Please review the screening/assessment tools discussed in module 2 of the course

Please review the screening/assessment tools discussed in module 2 of the course. You will select one of the tools to administer during your recorded interview assignment that is due in module 6. Once you select a tool, please provide an original summary analysis that describes why you selected this tool based on the population (peer’s mock case) you are interviewing. Your summary analysis should be between 250-500 words not including any references you use and will be submitted to the course for a grade.
Topic:
Unsatisfactory
Marginal
Proficient
Exceptional
Summary Analysis
(20 points)
[EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.1 & 4.4]
NoScreening/Assessment Tool Selection Analysis (0 points)
None or one of the following is evident: 1) Summary analysis is the appropriate length; 2) analysis demonstrates understanding of the tool and application for the population of interest; 3) analysis demonstrates examination of culture relevance related to the tool and application with the population identified; 4) analysis demonstrates critical thinking, as evidenced by thoughtful reflections, perceptiveness, and insight pertaining to the application of the tool.
(1-8 point)
Two or three of the following are evident: 1) Summary analysis is the appropriate length; 2) analysis demonstrates understanding of the tool and application for the population of interest; 3) analysis demonstrates examination of culture relevance related to the tool and application with the population identified; 4) analysis demonstrates critical thinking, as evidenced by thoughtful reflections, perceptiveness, and insight pertaining to the application of the tool.
(9-14 points)
All the following are evident: 1) Summary analysis is the appropriate length; 2) analysis demonstrates understanding of the tool and application for the population of interest; 3) analysis demonstrates examination of culture relevance related to the tool and application with the population identified; 4) analysis demonstrates critical thinking, as evidenced by thoughtful reflections, perceptiveness, and insight pertaining to the application of the tool.
(15-20 points)