Adding approximately 400-500words to the document attached This is the outline:

Adding approximately 400-500words to the document attached
This is the outline:
Legalizing Euthanasia as a Compassionate way of end-of-life care
General purpose: To convince
Specific purpose: The essay seeks to convince all stakeholders the importance of euthanasia as an effective approach to end–of-life care
Thesis statement: By allowing euthanasia and setting clear rules, we can establish a system that treats death with more compassion and humanity, alleviate suffering, while also respecting the dignity of individuals and the responsibilities of society.
1. Introduction:
1. Definition of Euthanasia and a hook statement
a) While death is natural, some people encounter miserable deaths, raising a crucial issue: does extending their agony promote life or is it an obsolete concept that violates their self-worth?
b) Euthanasia is the most appealing option, but its complexities need a comprehensive debate.
c) Euthanasia helps relieve suffering, uphold autonomy and self-determination, helps individual gain control over their final days and reduce burden on caregivers (Gupta & Bansal, 2023).
d) On the contrary, some people oppose Euthanasia on a religious and ethical perspective, risk of abuse and lack of effective system for safeguarding, and Concentration on palliative care and alternative approaches to improve quality of life.
2. Supporting statistics
a) Over seven countries have legalized Euthanasia. Tremendous impact on compassionate way to end life has significantly achieved.
b) Annually, an estimated 56.8 Million people, including 25.7 million in the last year of life are in need of palliative care (WHO, 2020).
c) Unfortunately, only 14% of the people access quality palliative, leaving the rest prone to suffering and agony (WHO, 2020).
d) Unnecessary restrictions on morphine and other key regulated palliative drugs limit patients access to proper palliative treatment thus accelerating the suffering.
e) The financial burden of patients is passed to the care givers, with 31.3% of caregivers reported anguish, 24.7% faced greater social strain, and 26.7% had disrupted routines (Loo et al., 2022).
3. Body
i. Euthanasia promotes autonomy and self determination
Individuals with terminal illnesses who can make decisions have the freedom to decide how and when they die, free of undue anguish. Euthanasia allows people to die on their own desired ways (Trejo-Gabriel-Galán, 2021).
ii. Alleviates suffering and upholds self-worth
Euthanasia helps end suffering to both the patients and the caregivers
iii. Control of the final days
Euthanasia helps people with authority over their last moments, helping them to say farewell to loved ones, organize their life, and die respectfully (Young et al., 2018)
iv. Reduce financial burden
Palliative care can be costly either emotionally or financially. Euthanasia can relieve this load, enabling them to concentrate on sorrow and healing.
4. Rebuttal
a) Religious and moral considerations
Religious beliefs on life is sacred and divinely given by God, and ending life contravene his will. Likewise, a sizable group believe that legalizing euthanasia can be ethically risky for the vulnerable in the society.
b) Vulnerable to abuse and fewer systems to safeguard its appropriateness
Concerns about misdiagnosis, coercion, mental health, and guidelines highlight complexities in euthanasia discussions.
c) Improve palliative care, enhance quality of life.
Debate centers on improving palliative care, focusing on life quality, and respecting the natural order.
5. Addressing concerns and misconceptions
Analyzing the impact of legalizing euthanasia, effectiveness on states where it has been legalized, and accessing challenges on risks and safeguards (Pereira, 2011).
6. Conclusion
a) Summarizing the main concepts
b) Restatement of thesis statement
c) Call for action
References
Gupta, A. K., & Bansal, D. (2023). Euthanasia – Review and update through the lens of a psychiatrist. Industrial psychiatry journal, 32(1), 15–18.https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_259_21
Loo, Y. X., Yan, S., & Low, L. L. (2022). Caregiver burden and its prevalence, measurement scales, predictive factors and impact: a review with an Asian perspective. Singapore medical journal, 63(10), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2021033
Pereira J. (2011). Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 18(2), e38–e45.https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.883
World Health Organization. (2020, August 5). Palliative Care. World Health Organization;World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/p…care
Trejo-Gabriel-Galán J. M. (2021). Euthanasia and assisted suicide in neurological diseases: asystematic review. Eutanasia y suicidioasistido en enfermedadesneurológicas: unarevisiónsistemática. Neurologia, S0213-4853(21)00090-6. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.04.016
Young, J., Egan, R., Walker, S., Graham-DeMello, A., & Jackson, C. (2019). The euthanasia debate: synthesising the evidence on New Zealander’s attitudes. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 14(1), 1-21.