reeducative, or power–coercive strategies as an alternative for change. Use evidence to support your rational.
Based on the role of the committee members, Identify any key stakeholders that may have been absent and why the committee would have benefitted from their participation.
Follow the rubric below
CriterionExcellent 5 pointsAverage 4 pointsFair 3 pointsPoor (0*-2 points)
1. Identify key points of resistance in the scenario and suggest specific and recommend strategies to manage resistance to change incorporating Lewin’s change theory or Burrowes and Needs (2009) Stages of Change model.A minimum of 4 key resistance points are discussed. Ideas are well developed and demonstrate a high degree of logic, reasoning and critical thinking that clearly leads the reader to the conclusion.A minimum of 4 key resistance points are discussed. Ideas are well developed and logically organized with transitions used between ideas to create coherence. Critical thinking is weaved into key points.A minimum of 4 key resistance points are present with limited detail and supporting evidence. Ideas are logically organized with some critical thinking present. Some points are misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout.A minimum of 4 key resistance points are discussed. Writing lacks logical organization. Ideas lack detail, development, unity and are poorly supported by evidence. Minimal critical thinking demonstrated.
2. Sensing continued resistance by staff nurses, what strategies could you employ to foster refreezing of the new system? Use evidence to support your answer.A minimum of 3 strategies are suggested with strong supporting evidence for each. Strategies are clearly explained and demonstrate a high degree of logic, reasoning, and critical thinking in their application.A minimum of 3 strategies are suggested with some supporting evidence for each. Strategies are explained in a coherent manner that demonstrates logic, reasoning, and critical thinking in their application.A minimum of 3 strategies are suggested with limited detail and supporting evidence. Strategies are logical with evidence of critical thinking, but some points are misplaced and unconnected. Transitions evident but not used throughout.A minimum of 3 strategies are suggested. Writing lacks organization. Strategies lack logic, detail, and/or supporting evidence. Minimal critical thinking demonstrated.
3. Apply rational–empirical, normative–reeducative, or power–coercive strategies as an alternative for change. Provide evidence to support your rationale.Ideas are well developed, supported by evidence, and demonstrate a high degree of logic, reasoning and critical thinking that clearly leads the reader to the conclusion.Ideas are well developed and logically organized and supported by evidence with transitions used between ideas to create coherence. Critical thinking is weaved into key points.Ideas are logically organized with limited supporting evidence and critical thinking present. Some points are misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout.Ideas lack detail, development, unity and are poorly supported by evidence. Minimal critical thinking demonstrated.
4. Based on the role of the committee members, suggest other key stakeholders that may have been absent and discuss how their participation would have benefited the committee’s work.Suggestions for other key stakeholders are logical and practical. Their potential contribution to the committee’s work is clearly identified, supported by evidence, and demonstrates innovation of thinking. Writing demonstrates a high degree of reasoning and critical thinking.Suggestions for other key stakeholders are logical and practical. Their potential contribution to the committee’s work is identified and supported by evidence. Writing demonstrates reasoning with critical thinking weaved throughout.Suggestions for other key stakeholders are organized but may be impractical. Their potential contribution to the committee’s work is not completely clear with minimal supporting evidence. Some points are misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout.Suggestions for other stakeholders lack logic. Their potential contribution to the committee is unclear and is poorly supported by evidence. Minimal critical thinking demonstrated.
CriterionExcellent 5 pointsAverage 4 pointsFair 3 pointsPoor (0*-2 points)
Grammar & MechanicsEssay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons.Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though essay. Some errors remain.Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent.
FormatFollows Professional Paper APAFormatting for Title Page, Margins, Header, In-Text Citation, & References with minimum or no formatting errors.Follows Professional Paper APAFormatting for Title Page, Margins, Header, In-Text Citation, & References with errors in two areas.Follows Professional Paper APAFormatting for Title Page, Margins, Header, In-Text Citation, & References with errors in three or more areas.Fails to follow Professional Paper APAFormatting for Title Page, Margins, Header, In-Text Citation, & References.