I already have the sources and research to use. Is a rhetorical analysis paper o

I already have the sources and research to use. Is a rhetorical analysis paper on the gym that aims to answer the question of the most effective training method. Has to be 2000 words or more and has the following sections: Introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Work cited should be at the bottom. Take that from my annotated bibliography. Since all the research is done, and the annotated bibliography is done. This will not take too long. Thanks. This assignment is already late, so I NEED it done by tomorrow evening (10/11) at the very latest as I lose points everyday. The instructions are below: Total word count for this project: At least 3,000 (1,000 for your annotated bibliography and 2,000 for your essay). As a result of completing this project, you should be able to: define “discourse communities”. describe discourse communities of your declared, or perspective academic major. identify a contemporary topic or issue within your field of study. develop a research question. discuss the difference between primary and secondary research. organize your sources into an annotated bibliography. organize the evidence of your essay around a thesis developed to assert the answer of your research question. Getting Started on Project 1 Discourse Communities: We have discussed what a discourse community is. I want you to think of them as groups that you participate in that each have their own expectations about communication. For this class, we are going to focus on your ACADEMIC discourse community (your field of study). If you aren’t sure what direction you plan to go yet, that is ok! What area most interests you or would you most likely choose to enter? For the purposes of this class, just choose one, but make sure you are willing to stick with it for the rest of the semester. Topics: Within each field, there are certain topics that people in academia are talking about or that maybe YOU would like to learn more and talk about. Maybe it is what drove you to this field in the first place. For example, we teach a lot of pre-med students. One of my friends’ students wanted to be a dermatologist to study skin care specifically to combat sun damage for people of color. There was another student interested in how maternal cardiological health impacts the mortality rates of women in certain places. A student spoke with from music wanted to question how music is taught in the western world… all very fascinating topics! The cool thing is, YOU get to choose your topic! In P1, we will learn more about this topic, to explore it, to answer a research question related to it. To help with topic selection, you might want to start off with a basic search of FSU’s library online. There are several tutorials for how to conduct a search. I encourage you to MOSTLY use the FSU library system for this course. I also use Google scholar (personally), but I encourage you not to stray too far from what can be found in the FSU library. You can schedule a meeting with a librarian (in person or on Zoom) to work with you one on one for this assignment and any others we have. They are a great resource and can save you a ton of time trying to figure things out on your own. Remember, you have FREE help in the reading and writing center too – links to those contacts are in the syllabus. Evaluation Criteria for Project 1 from the syllabus: The following is the grading criteria: A The essay meets or exceeds the assignment criteria. It asks and investigates the right kind of questions. The essay uses reliable sources intelligently, including unpacking quotes, paraphrasing, and summarizing in fair and insightful ways. The voice of the author is present—evaluating, critiquing, affirming or contextualizing the sources to make meaning. The essay stays on task, operates logically, and moves the reader toward understanding. The essay builds ethos by making good use of the appropriate documentation style; sources are cited correctly and a well-constructed list of sources is present. The assignment is relatively free of usage and mechanical errors. All drafts are submitted and reasonably complete. There is evidence of revision. B The essay mostly meets the assignment criteria. It may lack a particular type of source or one of the minimum number expected; however, it asks and investigates the right kind of questions. The essay might have one or two sources that are unreliable or off-topic, though it mostly uses sources intelligently. The author might over quote or allow sources to dominate the discussion of the topic. Nonetheless, the voice of the author is present to some degree—evaluating, critiquing, affirming or contextualizing the sources to, for the most part, make meaning. The essay may stray off topic or speak too generally. Still, the author makes sense and mostly operates logically. The essay builds ethos by making pretty good use of the appropriate documentation style; most sources are cited correctly and a well-constructed list of sources is present. There may be recurring errors of usage and mechanics. All drafts are submitted and reasonably complete. There is some evidence of revision. C The essay neglects the assignment criteria; it is rather brief or missing more than one source. It is persuasive instead of investigative. The essay struggles to present supporting sources and use them intelligently. One source might dominate the essay by being over-quoted, even as it helps the essay retain focus. Although the voice of the author may be present, there are a lot of generalizations and unsubstantiated claims. The essay strays off topic and generalizes instead of examining sources closely. Rhetorical moves are somewhat confusing and might occlude understanding. Little attention is paid to documentation style. Several sources are cited incorrectly, and the list of sources has omissions or improper citation entries. There are several errors of usage, mechanics, and punctuation that undermine the author’s ethos. All drafts are submitted and reasonably complete. Little revision is evident. D & Below The essay largely ignores the assignment criteria. It is exceptionally brief and misses the point of the assignment. The essay fails to present sources and use them intelligently; as a result, the essay is not informative about the topic or demonstrates learning. The essay strays considerably off topic and relies on generalizations instead of the information from sources. Rhetorical moves are confusing and tend to occlude understanding. Appropriate documentation style is almost entirely missing. Mechanical, usage, punctuation, and syntactic errors are pervasive. Drafts may be missing and little to no revision is evident.