Attached is a peer review.
Team Project (Strengthening the Plan for Advocacy – A Peer Review)
Purpose: When DNP Projects occur in small settings (or over a short period of time), there is often concern that the practice change is “not enough” for doctoral work. Advocating for best practices by offering tools is a way to scale the DNP Project and impact policy.
Bradshaw, M. J., & Vitale, T. R. (2020). The DNP project workbook the DNP project workbook: A step-by-step process for success. Springer Publishing.
Directions:
1. First, review the major components of your DNP peer’s project.
2. As a peer review, identify and discuss at least three opportunities to expand the project in the area of “advocacy” resources related to the peer’s DNP Project.
3. Submit suggestions (as a written proposal) for your DNP peer’s project in at least 3 of the following areas below:
A national engagement activity
Connecting with a local legislator’s office (related to the DNP Project)
Identify a state-level policy
A local health fair
A local advocacy activity
A national policy
Locate additional tools and resources (links, online resources, patient/provider education tools) to support the peer’s DNP Project
Any other area that your classmate proposes to support advocacy
Example: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). Health literacy universal precautions toolkit (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/quality-resources/tools/literacy-toolkit/healthlittoolkit2.htmlLinks to an external site.
If selecting a resource such as the one above, provide clear insight and suggestions for why this resource will support the sustainability of the peer’s DNP Project.
4. The written proposal should be at least 2 pages. APA 7th Edition. At least three references.
5. Upload the assignment – Week 7
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount