Please note that all articles for weekly discussions must be current scholarly

Please note that all articles for weekly discussions must be current scholarly articles that will assist you in your research. In addition, you will need to find at least two scholarly articles for this discussion to support your thoughts.
No books can be used, only current scholarly journals (past 5 to 7 years) that are labelled academic, peer-reviewed, or refereed journals. To receive credit for this discussion, all references must align with in-text citations and be complete with all information (i.e., authors, date, title, source) to include the DOI or the URL. This will help faculty retrieve the source to determine if the source meets the requirements of the submission. Each paragraph must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least 2 or more current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years). Review the rubric below.
Directions for this discussion which will be in TWO PARTS:
For this discussion, you will place the heading of Part 1 and Part 2 separately so your faculty member and colleagues can easily follow your content.
For this discussion, you will conduct research regarding three statements (i.e., mission, vision, value) that organizations should have created.
PART 1
In one long paragraph, explain to your possible audience (readership) the meaning of a mission statement, a vision statement, and a value statement. You will need at least one scholarly article for the mission, a separate article for the vision, and a separate article for the value statement.
PART 2
Then explain why you feel these three statements are important in an organization. You can use the three articles from Part 1 or find other scholarly articles to support your content, which will be needed if you choose the strategic research project pathway.
No attachments for any discussions . . . Please submit in the text box area. 
No generative artificial intelligence can be used as sources for discussions to include no use of Grammarly or any other platform that modifies and content and sources. 
No Secondary Sources, No Direct Quotes, No Bullets, No Abbreviations, No Acronyms, and No Contractions allowed . . . your full interpretation of the content and in an academic sentence/paragraph format (i.e., at least 5 to 6 sentences per paragraph). Your response should be a minimum of 350 words and should address each of the questions presented. In addition, your “two” peer responses must be at least 100 words. Review the attached rubric.