In this assessment, you are required to critique a systematic literature review using short answer questions adapted from the JBI Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses (JBI 2020). You will also use GenAI to generate an initial critique of the systematic review, which you will then evaluate for accuracy.
Your task is to critique the systematic review using the adapted questions from the JBI checklist and provide a review of the GenAI-generated critique. Whether GenAI’s responses contain errors or not, you must demonstrate a clear understanding of the systematic review and provide evidence-based answers to the questions that are supported by further reading (references).
Steps for Completing the Assessment:
Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review
Access the Article: Download the systematic review article provided on the Canvas site under “Assignments
Familiarise yourself: Carefully read and understand the article, focusing on key elements such as the research question, inclusion criteria, search strategy, sources of information, critical appraisal, data extraction, methods, publication bias and recommendations.
You will need a strong understanding of the review publication in order to critique it thoroughly using the questions adapted from the JBI Checklist.
Step 2: Understand the questions adapted from the JBI Checklist:
Download the Assessment Template: Access and download the assessment template provided on Canvas. Review the short answer questions that you will need to answer.
Review the JBI Checklist: If there are any questions from the template that you do not understand, refer to the explanations provided in the JBI Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses (JBI 2020; provided below in CANVAS). This will help you interpret and apply the checklist questions accurately to the systematic review.
Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique
Access GenAI: Log into the GenAI platform and upload your chosen systematic review.
Ask GenAI to Answer the JBI Questions: Use specific prompts to ask GenAI to generate responses to each question from the JBI Checklist. For example, you can ask:
“Critique the research question in this systematic review .”
“Evaluate the inclusion criteria .”
“Does this review assess publication bias?”
Save the Output: Copy and paste the GenAI-generated responses for each question into the assessment template word document (found below) for Step 1. These will form the first part of your submission.
Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Short Answer Questions
For each short answer question adapted from the JBI Checklist, critically assess the systematic review GenAI. This step will form the core of your assignment, demonstrating your understanding of the review and the JBI framework.
Your responses should address the 12 questions adapted from the JBI Checklist listed below:
Review Question and Objectives
Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated?
What is the purpose, objective, and/or question of the systematic review?
Inclusion Criteria
What is the inclusion criteria for this review?
Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? Explain why or why not.
Search Strategy
Is a clear search strategy provided?
Is the search strategy appropriate? Explain why or why not.
Sources and Resources for Article Search
What sources and resources were used to search for articles?
Are the sources and resources adequate? Explain why or why not.
Criteria for Appraising Studies
What was the criteria for appraising studies?
Was this criteria appropriate? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Independent Critical Appraisal
Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently?
Explain why it is important to have two or more reviewers.
Data Extraction Methods
How was the data extracted?
What methods were used to minimize errors in data extraction? Are these methods appropriate? Explain.
Methods for Combining Studies
Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Assessment of Publication Bias
Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?
Provide a rationale for your answer.
Support for Recommendations
Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data?
Explain how the data supports the recommendations.
Directives for New Research
Were specific directives for new research identified?
Are these appropriate? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Application of Findings to Clinical Practice
Based on your appraisal of this review, would you apply the findings to your clinical practice?
Explain why or why not.
Step 5: Compare and Report Findings: Finally, compare GenAI’s critique to your own. Identify any differences, errors, inaccuracies, or irregularities between the two critiques, noting specific points where GenAI’s response may have missed details, misunderstood context, or provided inaccurate assessments based on the checklist criteria.
For each question:
If GenAI provides incorrect or incomplete responses: Identify the errors, explain why they are incorrect, and provide the correct information based on the systematic review.
If GenAI’s answers are correct: Provide a justification explaining why the response is accurate, supported by evidence from the review.
Submission:
Use the assessment template (word doc) provided on Canvas to provide your responses. Your submission should include the following:
GenAI Output:
Paste the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI in response to each of the JBI checklist questions.
Your Critique
For each JBI checklist question, provide your detailed review and critique along with page numbers from the publication.
Compare and Report Findings If errors were found: Identify the errors, explain why they are incorrect, and provide the corrected information with evidence from the systematic review.
If no errors were found: Justify why GenAI’s response is accurate, Support Your Analysis with Evidence: Each of your short answer responses must be backed by evidence from the systematic review.
4. References
Cite and reference the systematic review and any other sources using APA 7th edition
*The assessment template should be used to complete this assessment and is found below.
Systematic review 2 (Mental Health Nursing):
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00311-5
Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!
In order to effectively complete your assessment, let’s break it down step by step, focusing on critiquing the systematic review based on the JBI Checklist and incorporating the use of GenAI for generating an initial critique.
Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review
You need to download and thoroughly read the systematic review titled:
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75.
While reading the article, focus on the following sections:
- Research Question
- Inclusion Criteria
- Search Strategy
- Sources of Information
- Methods
- Critical Appraisal
- Data Extraction Methods
- Publication Bias Assessment
- Recommendations
Make note of any key details that will help answer the questions in the JBI Checklist.
Step 2: Understand the JBI Checklist Questions
The questions adapted from the JBI Checklist will guide your critique of the systematic review. Here are the key areas to focus on:
1. Review Question and Objectives:
- Does the systematic review clearly state its research question and objectives? Is the question relevant and focused?
2. Inclusion Criteria:
- What are the inclusion criteria for the systematic review? Are these criteria suitable for answering the research question?
3. Search Strategy:
- Does the review provide a clear and comprehensive search strategy? Is the strategy adequate for identifying all relevant studies?
4. Sources and Resources for Article Search:
- Which sources did the authors use to find articles? Are these sources comprehensive and reliable?
5. Criteria for Appraising Studies:
- What criteria did the authors use to appraise the studies included in the review? Were these criteria appropriate?
6. Independent Critical Appraisal:
- Was critical appraisal conducted independently by more than one reviewer? Why is this important?
7. Data Extraction Methods:
- How was data extracted? Were methods used to minimize errors in data extraction, and are they appropriate?
8. Methods for Combining Studies:
- Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Did the authors provide a rationale for their methods?
9. Assessment of Publication Bias:
- Was publication bias assessed? If so, how? What is the rationale for assessing publication bias?
10. Support for Recommendations:
- Were the recommendations made by the authors supported by the data they reported?
11. Directives for New Research:
- Did the authors suggest areas for future research? Were these suggestions appropriate?
12. Application of Findings to Clinical Practice:
- Do the findings of this review have practical applications in clinical practice? Should these findings be applied in your clinical setting?
Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique
Once you have thoroughly read the systematic review, you can now use GenAI to generate responses for each question on the JBI Checklist.
For example:
- Prompt for GenAI: “Critique the research question in the systematic review by Heshmati et al. (2023). Does it clearly and explicitly state the purpose of the review?”
- Prompt for GenAI: “Evaluate the inclusion criteria used in the systematic review. Are they appropriate for the research question and objectives?”
After generating responses from GenAI, paste them into the assessment template.
Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Questions
For each question, you will:
- Review GenAI’s critique and compare it with your own analysis.
- Provide a detailed evaluation based on the content of the review and support your answers with evidence from the text.
For example:
- Question: “Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?”
- GenAI response: “Yes, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined, focusing on studies that examined the effects of parental leave on mental health.”
- Your critique: “The inclusion criteria are indeed appropriate as they focus on relevant studies that meet the research question. However, the exclusion criteria could have been more explicitly stated to ensure transparency. The focus on studies involving parents’ mental health after parental leave is relevant, but there is limited information on the diversity of the sample populations.”
Step 5: Compare and Report Findings
In this step, you’ll evaluate the differences between GenAI’s critique and your own analysis:
- If GenAI’s critique contains errors, provide a detailed explanation of why it is incorrect, and correct it with your findings from the systematic review.
- If GenAI’s critique is correct, justify why it is accurate and relevant to the research.
Submission Requirements:
- GenAI Output: Include the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI for each question.
- Your Critique: Provide your own analysis and comparison with GenAI’s critique for each question, using evidence from the systematic review.
- References: Cite the systematic review and any additional sources you use to support your critique using APA 7th edition format.
In order to effectively complete your assessment, let’s break it down step by step, focusing on critiquing the systematic review based on the JBI Checklist and incorporating the use of GenAI for generating an initial critique.
Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review
You need to download and thoroughly read the systematic review titled:
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75.
While reading the article, focus on the following sections:
- Research Question
- Inclusion Criteria
- Search Strategy
- Sources of Information
- Methods
- Critical Appraisal
- Data Extraction Methods
- Publication Bias Assessment
- Recommendations
Make note of any key details that will help answer the questions in the JBI Checklist.
Step 2: Understand the JBI Checklist Questions
The questions adapted from the JBI Checklist will guide your critique of the systematic review. Here are the key areas to focus on:
1. Review Question and Objectives:
- Does the systematic review clearly state its research question and objectives? Is the question relevant and focused?
2. Inclusion Criteria:
- What are the inclusion criteria for the systematic review? Are these criteria suitable for answering the research question?
3. Search Strategy:
- Does the review provide a clear and comprehensive search strategy? Is the strategy adequate for identifying all relevant studies?
4. Sources and Resources for Article Search:
- Which sources did the authors use to find articles? Are these sources comprehensive and reliable?
5. Criteria for Appraising Studies:
- What criteria did the authors use to appraise the studies included in the review? Were these criteria appropriate?
6. Independent Critical Appraisal:
- Was critical appraisal conducted independently by more than one reviewer? Why is this important?
7. Data Extraction Methods:
- How was data extracted? Were methods used to minimize errors in data extraction, and are they appropriate?
8. Methods for Combining Studies:
- Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Did the authors provide a rationale for their methods?
9. Assessment of Publication Bias:
- Was publication bias assessed? If so, how? What is the rationale for assessing publication bias?
10. Support for Recommendations:
- Were the recommendations made by the authors supported by the data they reported?
11. Directives for New Research:
- Did the authors suggest areas for future research? Were these suggestions appropriate?
12. Application of Findings to Clinical Practice:
- Do the findings of this review have practical applications in clinical practice? Should these findings be applied in your clinical setting?
Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique
Once you have thoroughly read the systematic review, you can now use GenAI to generate responses for each question on the JBI Checklist.
For example:
- Prompt for GenAI: “Critique the research question in the systematic review by Heshmati et al. (2023). Does it clearly and explicitly state the purpose of the review?”
- Prompt for GenAI: “Evaluate the inclusion criteria used in the systematic review. Are they appropriate for the research question and objectives?”
After generating responses from GenAI, paste them into the assessment template.
Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Questions
For each question, you will:
- Review GenAI’s critique and compare it with your own analysis.
- Provide a detailed evaluation based on the content of the review and support your answers with evidence from the text.
For example:
- Question: “Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?”
- GenAI response: “Yes, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined, focusing on studies that examined the effects of parental leave on mental health.”
- Your critique: “The inclusion criteria are indeed appropriate as they focus on relevant studies that meet the research question. However, the exclusion criteria could have been more explicitly stated to ensure transparency. The focus on studies involving parents’ mental health after parental leave is relevant, but there is limited information on the diversity of the sample populations.”
Step 5: Compare and Report Findings
In this step, you’ll evaluate the differences between GenAI’s critique and your own analysis:
- If GenAI’s critique contains errors, provide a detailed explanation of why it is incorrect, and correct it with your findings from the systematic review.
- If GenAI’s critique is correct, justify why it is accurate and relevant to the research.
Submission Requirements:
- GenAI Output: Include the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI for each question.
- Your Critique: Provide your own analysis and comparison with GenAI’s critique for each question, using evidence from the systematic review.
- References: Cite the systematic review and any additional sources you use to support your critique using APA 7th edition format.
In order to effectively complete your assessment, let’s break it down step by step, focusing on critiquing the systematic review based on the JBI Checklist and incorporating the use of GenAI for generating an initial critique.
Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review
You need to download and thoroughly read the systematic review titled:
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75.
While reading the article, focus on the following sections:
- Research Question
- Inclusion Criteria
- Search Strategy
- Sources of Information
- Methods
- Critical Appraisal
- Data Extraction Methods
- Publication Bias Assessment
- Recommendations
Make note of any key details that will help answer the questions in the JBI Checklist.
Step 2: Understand the JBI Checklist Questions
The questions adapted from the JBI Checklist will guide your critique of the systematic review. Here are the key areas to focus on:
1. Review Question and Objectives:
- Does the systematic review clearly state its research question and objectives? Is the question relevant and focused?
2. Inclusion Criteria:
- What are the inclusion criteria for the systematic review? Are these criteria suitable for answering the research question?
3. Search Strategy:
- Does the review provide a clear and comprehensive search strategy? Is the strategy adequate for identifying all relevant studies?
4. Sources and Resources for Article Search:
- Which sources did the authors use to find articles? Are these sources comprehensive and reliable?
5. Criteria for Appraising Studies:
- What criteria did the authors use to appraise the studies included in the review? Were these criteria appropriate?
6. Independent Critical Appraisal:
- Was critical appraisal conducted independently by more than one reviewer? Why is this important?
7. Data Extraction Methods:
- How was data extracted? Were methods used to minimize errors in data extraction, and are they appropriate?
8. Methods for Combining Studies:
- Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Did the authors provide a rationale for their methods?
9. Assessment of Publication Bias:
- Was publication bias assessed? If so, how? What is the rationale for assessing publication bias?
10. Support for Recommendations:
- Were the recommendations made by the authors supported by the data they reported?
11. Directives for New Research:
- Did the authors suggest areas for future research? Were these suggestions appropriate?
12. Application of Findings to Clinical Practice:
- Do the findings of this review have practical applications in clinical practice? Should these findings be applied in your clinical setting?
Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique
Once you have thoroughly read the systematic review, you can now use GenAI to generate responses for each question on the JBI Checklist.
For example:
- Prompt for GenAI: “Critique the research question in the systematic review by Heshmati et al. (2023). Does it clearly and explicitly state the purpose of the review?”
- Prompt for GenAI: “Evaluate the inclusion criteria used in the systematic review. Are they appropriate for the research question and objectives?”
After generating responses from GenAI, paste them into the assessment template.
Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Questions
For each question, you will:
- Review GenAI’s critique and compare it with your own analysis.
- Provide a detailed evaluation based on the content of the review and support your answers with evidence from the text.
For example:
- Question: “Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?”
- GenAI response: “Yes, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined, focusing on studies that examined the effects of parental leave on mental health.”
- Your critique: “The inclusion criteria are indeed appropriate as they focus on relevant studies that meet the research question. However, the exclusion criteria could have been more explicitly stated to ensure transparency. The focus on studies involving parents’ mental health after parental leave is relevant, but there is limited information on the diversity of the sample populations.”
Step 5: Compare and Report Findings
In this step, you’ll evaluate the differences between GenAI’s critique and your own analysis:
- If GenAI’s critique contains errors, provide a detailed explanation of why it is incorrect, and correct it with your findings from the systematic review.
- If GenAI’s critique is correct, justify why it is accurate and relevant to the research.
Submission Requirements:
- GenAI Output: Include the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI for each question.
- Your Critique: Provide your own analysis and comparison with GenAI’s critique for each question, using evidence from the systematic review.
- References: Cite the systematic review and any additional sources you use to support your critique using APA 7th edition format.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount