For this lesson’s assignment, create a PowerPoint presentation for your future d

For this lesson’s assignment, create a PowerPoint presentation for your future dissertation candidate self. The presentation is to be narrated and accompanied with visuals. Also, submit a written copy of the outline or narration of topics/concepts covered in your presentation. The written copy may be needed by your Instructor in case your presentation is not viable.
Inclusion in your presentation
Congratulate yourself! Remind yourself of your strengths! Make this assignment fun and insightful. However, avoid personal or unprofessional content that you would not want to share with your instructor!
Determine where you are in your literature search.
Identify how far you have come.
Identify what you have learned; consider a visual “walk-through” of things you might forget in the next 6 months.
Focus on your literature search strategy.
Demonstrate how to read your synthesis matrix.
Remind yourself of additional search terms or themes for possible exploration.
Gently provide for yourself an objective identification of areas to work on and outline a plan on where you might start.
Include possible resources (could be self-discovered resources, resources from the required and optional resource areas).
Consider practice activities from the Empower Yourself: Dissertation Activities sections.
Grading
This assignment is worth 10 points and is due on Sunday. For more specifics on how this will be graded, refer to the rubric below.
Due on Aug 13, 2023 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Assignment 8B Rubric v2
Criteria
Does Not Meet Expectations (0% – 69%)
Below Expectations (70%-79%)
Meets Expectations (80%-89%)
Exceeds Most Expectations (90%-93%)
Exceeds All Expectations (94%-100%)
Criterion Score
Current Status & Literature Search Strategy (20%) This criteria addresses ability to recognize and synthesize essential skills and techniques learned in this course for future literature search activities.
1.3998 points
Discussion reflects a poor or no application of literature search strategy knowledge.
1.5998 points
Discussion reflects minimal application of literature search strategy knowledge.
1.7998 points
Discussion reflects an adequate application of literature search strategy knowledge.
1.8798 points
Discussion reflects an advanced application of literature search strategy knowledge.
2 points
Discussion reflects a sophisticated application of literature search strategy knowledge.
Score of Current Status & Literature Search Strategy (20%) This criteria addresses ability to recognize and synthesize essential skills and techniques learned in this course for future literature search activities.,/ 2
Current Status & Literature Review Development (20%) This criteria addresses ability to synthesize essential skills and techniques learned in this course to develop future literature search activities.
1.3998 points
Discussion reflects a poor or not application of literature review development knowledge.
1.5998 points
Discussion reflects minimal application of literature review development knowledge.
1.7998 points
Discussion reflects an adequate application of literature review development knowledge.
1.8798 points
Discussion reflects an advanced application of literature review development knowledge.
2 points
Discussion reflects a sophisticated application of literature review development.
Score of Current Status & Literature Review Development (20%) This criteria addresses ability to synthesize essential skills and techniques learned in this course to develop future literature search activities.,/ 2
Current Status & Areas to Work On (20%) This criteria addresses ability to establish oneself as an independent learner.
1.3998 points
Discussion does not include self-reflection of current skill and areas for progressive achievement.
Discussion does not include primary resources and techniques learned.
Does not reflect critical thinking and problem solving.
1.5998 points
Discussion includes minimal self-reflection of current skill and areas for progressive achievement.
Discussion includes one or minimally identified primary resources and techniques learned.
Attempts to build higher level thinking skills that reflect critical thinking and problem solving.
1.7998 points
Discussion includes a realistic self-reflection of current skill and areas for progressive achievement.
Discussion includes at least two identified primary resources and two techniques learned.
Reflects high-level thinking skills that promote critical thinking and problem solving.
1.8798 points
Discussion includes an advanced and realistic self-reflection of current skills and areas for progressive achievement.
Discussion includes at least three or more identified primary resources and three or more techniques learned.
Reflects high-level thinking skills to promote acquisition of meaningful knowledge.
2 points
Discussion reflects an advanced and realistic self-reflection of current skills and areas for progressive achievement.
Presentation includes a visual walk-through of three or more identified primary resources and three or more techniques learned.
Includes high-level thinking skills to promote acquisition of meaningful knowledge and understandings.
Score of Current Status & Areas to Work On (20%) This criteria addresses ability to establish oneself as an independent learner.,/ 2
Plan (30%) This criteria addresses aability to identify direction to facilitate follow-through as an independent learner.
2.0997 points
Does not juxtaposition areas of current mastery and areas for progressive achievement to identify relevant learning needs.
Does not include learning objectives
Does not include strategies and techniques to address learning needs.
2.3997 points
Superficially uses areas of current mastery and areas for progressive achievement to identify relevant learning needs.
Attempts to include basic learning objectives relative to identified learning needs. Learning objectives are shallow.
Includes one strategy or technique to meet learning needs. Strategies or techniques are shallow.
2.6997 points
Uses realistic areas of mastery and areas for progressive achievement to identify relevant learning needs.
Includes viable learning objectives relative to learning needs.
Includes at least two strategies or techniques to meet learning objectives.
2.8197 points
Uses realistic areas of mastery and areas for progressive achievement to identify relevant learning needs.
Includes multiple learning objectives that build upon the student’s prior knowledge to meet learning needs.
Includes multiple learning strategies or techniques to meet learning objectives.
3 points
Juxtapositions areas of current mastery and areas for progressive achievement to identify relevant learning needs.
Includes appropriate, relevant, and sophisticated learning objectives to enhance students’ prior knowledge.
Includes resources and practice activities to meet learning objectives.
Score of Plan (30%) This criteria addresses aability to identify direction to facilitate follow-through as an independent learner.,/ 3
Academic Writing or Presentation (10%) This criteria applies to various assignment outcome types, for example written, oral, mixed, mind-maps, brochures, etc.
0.6999 points
Writing or presentation does not meet minimum expectations for appropriate academic voice or modeling to assignment medium.
Writing or presentation does not include satisfactory language, logical order, or explanation of key concepts of the assignment.
Writing or presentation does not addresses audience at an appropriate level.
Text is unreadable.
Audio/Visual components do not support the main points of the talk.
Inappropriate or no reference of evidence by presenter.
0.7999 points
Writing or presentation is below expectations for appropriate academic voice or modeling to assignment medium.
Writing or presentation includes satisfactory language with logical order and partial or unclear explanation of key concepts of the assignment.
Writing or presentation does not address the audience at an appropriate level.
Text is unclear or unreadable.
Audio/Visual components, as applicable, support the main points of the talk.
Minimal or inappropriate referencing of evidence by presenter.
0.8999 points
Writing or presentation is in appropriate academic voice or modeling of assignment medium.
Writing or presentation includes satisfactory language with logical order and explanation of key concepts of the assignment.
Writing or presentation addresses audience at an appropriate level.
Text is readable and clear.
Audio/Visual components, as applicable, support the main points of the presentation.
Appropriate referencing of evidence by presenter.
0.9399 points
Writing or presentation exceeds most expectations for academic voice or modeling of assignment medium.
Writing or presentation includes satisfactory language with logical order and clear explanation of key concepts of the assignment.
Writing or presentation addresses audience at an appropriate level.
Text is readable and clear.
Audio and Visual components, as applicable, support the main points of the presentation.
Appropriate referencing of evidence by presenter.
1 point
Writing or presentation exceeds all expectations for academic voice or modeling of assignment medium.
Writing or presentation includes satisfactory language with logical order and clear explanation of key concepts of the assignment.
Writing or presentation addresses audience at an appropriate level.
Text is readable and clear.
Audio/Visual components, as applicable, support the main points of the presentation.
Appropriate referencing of evidence by presenter.
Score of Academic Writing or Presentation (10%) This criteria applies to various assignment outcome types, for example written, oral, mixed, mind-maps, brochures, etc.,/ 1
Total
Score of Assignment 8B Rubric v2,/ 10
Overall Score
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 points minimum
Below Expectations
7 points minimum
Meets Expectations
8 points minimum
Exceeds Most Expectations
9 points minimum
Exceeds All Expectations
9.4 points minimum