Write a 500-750-word paper in which you apply ethical standards to resolve moral

Write a 500-750-word paper in which you apply ethical standards to resolve moral and ethical dilemmas in the provision of health care.
Choose an ethical dilemma that relates to nursing.
Include the following aspects in your paper.
An analysis of the ethical dilemma and the justification of your stance.
A desсrіption of what ethical decision model, skills, standards, and morals could be used to resolve the dilemma.
A desсrіption of a possible solution and how your leadership style influenced the decision-making process.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric Criteria
Ethical Dilemma and Justification
45 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Ethical Dilemma and Justification
5. Target
45 points
An analysis of the ethical dilemma and justification of the stance are complete, extremely thorough, and include substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable
40.05 points
An analysis of the ethical dilemma and justification of the stance are complete and include supporting details.
3. Approaching
35.55 points
An analysis of the ethical dilemma and justification of the stance are included but lack details.
2. Insufficient
33.75 points
An analysis of the ethical dilemma and justification of the stance are incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An analysis of the ethical dilemma and justification of the stance are not included.
Ethical Decisions, Skills, Standards, and Morals (B)
45 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Ethical Decisions, Skills, Standards, and Morals (C5.2)
5. Target
45 points
A desсrіption of what ethical decisions, skills, standards, and morals could be used to resolve the dilemma is complete, extremely thorough, and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable
40.05 points
A desсrіption of what ethical decisions, skills, standards, and morals could be used to resolve the dilemma is complete and includes supporting details.
3. Approaching
35.55 points
A desсrіption of what ethical decisions, skills, standards, and morals could be used to resolve the dilemma is included but lacks details.
2. Insufficient
33.75 points
A desсrіption of what ethical decisions, skills, standards, and morals could be used to resolve the dilemma is incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A desсrіption of what ethical decisions, skills, standards, and morals could be used to resolve the dilemma is not included.
Solution and Leadership Influence
30 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Solution and Leadership Influence
5. Target
30 points
A desсrіption of a possible solution and how leadership style influenced the solution is complete, extremely thorough, and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable
26.7 points
A desсrіption of a possible solution and how leadership style influenced the solution is complete and includes supporting details.
3. Approaching
23.7 points
A desсrіption of a possible solution and how leadership style influenced the solution is included but lacks details.
2. Insufficient
22.5 points
A desсrіption of a possible solution and how leadership style influenced the solution is incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A desсrіption of a possible solution and how leadership style influenced the solution is not included.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
7.5 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target
7.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable
6.68 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Approaching
5.93 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Insufficient
5.63 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
7.5 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Target
7.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable
6.68 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Approaching
5.93 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient
5.63 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
Mechanics of Writing
7.5 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
7.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
6.68 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
5.93 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
5.63 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
7.5 points
Criteria Desсrіption
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Target
7.5 points
No errors in formatting are present.
4. Acceptable
6.68 points
Appropriate format is used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
5.93 points
Appropriate format is used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
5.63 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used.
Total
150 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.