You are not required to submit a separate bibliography for this exercise. BUT y

You are not required to submit a separate bibliography for this exercise. BUT
your last heading MUST be Further Reading and you should select 4 to 5
pieces of work or reports etc that you feel are appropriate for the recipient of
your ‘briefing note’ to read or view given your arguments and commentary.
These should have full citations and will stand for your bibliography.
Footnotes should be used sparingly. Direct quotations must be cited
SCENARIO Question: UK pharmaceutical companies argue that they struggle to recruit sufficient
participants in the UK. They are currently lobbying the government to make
participation a legally mandated moral duty for UK citizens. They say this is
necessary if they are to continue to develop drugs and treatments that help
with the health of the UK population.
You have been asked by the Secretary of State for Health to prepare a Briefing
Note on the potential risks and benefits of making participation in medical
research a legal and moral duty. You are asked to make recommendations
regarding the legal and ethical feasibility of the government taking forward this
the idea, or whether they should pursue an alternative strategy.
instruction : you are supposed to write this briefing note as if the secretary of state for health has requested you to do research and write a briefing note on the risk and benefits of making participation in medical research a legal moral duty. you are also required to make recommendations
regarding the legal and ethical feasibility of the government taking forward this
the idea, or whether they should pursue an alternative strategy. explain your reasons, formulate arguments use cases, articles, and journals. Use the sample as a guideline. make reference to your source with footnotes but further reading has to be further reading not used as bibliography
resource you might need
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8399763.stm
Lancet (2020). Human Challenge Studies and Covid-19