In your post answer the following questions related to the Uber Discussion Case at the end of the chapter 1:
In the case Insuring Uber’s App-On Gap, which types of stakeholder power do Uber customers have (pg 13)? Explain your answer.
In the case Insuring Uber’s App-On Gap, which stakeholders supported ending the App-On Gap? Explain your answer.
Would you support more regulation for ride sharing companies if that resulted in less convenience, higher costs to the consumer and they operated more like traditional taxi companies? Justify your answer.
You will need to post a 350 word response to my question(s). Once you have completed
your initial post, the system will allow you to view the posts of your classmates.
your original post; at that point, the system will automatically assign you to a classmate to do a peer review on. Your peer review should be 150 words and include the following
1. Provide the name of the fellow student whose answer you are analyzing.
2. Provide a brief background on the question/scenario/problem that was posed.
3. Critically analyze and evaluate your classmate’s response.
Did you agree or disagree with their overall analysis and why? I am not looking for a
critique of their grammar or sentence structure, more of an analysis of their
position/answer/argument.
If applicable, your thoughts on any ideas they shared that you could apply to your career in
potentially new ways.
As it relates to the word counts for both your original post and peer review if you are a little over or
under the count, I will accept it. If you are quite a bit over or under the word count, I will deduct. I am
looking for a thoughtful discussion.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount