Your case study should be a 4- to 6-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point T

Your case study should be a 4- to 6-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to the most recent APA guidelines Summarizes the case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period of the incident that occurred Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of the key legal components of the case , demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of which policies address the issues within the case. demonstrates astute ability in applying what the law states about standard of care to determine whether or not it was breached in the case. makes cogent connections between the incident and its impact on healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. makes a cogent connection to the level of accountability held against the healthcare provider based on the severity of the case . research and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the ethical issues led to the malpractice case . research and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the ethical theory would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. demonstrates a nuanced understanding of appropriate physician–patient shared decision-making models that would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes a cogent connection between the proposed ethical guidelines and how they would prevent the current and future incidents (100%) Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents (85%) Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursory (55%) Does not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the current and future incidents (0%) 7.96 Ethical Component: Defend Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections among the proposed ethical guidelines and how to hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (100%) Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (85%) Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but defense lacks detail or is illogical (55%) Does not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (0%) 6.37 Recommendations: Preventative Strategies Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations masterfully demonstrate how the healthcare provider can avoid liability in the future (100%) Recommends preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future (85%) Recommends preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future, but recommendations are cursory or illogical (55%) Does not recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future (0%) 6.37 Recommendations: Defend Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections among the recommended preventative strategies and how they would assist in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (100%) Defends how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (85%) Defends how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but defense is cursory or illogical (55%) Does not defend how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (0%) 6.37 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to- read format (100%) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)