.What are the benefits and weaknesses of anthropological access to the subject?4.I learned “what” that I didn’t know and how I changed my view of the world.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a anthropology report and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.The name of the book: Coming Up Short ./The author: Jennifer M. Silvafont size:10Essential elements:1.one summary of the book(Don’t copy the text from the book and write it in your own language)2.Which illuminates in earnest in this book culture is what will define and how do I define it.3.What are the benefits and weaknesses of anthropological access to the subject?4.I learned “what” that I didn’t know and how I changed my view of the world.
Requirements: A4,about 3pages   |   .doc file

I need a paper that answers the prompt “Discuss female gender identity in Postcl

I need a paper that answers the prompt “Discuss female gender identity in Postclassic Period Mexico. What kinds of social roles were gendered female and what forms of social power were available to women. ” there are a list of sources listed to be used, and I can provide access to these. It has a minimum of 8 pages of double-spaced text.

Students will write an approximately 8-10 page (2000-2500 words), double-spaced

Students will write an approximately 8-10 page (2000-2500 words), double-spaced paper on a question relevant to this class. The paper must significantly engage with course texts, and can be based in part on two or more interviews conducted by the student.
Draw on at least several non-assigned, peer-reviewed sources from anthropology or sociology (or another social science like psychology or economics) in addition to the class assignments.
This is a research paper that can also incorporate ethnographic elements. Please see the writing assignment rubric for more info on assessment. And note that you are responsible for developing your own research topic and question on something you’d like to know more about. See me always for extra help.

Module I focuses on primates and human evolution. Write a 2 page essay discussin

Module I focuses on primates and human evolution. Write a 2 page essay discussing the significant evolutionary features (physical/biological and cultural) associated with each of the 5 following early hominids:  Aridipithecus ramidus, the Australopithecines, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo Neanderthal.
Grading criteria for all 4 essay assignments:
100 points: Responds to essay assignment instructions and all parts of assignment addressed. Demonstrates understanding of anthropological concepts. Use/research of relevant anthropological sources. Proper grammar, spelling, flow of ideas, use of tenses, paragraph construction, etc. Reference citations and works cited are included and meet documentation requirements when web or print sources researched. Meets minimum  page requirement.

We frequently do not notice just how much information there is in a simple lingu

We frequently do not notice just how much information there is in a simple linguistic exchange, and this exercise will allow you to focus on a very small piece of data, and to record as much information about it as you can. Once again, we are making conscious a process which takes place largely unconsciously every time we enter into a conversation with another person, or every time we observe a conversation among other people.
Engage in three observation sessions. Having written them up, you can now work to apply the concepts from the course to your data. Did you see any of the phenomena we have discussed in
class (e.g., greetings, a level of formality or informality, the use of particular conversational genres, discursive consciousness, radical reflexivity, narratives of belonging, etc)? How do you know that is what you were seeing? Also, consider the data-gathering experience itself. Did it go the way you expected? What assumptions did you find yourself making about the speakers’ gender, ethnicity, age, relationship, etc? Was there anything about it that was easier or harder than you anticipated? Did you notice anything that you were surprised by? Were any expectations fulfilled by the behavior of the people you observed?

1. Anthropology as Science/Anthropology of Science :The Egg and the Sperm, by Em

1. Anthropology as Science/Anthropology of Science :The Egg and the Sperm, by Emily Martin 2. Gender and Gendering :Knights We Know, by Ellen Snortland Give a summary of how the authors discuss these topics and then explain how these topics inform and influence each other. Make sure to cite at least 2 authors. make your argument, think about: What are the major questions and conclusions of each reading, and how would they change when put in conversation with one another? What is the authors’ idea of culture, and how does it serve their arguments? Why is it important to look at these themes in dialogue? What are some of the issues that you see lacking in the readings, that could be brought up when taking both issues together? -the objective of the essay is to put both topics in conversation, not to just do a comparison of the readings. -Have a creative title! -Make sure to cite ALL quotes or paraphrases with a reference list at the end of your paper. General format: (Author Year: Page Number) -3 pages in 12 point, Times New Roman, single-spaced – No spaces between paragraphs,

write a two-pages critical response paper based on decolonizing global health be

write a two-pages critical response paper based on decolonizing global health beyond reformative roadmap and use the other one as resources to compare as well as reference reading for citation. However, mostly focus on the critical thinking part. Will be able to use maximum 2 outside sources for citation. The CRP represents an analysis, alongside some commentary, on another author’s writing. Your CR must contain a critical review of the reading selected; for this, you need to consider the following:
The first step is to summarize that which you are analyzing. Working through the reading, identify the main points and arguments contained in the work. Perhaps try to summarize these main points as you move through the text. Consider what evidence or support is given for each point. Reflect on how the work is structured and how this works towards achieving the text’s purpose.
Once you have gone over the text, reflect on whether its purpose was achieved and whether this purpose was meaningful. Evaluate the validity and effectiveness of supporting evidence. Also, consider the balance of the writing, in terms of whether more or less information was needed within each section.
Once you have reflected on the writing content, take some time to consider the style and structure of the text. Was the information organized in a way that helped or hindered your understanding? Did the structure suit the nature of the text? Finally, consider whether the language and style of the writing were in any way noteworthy, or specific to the text’s purpose.
Structuring your CR.
The introduction is used to establish your main argument regarding the work analyzed.
The summary of the reading is presented so that the reader will know what the text is about.
Find a way to connect this content-focused section with your analysis by starting with a commentary on the content. Here are some questions that might help you frame your response: What is the author’s main point? What evidence does the author use to support their claim, and do you think the evidence is compelling? Why or why not? Do you agree with the author’s argument? Why or why not? Does the argument challenge your views in any way? How do the concepts here build off of others, and can those concepts be extrapolated to other topics or ideas? Follow with a comment on the style and structure of the text that you are analyzing.
Remember that you should always apply critical thinking; this means that you should be able to back up any statement you made.
Your conclusion should bring all of the points you have made together in a manner that supports your writing’s main argument, as set out in the introduction.
FORMAT
Times New Roman 12
1.5 spaced
APA style for citations and references
Evaluation.
Introduction. 10
Body. 70
Conclusion. 10
References. 5
Orthography and typography. 5
(do not spend too much word on summarizing the text, the critical thinking part is the most important, it is pretty short so be elaborate)

Learning Goal: I’m working on a anthropology question and need guidance to help

Learning Goal: I’m working on a anthropology question and need guidance to help me learn.The essay title is Discuss how contemporary capitalism is rooted in colonialism.I
would like this essay to begin with different thoughts about the
emergence of capitalism ie, Marx and Engles. How other continents were
on a equal footing with Europe under the feudal system. What it was
that evoked Europe into becoming the capitalist driving force and how
this force is still at play today.I have read both Less is More and The Divide by Jason Hickel and would like some reference to his work. Must include Jason HickelIn
my past essays I have achieved a low first and would like this essay to
reflect an approximation to this. I have also made many reference in
past essays so would like more and not less of these.

A summary of the book called “ Nobody’s People ” by Anastasia Piliavsky’s . One

A summary of the book called “ Nobody’s People ” by Anastasia Piliavsky’s . One paragraph has to be about the Gender roles and norms: what genders are salient in a particular society; how they are socialized differently; how they perform different roles and act in different ways.

The remaining glaciers in Glacier National Park are receding at an alarming rate

The remaining glaciers in Glacier National Park are receding at an alarming rate and will likely not exist in 50 years. What factors are causing the rapid melting of these glaciers and why are the glaciers in this park particularly vulnerable to rising temperatures?