Video Reaction 2 The Hunting Ground THIS ASSIGNMENT IS WORTH 70 POINTS Due Date:

Video Reaction 2
The Hunting Ground
THIS ASSIGNMENT IS WORTH 70 POINTS
Due Date: Sunday, November 5th at 11:59 pm

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to apply the three dimensions of sexuality (biological, psychological, sociocultural) that you have learned in class by describing how they are or are not covered within The Hunting Ground, a documentary about sexual assault on college campuses.

Assignment: For this video reaction, you must watch the film “The Hunting Ground.” This film is available digitally via the USF Library or Kanopy using USF credentials (https://usf.kanopy.com/video/hunting-groundLinks to an external site.). After you watch the film, address the points below.

Technical Requirements:
500-800 words in length (not including references)
Use of outside evidence to support your claims. You should have 3 sources: 1. the documentary; 2. the textbook; and 3. one source of your choice that supports your narrative and is reliable and valid.
Use of proper spelling and grammar
APA referencing style required (see Canvas for resources)
Paper formatting:
Typed
Font: Times New Roman; Arial; Calibri
Font Size: 12 pt
Margins: 1 inch each
Spacing: double spaced
Please note that only Word documents or PDFs can be viewed for grading. Please do not submit .Pages or GoogleDocs.

Content Requirements:
For this assignment, you must write a 4-paragraph essay that answers the following questions:
Paragraph 1:
Summarize The Hunting Ground using at least 3 details from the documentary.
Don’t forget to use citations for the video in your discussion.
Paragraph 2:
Define each of the three dimensions of human sexuality, using the textbook as your guide. Then, choose two dimensions that this video addresses and explain how each dimension is addressed using examples from the video.
Don’t forget to use citations for both the textbook and video in your discussion.
Paragraph 3:
What are two implications on or consequences of the content of this documentary on two of the following issues: sex, gender, society, or public health? (For example, how might society be impacted by sexual assault on college campuses?)
Don’t forget to use citations for both the video and the additional source in these discussions.
Paragraph 4:
Given your experience as a student at USF, in your opinion what needs to be improved on our campus regarding the prevention of sexual assault?
OR
What (if anything) surprised you in this video? If nothing surprised you, why not?
Note: The goal with both questions in paragraph 4 is to express your opinion and insights. You do not need references here and first person is appropriate.
Rubric
Video Reaction 2: The Hunting Ground
Video Reaction 2: The Hunting Ground
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo Summary
Summary, including at least 3 details from The Hunting Ground
14 pts
Full Marks
Summary includes at least three details from The Hunting Ground
9.5 pts
Partial Marks
Summary includes two details from The Hunting Ground
4.5 pts
Partial Marks
Summary includes at least one detail from The Hunting Ground
0 pts
No Marks
Summary does not include any specific details from The Hunting Ground
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDimensions
Define all 3 dimensions of sexuality
9 pts
Full Marks
Three dimensions of sexuality are accurately and fully defined
6 pts
Partial Marks
Two dimensions of sexuality are accurately and fully defined
3 pts
Partial Marks
One dimension of sexuality was accurately and fully defined
0 pts
No Marks
No dimensions of sexuality are accurately and fully defined
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDimensions Examples
Two dimensions from The Hunting Ground are identified and explained
9 pts
Full Marks
Two dimensions from The Hunting Ground is identified and explained using examples
4.5 pts
Partial Marks
One dimension from The Hunting Ground is identified and explained using examples
0 pts
No Marks
No dimensions are identified and explained using examples
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications
Two implications on and/or consequences of The Hunting Ground on sex, gender, society, or public health
14 pts
Full Marks
Two implications on or consequences of the content of The Hunting Ground on sex, gender, society, or public health are thoroughly explained
9.5 pts
Partial Marks
One implication on or consequences of the content of The Hunting Ground on sex, gender, society, or public health is thoroughly explained
4.5 pts
Partial Marks
Implications or consequences of the content of The Hunting Ground on sex, gender, society, or public health are not thoroughly explained
0 pts
No Marks
No implications on or consequences of the content of The Hunting Ground on sex, gender, society, or public health are thoroughly explained
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Narration
Thoughtful and thorough response to what needs to be done on campus OR what student is surprised by (or not) in The Hunting Ground
10 pts
Full Marks
Thoughtful and thorough response
5 pts
Partial Marks
Response not thoughtful or thorough
0 pts
No Marks
No response
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Referencing
APA references and in-text citation
6 pts
Full Marks
Reference page and in-text citations included
3 pts
Partial Marks
Reference page or in-text citations missing
0 pts
No Marks
Reference page and in-text citations missing
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar
4 pts
Full Marks
Less than 5 spelling and grammatical errors
2 pts
Partial Marks
More than 5 spelling and grammatical errors but doesn’t interfere with communication
0 pts
No Marks
More than 5 spelling and grammatical that interfere with communication
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnical Requirements
500-800 words; typed; font – Times New Roman, Arial, or Calibri; 12 point font; 1 inch margins; double-spaced
2 pts
Full Marks
All technical requirements met
1 pts
Partial Marks
One technical requirement not met
0 pts
No Marks
More than one technical requirement not met
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdditional Resource
One additional reliable and valid external source used to support narrative
2 pts
Full Marks
One reliable and valid external source used to support narrative
1 pts
Partial Marks
One external source not reliable or valid used to support narrative
0 pts
No Marks
No reliable and valid external source used to support the narrative
2 pts
Total Points: 70