Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to read, use, and cite the case that has been attached. I also attached a link to the same case as well.
IHP 420 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a hospital was found vicariously liable on a theory of apparent authority for professional malpractice in the form of negligence of an independent contractor. You will focus on facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation, and you will explain how they were applied to law. You will then use the facts of the case to identify an ethics issue and determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Next, you will apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model to describe how the ethics issue could be resolved. You will also include a discussion about possible violations of the code of ethics in your given field. Lastly, you will augment or vary the facts of the case to create a hypothetical scenario that changes the outcome so that the hospital is no longer vicariously liable for professional malpractice in the form of negligence of an independent contractor.
For this milestone, you will start working on the case for the Final Project: Malpractice. Below you will find the name of the case you will investigate:
Popovich v. Allina Health System. https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-cou…
Prompt
In this milestone, you will complete part of your analysis of the malpractice case. Using this analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Introduction:Summarize the selected case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period in which the incident occurred.
Medical Malpractice Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to address the legal components, the malpractice policies similar to this case, and the standard of care given to the patient and how it was breached. Then, you will draw connections to how this malpractice case impacted stakeholders and healthcare consumers outside of the case.Explain the key legal components of the case, including the nature of the issue and the rules that applied.
Determine relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case.
Analyze the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim. Be sure to apply what the law states about standard of care to support whether or not it was breached in the case.
Analyze how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. For example, would this case have a similar impact on a person from a culture different from the one in the case? How could this incident change the views of these healthcare consumers toward the healthcare system?
Assess the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity. To what extent was the healthcare provider held accountable?
What to Submit
Your paper should be a 2 to 3 full page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Milestone One Rubric
CriteriaProficient (100%)Needs Improvement (70%)Not Evident (0%)Value
Introduction: SummarizeSummarizes the case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period of the incident that occurredSummarizes the case, but summary is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, or does not include information on the stakeholders, the problem, or the time period of the incidentDoes not summarize the case15
Medical Malpractice Component: Legal ComponentsExplains the key legal components of the case, including the nature of the issue and the rules that appliedExplains the key legal components of the case, but analysis is illogical, contains inaccuracies, or does not include the nature of the issue or the rules that appliedDoes not explain the key legal components of the case15
Medical Malpractice Component: Malpractice PoliciesDetermines relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the caseDetermines malpractice policies, but response lacks detail, or the chosen policies are irrelevant or do not address the issues of the caseDoes not determine relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case15
Medical Malpractice Component: Standard of CareAnalyzes the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim, and applies what the law states about standard of care to support whether or not it was breached in the caseAnalyzes the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim, but does not apply what the law states about standard of careDoes not analyze the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim15
Medical Malpractice Component: Cultural BackgroundsAnalyzes how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgroundsAnalyzes how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds, but analysis is cursory or contains inaccuraciesDoes not analyze how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds15
Medical Malpractice Component: AccountabilityAssesses the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity and explains the level of accountability the healthcare provider was held toAssesses the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity and explains the level of accountability the healthcare provider was held to, but explanation lacks detail or is illogicalDoes not assess the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity15
Articulation of ResponseSubmission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organizationSubmission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas10
Total:100%
Requirements: 2-3 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation for each body paragraph.
Please be sure to read, use, and cite the case provided in the link above. I also attached the same case as a pdf as well: https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-cou…