Assignment instructions Assignment 7.1: Evidence Summary Table/Matrix (Individ

Assignment instructions
Assignment 7.1: Evidence Summary Table/Matrix (Individual)
1. Summarize the EBP 2 articles (( #3 Research Article and #4 Non-Research Article) analyzed from your critical appraisal of the literature
2. Utilize the template provided in Canvas to complete your submission based on your 2 article review of the literature
o Use the provided template in the resources section to review evidence (JH Appendix G)
o Include the level of evidence and quality rating as designated in the template for each research study article
Please find the attached editable file docx table to complete this assignment, also find 2 attached files for the article to use #3 is Research article and #4 is non- research Article. I believed that you’re familiar with those 2 articles files , because you have previously used them to complete my order and that’s what my instructor want me to use to complete this project

Please see the Robic score Criteria 100 points possible
(1) Professional Writing Components APA citations / formatting, professional grammar/syntax, use of BSN Title page. 5points
(2) This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Article Summary Information Article author, title, publication date. 5points
(3) Evidence Type Indicate the type of evidence for each source. This should be descriiptive of the study or project design (e.g., randomized control trial, meta-analysis, mixed methods, qualitative, systematic review, case study, literature review) and not simply the level on the evidence hierarchy. 5 points
(4) Intervention Record the intervention(s) implemented or discussed in the article. This should relate to the intervention or comparison elements of your PICO question. 15 points.
(5) Pertinent Study Findings for PICO List succinct findings from the article that directly answer the EBP question. Avoid directly copying and pasting from the article. 20 points
(6) Study Measures These are the measures and/or instruments (e.g., counts, rates, satisfaction surveys, validated tools, subscales) the authors used to determine the answer to the research question or the effectiveness of their intervention. 15 points
(7) Both as listed by the authors as well as your assessment of any flaws or drawbacks. Consider the methodology, quality of reporting, and generalizability to the population of interest. Limitations should be apparent from the team’s appraisals using the Research and Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tools (Appendices E and F). 15 points
(8) Evidence Level & Quality Using the Research and Non-Research Evidence Appraisal tools (Appendices E and F), record the level (I-V) and quality (A, B or C) of the evidence. 10 points
(9) Group Contribution Notes Consider items that will be helpful to have easy reference to when conducting the evidence synthesis and pertinent considerations for answering group’s EBP PICO question. 10 points