In approximately 1,500-2,000 words and essay form respond to the case-study scen

In approximately 1,500-2,000 words and essay form respond to the case-study scenarios and provide a theoretical analysis based on the theories and course concepts associated with the given scenario.
Each analysis should be thorough, being sure to fully consider the proposed scenario. Students should reference all theories and ideologies relatable to the scenario, ESPECIALLY those posed in the questions.
The scenarios are as follows:
In Roe v. Wade (1973), the Supreme Court ruled that abortion was a right protected under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), the same court, composed of different justices, determined that abortion was not a right protected under the Constitution. It was not “deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Since then, debates have ensued as to whether abortion is a fundamental right and what the status of abortion rights in the United States implies for the conditions of living for women and how this disproportionately impacts disenfranchised populations.
What are the rights of citizenship to be negotiated in this conversation on abortion rights?
What is the role of the state in protecting these rights?
What are the conditions of inequality that must be considered here?
How do processes of gender role and expectations, as well as racialization come into play?
Based on ethnographic evidence and research from Andaya (2019) and Davis (2019), what are arguments about reproductive ethics, race, class, gender, and sexuality that must be considered?
How are these things negotiated and understood politically?