1. Provide an APA-formatted reference for your article. 2. Annotate the

1. Provide an APA-formatted reference for your article.
2. Annotate the RQ directly in the article and write it below. If your article does not explicitly state research questions (and you are absolutely sure it does not), you can do the following instead:
 State below that the article does not explicitly state RQs
Infer what the RQs is/are, based on something else the authors wrote
 Write your inferred RQs below and annotate the part of the article you used to infer the RQs directly in the article
3. Summarize below in your own words (3 or more sentences) two gaps in the literature that this article addresses based on its literature review. Annotate the parts of the article where you found this information directly in the article.
4. Write below whether the study uses primary or secondary data. Annotate the parts of the article where you found this information directly in the article.
5. Describe below in your own words (3 or more sentences) at least one worldview that seems to underlie this research. Annotate at least two parts of the article where you found this information directly in the article.
6. Describe below in your own words (3 or more sentences) two variables or themes that are studied in
the research. Annotate the parts of the article where you found this information directly in the article.
7. Describe below in your own words (5 or more sentences) one of the major findings of the study. (If the study has multiple RQs or has multiple findings, you only need to choose and describe one of them, but make sure it is a major finding). Annotate the parts of the article where you found this information directly in the article.
8. Describe below in your own words (5 or more sentences) how a different team of researchers could have used either a qualitative or quantitative approach (the opposite of your article type) to investigate the same research topic (include details about the RQ, design, methods, and data they would use). In other words, assume no connection between this study and the one you read about except they have the same research topic (i.e. it’s a parallel study. NOT a mixed methods design. Don’t worry about having a point of integration here).
9. Describe below in your own words (5 or more sentences) how the same team of researchers could have done either a qualitative or quantitative study after the one described in the article as part of an explanatory sequential multi-methods design (include details about the RQ, design, methods, and data). In other words, assume the two studies are part of the same study conducted by the same researchers and they require a point of integration.